The Sunday Express chief theatre critic has claimed he has been fired after naked pictures of him were discovered on a paid-for gay website.
Mark Shenton, the site's theatre maestro for the past 11 years, has said he has been accused of bringing the newspaper into "disrepute."
"My sexuality is public knowledge and by revealing this information freely as I’m doing now, it is clear that I do not agree," he has responded.
In a blogpost announcing that he had been fired, he wrote: "The paper had been tipped off by a malicious third party that there were some private, personal (but entirely legal) images of me available on a gay website."
He claimed that the paper's editor, Martin Townsend, told him the pictures were embarrassing.
"It is truly ironic that I should be fired by an organisation run by a pornographer," he said, referring to the paper's owner, Richard Desmond.
"It is rank hypocrisy to sack me over this," he told the Guardian.
So why is the Sunday Express, a publication owned by a company that operates adult television channels, allegedly concerned by supposedly salacious images? Because the material was gay, Shenton argues.
“It could be said that the only difference is that these are straight magazines and channels, whereas mine was defined as a gay one," he wrote.
Speaking to the Huffington Post UK he said the support he has had since his dismissal has been "extraordinary."
At one point yesterday #teamshenton was even trending on social media sites.
"Bigots and bullies never win in the end," he said.
Many reacted to his alleged treatment on Twitter:
The treatment of Mark Shenton is a disgrace - one of the most professional, descent and upstanding people I've ever worked with!
— Jason Phipps (@jasotweet) December 6, 2013
Stunned by Mark Shenton's sacking. Utterly ridiculous.
— Hannah (@HannahB175) December 5, 2013
@sundayexpress1 Shameful treatment of Mark Shenton
— Simon Bell (@simon__bell) December 5, 2013
Northern & Shell, Desmond's publishing company, declined to comment to HuffPost.
The company said "it is known" it disputes Shenton's version of events.