Scottish Independence Would Put Scotland In A 'Neo-Colonial' Position, Warns Gordon Brown

22/08/2014 16:08 | Updated 22 August 2014

Gordon Brown has urged Scots to "think twice" before voting 'Yes,' in a stark warning against independence as the referendum campaign enters its final stage today with just four weeks to go until the fate of the nation is revealed.

In a fierce attack against the First Minister of Scotland, Brown argued Alex Salmond's plans would leave Scotland in a "neo-colonial" position.

Making the case for a No vote in Glasgow, Brown argued that oil cash would only pay for a "fraction" of public services if the country left the UK, and insisted Scotland must remain a part of the Union to ensure the costs of health care and welfare continued to be shared.

gordon brown

Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown delivers a Scottish referendum keynote speech

In a keynote speech, the former Labour leader said while Scotland spent some £40 billion a year on health, education, pensions and social security, forecasts had shown that, in the first year of independence, oil revenues would amount to £2.9 billion.

With less than four weeks to go until voters north of the border decide if the country should become independent or stay in the UK, Brown told an audience in Glasgow that Scots benefit from higher levels of spending per person than in England.

With NHS funding based on need, he said £950 million more came to Scotland than if health spending was determined solely by the size of the country's population.

Health has become a key battleground in the independence campaign, with nationalists claiming the only way to protect the NHS from privatisation is to vote Yes on September 18.

But Brown said the health service is too vital to throw away for independence.

"You've got to think twice about the benefits of throwing all this away with Alex Salmond's proposals for separate national health services in Scotland, Wales, England and Northern Ireland," he said.

He argued that there is "no point" in getting rid of the unified funding of national healthcare in Scotland saying it "actually benefits" from being part of the UK system of funding.

"Every year we spend in Scotland £2,115 on average for every single Scot, every man, woman and child. That's about £40 a week on average is spent for the typical Scot on health care. In England the figure is £1,912," he said.

He argued "it is time" the Scottish National Party admitted "the reason is we fund our health service because of the needs of people."


Scotland Would Become 'Wealthiest Country In World To Declare independence'

Salmond's Oil Predictions May Have Been Tincy Bit Overestimated

Love Auntie Beeb? Vote No To Scottish Independence, Former BBC Chief Warns

Alex Salmond Is Not A Fan Of This 'Flawed' Currency Poll

The BBC Could Get A Northern Rival

"Why should we throw all this away, especially when we can spend the money in Scotland in any way we choose?"

With health decisions already devolved to the Scottish Parliament, Brown said the only person who can privatise the National Health Service in Scotland today is actually Alex Salmond - because "it is in Scotland alone the decisions about the future allocation of resources and the private/public balance in the health service is made."

He told the audience at the Emirates Arena that 87% of English people and 90% of Scots supported having a health service that is free at the point of need.

"There is no culture clash between Scots and English on that," he said.

"The Scottish people, the English people, the Welsh people, Northern Irish people, they love the idea of a National Health Service and we should fight together to preserve the National Health Service.

"Why should we throw all this away when we know perfectly well that the SNP have not proved to us they could even fund the national health service properly?"

He said the UK Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) had forecast that in 2016-17 - potentially the first year of an independent Scotland - oil revenues would be worth £2.9 billion.

While the Scottish Government believes these could be higher at £7 billion, Brown said these figures had been challenged earlier this week by oil expert Sir Ian Wood, who claimed that the nationalists had overestimated the amount that could be raised in oil revenues.

"Pensions cost £9 billion a year in Scotland, the health service costs £12 billion a year, education costs £6 billion a year, the rest of the welfare state from child benefit to disability benefits cost another £13 billion a year.

"£2.9 billion in oil revenues to pay for £40 billion of expenditure just on education, health, pensions and the rest of the welfare state.

"The oil revenues, to be honest, are a fraction of what we need to pay for our public services."

He also attacked Scottish Government plans to keep the pound if there is a Yes vote saying Salmond's plans for a currency union were simply "untenable."

The Labour MP, who was chancellor in Tony Blair's government, told the audience: "Decisions about your interest rates, your mortgages, the amount business has to pay to borrow, money supply, they would all be made by the rest of the United Kingdom through a UK Monetary Policy Committee that does not include Scots, through a Bank of England that doesn't have Scottish representation, through a Treasury that doesn't have Scottish representation, and through UK Parliament that will set the laws for the Bank of England and the currency with no Scottish representation whatsoever."

He accused the Scottish First Minister of "putting us in a position where we have to accept decisions we don't play any part in making, we would have to accept decisions on interest rates will be made by the rest of the United Kingdom to meet their needs and Scotland, he proposes, will simply accept these results".

Brown hit out: "That's a completely untenable position. He knows perfectly well it's an unsustainable position, but he's putting Scotland in a neo-colonial position."

It is Labour – not the SNP – he said, who have proposals which "would make our country a fairer place."

"The question we need to answer on September 18 is this," he said. "Should we abandon the idea of sharing across the UK the costs of health care, pensions and welfare when it is fairer than anything the SNP would give us?"

