UK

Daily Express Front Page Faces Furious Backlash For Attack On 'Hidden Migrants'

26/11/2014 15:20 GMT | Updated 26/11/2014 16:59 GMT

The Daily Express varied from its usual front page topics of weather chaos and miracle cures Wednesday, instead sparking a furious backlash for referring to children born in the UK as "hidden migrants."

The paper published findings from the pressure group Migration Watch - whose chairman Sir Andrew Green was recently handed a peerage from David Cameron - suggesting that official figures "hide the true picture" of immigration in the UK and blaming a "foreign family baby boom" for a gargantuan invasion of "new arrivals and their offspring."

READ MORE:

An Open Letter to Richard Desmond on 'Hidden Migrants'

Labour Attacks 'Highly Offensive' Daily Express Immigration Front Page

Government figures "fail to include births to immigrant ­parents," Migration Watch states, claiming that migrants and their children "accounted for 3.8 million out of a 4.6 million expansion in numbers in the UK between 2001 and 2012."

Apparently, unless annual migration is drastically cut, Britain will need "10 new cities the size of Birmingham" to accommodate this extra population.

The Express appeared to fail to understand that children born to immigrants living in the UK, are in fact British, rather than being "hidden", and instead appeared to suggest that the offspring of migrants will always remain "foreign."

The Office for National Statistics, which provides the nation's official population figures, says it does not count the count children born in the UK as migrants "in accordance with UN international standards."

Migration Watch has now distanced itself from the Express' headline, acknowledging that the term "hidden migrant" is "not appropriate".

Somewhat unsurprisingly, the tabloid's front page was greeted with horror and disbelief as many explained that under the Express' guidelines, they would themselves be classed as "hidden migrants" along with a whole host of notable names including the Royal Family, Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage's children, Nick Clegg and his children, Winston Churchill and Ukip immigration spokesperson Steven Woolfe.

Incredibly Farage, who is married to a German woman, even backed the Migration Watch report, with Ukip stating that it's not "the children that are the problem, it is hiding them."

The spokesman added that the Eurosceptic party leader would never talk about his children "either way."

While the Express was not alone in publishing the Migration Watch report, the borderline "open racism"of its headline caused the most contention.

Many took to Twitter to advise that the paper not to confuse the status of British-born citizens.

Now, in an open letter to Richard Desmond, the owner of Express Newspapers, published on The Huffington Post UK, Labour launched a strong attack on the paper for making a "highly offensive" claim.

Shadow cabinet minister Lord Stewart Wood, one of Ed Miliband's closest allies, said on Wednesday afternoon the paper was making a "clear implication" that the children of immigrants who are born and raised here are really immigrants too.

"I cannot see any quote from Migration Watch to justify the headline that these immigrants are 'hidden', so I assume it was the view of the Daily Express," he said.

He said: "Your paper has long argued that members of the British public have legitimate concerns about the impact of immigration – a position shared by the Labour Party and Ed Miliband. But suggesting by implication that people who are born and brought up here are somehow un-British or foreign because one or both of their parents emigrated here from abroad surely is not legitimate, but rather is inaccurate and, to many, highly offensive."

The Labour peer added: "I also find it curious that a paper owned by someone whose maternal grandparents came to this country from Ukraine in search of a better life would be happy to give this impression about the descendants of immigrants."