POLITICS

Migration Watch Lobbyists 'Have Met Advisers For The Home Secretary'

04/08/2013 14:58 BST | Updated 04/08/2013 15:02 BST
PA
Undated handout photo issued by the home office of one of the 'go home' vans as Downing Street has defended the controversial poster campaign aimed at encouraging illegal immigrants to leave the UK, despite the initiative being condemned by a Liberal Democrat Cabinet minister.

The Home Secretary's special advisers have held meetings with a controversial anti-immigration group, it has been reported.

The Observer said Theresa May's staff had held three meetings with Migration Watch, which lobbies for lower immigration levels, in the past two years.

Migration Watch has a campaign called 'No to 70 million' and has claimed 50,000 Romanians and Bulgarians will come to the UK when visa restrictions are lifted next year.

It comes amid a growing row over the rhetoric and tactics used by the government on immigration.

Vans were driven around London, carrying a 'go home' message aimed at illegal immigrants, while spot checks saw the Home Office accused of 'racial profiling'.

The vans, which have now been withdrawn after their pilot period ended, were even criticised by the Tories' tough-talking adviser Lynton Crosby, according to the Sunday Times (£).

The paper said the Australian had warned the tactic was playing into the hands of Ukip, because it focused the debate on the “tactics not the issue”.

Immigration minister Mark Harper defended the use of spot checks at London Underground stations, saying they were based on individuals' behaviour, not their nationality.

But one of the government's immigration advisers questioned the tactics.

Dr Martin Ruhs, a member of the Migration Advisory Committee, warned that Britain did not want to use tactics for dealing with migrants more familiar in countries like Singapore or much of the Middle East.

He questioned whether the headline-grabbing initiatives were effective as a policy, rather than simply being a "spectacle".

"In liberal democracies generally we don't want to do the kinds of things that are commonplace in Singapore or maybe the Middle East," Dr Ruhs told The Observer.

"You have to draw the line somewhere. Different people will draw the line in different places over what is acceptable in how you treat people.

"Obviously the Government has to do something about irregular immigration, but the issue is more complex than many policymakers believe.

"Some policies have an element of a spectacle - you want to send a signal, and those policies aren't necessarily the most effective."