"The answer is no," he concluded.

  • No: Barack Obama
    The American electorate may have gone off their president after five and a half years in office but Barack Obama still enjoys 2008 levels of popularity in the UK. People from the No Campaign probably fainted when Obama said "the key word is 'united'" when asked about Scotland.
  • Yes: Sir Sean Connery
    Danny Lawson/PA Archive
    Austin Powers may be against independence but James Bond isn't. Sir Sean has told his fellow Scots that independence "is too good an opportunity to miss". He also said the potential boosts to the film and creative industries are "particularly exciting".
  • No: Hillary Clinton
    "I would hate to have you lose Scotland," the potential next American president told Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight. "I hope that it doesn't happen but I don't have a vote in Scotland. But I would hope it doesn't happen." She added: "I would think it would be a loss for both sides but, again, I don't have a vote."
  • Yes: Brian Cox (Not That One)
    The face of BBC science has not declared for or against Scottish independence but his namesake, actor Brian Cox is firmly in favour of it. He has provided the voice of Duggy Dog, an animated Highland Terrier created by the Yes campaign who aims to "sniff out fact from fiction" in the independence debate.
  • No: David Bowie
    Martin Rickett/PA Wire
    Since dabbling in right-wing politics in the 1970s, Bowie's views appear to have mulled somewhat. When Kate Moss collected his BRIT award earlier this year, she read a statement on behalf that asked Scotland to "stay with us". The statement said: "In Japanese myth the rabbits from my old costume that Kate's wearing live on the moon. Kate comes from Venus and I from Mars, so that's nice. I'm completely delighted to have a Brit for being the best male, but I am, aren't I Kate? I think it's a great way to end the day. Thank you very, very much and Scotland - stay with us."
  • Yes: Alan Cumming
    Andy Kropa /Invision/AP
    This Scot is firmly pro-independence. So much so, the New York-based actor bought a flat in Edinburgh last year so he would be able to vote in September's referendum. Unfortunately, it was deemed not to be his "main address" and, by extension, he will not be able to vote.
  • No: JK Rowling
    Ian West/PA Wire
    JK Rowling, who wrote her first Harry Potter book while living in Edinburgh and still lives in the Scottish capital, has given £1 million to defeat Alex Salmond. She wrote she was "no fan of the Westminster government". She added: "The simple truth is that Scotland is subject to the same 21st century pressures as the rest of the world. The more I listen to the Yes campaign, the more I worry about its minimisation and even denial of risks." A Twitter account digested this and reflected: "What a #bitch after we gave her shelter in our city when she was a single mum."
  • Yes: Billy Bragg
    Jonathan Short/Invision/AP
    Always outspoken, Bragg's take on Scottish independence is that it would be as good for his native England as it would for north of the border. The left-winger said: "Scottish independence throws up the possibility of a more progressive England. We won’t be British any more, we’ll be English."
  • No: The BBC, According To Protestors
    Jonathan Brady/PA Wire
    On Sunday, 2,000 people gathered outside BBC Scotland's Glasgow headquarters to protest what they saw as its pro-union stance. A couple who attended the protest said: "The BBC is paid for by all of us whether Yes or No but it doesn’t reflect both sides of the campaign. They don't cover stories that damage No, but are always headlining stories against Yes."
  • No...ish: Pope Francis
    Pope Francis voiced concerns about Scottish independence - but his comments were non-commital to the point where both the yes and no camps welcomed them. Speaking about secession movements across the world, the infallable representative of God on earth said countries breaking away from larger states should be considered on a "case-by-case basis". He acknowledged the case was "clear" in in some cases but listed Scotland as one of the cases where "I ask myself it is so clear". He said: "Let's think of the former Yugoslavia. Obviously, there are nations with cultures so different that couldn't even be stuck together with glue. "The Yugoslavian case is very clear, but I ask myself if it is so clear in other cases - Scotland, Padania, Catalunya." No campaigners said the Pope was "right to warn about the impact of division" while No campaigners said: "As His Holiness says, these matters should be looked at on a case-by-case basis."
  • Yes: Glasgow's Sunday Herald
    Sunday Herald
    The Sunday Herald became the first Scottish paper to back the yes campaign in May with this front cover. It wrote: "We understand the past, as best we can, and guess at the future. But history is as nothing to the lives of the children being born now, this morning, in the cities, towns and villages of this country. "On their behalf, we assert a claim to a better, more decent, more just future in which a country's governments will be ruled always by the decisions of its citizens.''
  • Yes. No. Wait, What?: Elijah Wood
    Sir Sean appeared to win an ally when Lord of The Rings actor Elijah Wood said Scotland should "fucking go for it" with independence. But he later backtracked, claiming he had misunderstood the question he was asked at the Edinburgh Film Festival. Speaking to the Scotsman, he said: "You know, in truth, I thought they were talking about independent cinema. I mean, it’s a film festival.”
Suggest a correction