POLITICS

Tax Cuts For The Rich? 4 Graphs David Cameron Does Not Want You To See

01/10/2014 13:09 BST | Updated 01/10/2014 19:59 BST

David Cameron revealed today that the Tories plan to fight the next general election on a tax-cutting platform, as he unveiled two major pledges at the party's annual conference in Birmingham.

Telling delegates that he would "build a Britain that everyone is proud to call home", the Prime Minister promised to raise the income tax allowance from £10,500 to £12,500, and increase the threshold at which the 40p tax threshold kicks in from £41,900 to £50.000.

Despite Cameron's insistence that these pledges were aimed at "hard-working" households and would benefit around 30m people across the UK, expert analysis suggests these tax giveaways would, in fact, help the rich much more than the poor - or, for that matter, the 'squeezed middle'. The Tories say their tax cuts would cost just over £7 billion a year by 2020, suggesting - in response to critcism that the cuts are "unfunded" - that they would be paid for with public spending cuts and greater economic growth coming through.

However, former Treasury official James Dowling, now director at FleishmanHillard, told HuffPostUK that far fewer people will "actually feel the fruits" of the Tories' tax cuts than suggested as they would come in after the deficit is cleared, which is set to be around 2018.

"The Tories have been briefing that this would only take place after the deficit is cleared (around 2018), and would cost around £5.5bn/annum," he explained. "These numbers indicate how few people will actually see the benefit of the rise – a fraction of the 4.3m higher rate tax payers."

The respected Institute for Fiscal Studies showed in their Green Budget publication this year that just 15% of the gains from increasing the personal allowance would benefit the poorest half of Britons, concluding: "There are better ways to help the low paid via the tax and benefit system."

Ex-Treasury official James Meadway, who is now a senior economist at the New Economics Foundation, said Cameron's changes were "irresponsible, expensive gimmicks that scarcely affect the poorest workers". "They imply swingeing public sector cuts and mean handing over more cash to the already rich," he added.

Meanwhile, Tom Papworth, associate director of economic policy at the liberal think-tank CentreForum told HuffPostUK: "Raising the threshold for the 40p rate cuts taxes for the richest people outside the top 10% of earners. It does nothing for middle earners. "

Here are the four charts that Cameron would really doesn't want you to see as he tries to woo voters on low and middle incomes with these two new tax cuts.

Cameron's tax pledges - the risks

READ MORE:

Ukip Defection Embarrassments Just Keeping Coming For Cameron...

This Tory MP Thinks A Lot Of You Are 'Immoral'

Top Strategist Has Stern Warning About Tory Popularity With Minority Voters

IDS Dodges Mansion Tax Question With An Eric Pickles Fat Jibe