Does The Daily Mail's Mick Philpott Front Page Prove Press Regulation Is Necessary?

Posted: Updated:

The Daily Mail's controversial front page on convicted murderer Mick Philpott has renewed the discussion on whether press regulation is justified.

In the wake of the reaction to the tabloid's splash, which was described as a "uniquely revolting piece of work", some have now said the incident has provided a case for press regulation.

Look out for the Ad just below here

Article continues after the advertisement

The paper's front page provoked a furious reaction online

Peter Murray
The horrifying actions of one evil individual cannot and, must not, be tooled to further demonise an entire section of society

Ben Ramsdale, president of Liverpool Hope University's student union, told the Huffington Post UK called the Mail's article "truly irresponsible journalism".

"We rely on our national and local media to inform us accurately and fairly and so there has to be some kind of standard to which we hold every news outlet," he said. "Stories like this one play into a hideous narrative about the poor and those on benefits which, unfortunately, resonates with a lot of people. It should be the job of an informed media to report the truth and not cynically play into this ignorant caricature."

Ben Ramsdale
This headline actually suggests that claiming benefits leads to arson, rape and murder and is utterly unconscionable...

Ben Ramsdale
...We should be calling on the Mail to retract the story and apologise (although they never will.)

"This story and how it was presented represents truly irresponsible journalism and an attack on some of the most vulnerable people in society."

Ramsdale, who is also an LGBT activist, continued: "While we must be careful to preserve a free and independent media, we have seen that the profit motive has driven some news outlets to immoral and illegal activities.

"It is clearly damaging to our country to allow this sort of shoddy and dangerous journalism to continue. If the press cannot regulate themselves to prevent this sort of "reporting" then there must be legal safeguards."

Quick Poll

Has The Daily Mail Gone Too Far With This Front Page?


Anna Claeys, a Cambridge University student journalist, disagrees, and maintains press regulation is still unjustified.

"The only way to deal with this is for the journalistic community and the wider public to highlight the shame in misrepresenting facts and prioritising a political agenda over the objective story, and to publicly condemn the Daily Mail for its crusade of character assassination against welfare claimants," she says.

Anna Claeys
Disgusting journalism to use a tragic individual case to attack the welfare state, and implicitly condemn claimants as 'vile'.

"Using a rare and tragic case as a political weapon is the lowest form of journalism, and the Mail’s editorial aims are clear: to demonise and shame benefit claimants, to paint the provision of benefits as wasteful, and to support government cuts to welfare spending."

they chose to step-over the deaths of six children to play the politics game, it's despicable.

Do you think the Daily Mail's Mick Philpott splash warrants the introduction of press regulation? Tweet @HPUKStudents with your views or comment below.

Philpott House Fire
Share this
Current Slide

Suggested For You

Suggest a correction

Around the Web

Mick Philpott sang Elvis songs at karaoke hours after ... - Daily Mail

Evil Mick Philpott shot me in the groin with a ... - Daily Mail

'Daily Mail' Mick Philpott 'Welfare UK' front page sparks outrage ...

Outrage over the Daily Mail's Mick Philpott headline – but the ...

Philpott sentencing: Derby fire deaths duo 'good' parents

Mick Philpott: The Blame Game - Is It the Welfare State's Fault?

Derby fire deaths: 'Possible' that Mick Philpott set fire

UK couple face jail for killing 6 children in fire