We're all in this together? Not since Marie Antoinette's infamous "let them eat cake" has a phrase so neatly captured the class divide.
For despite what the likes of David Cameron and his erstwhile chum, the former Sun editor Rebekah Brooks, might once have thought - we are blatantly not all in this together. The risible notion of a classless society remains what it always was: a suburban myth. Recession has only broadened the gap between the haves and the have-nots.
While ordinary folk tighten their belts and embrace DIY, the socio-economic elite talks merely of downsized kitchen suppers, free horses and emergency jerrycans. Language is as identifying as any Masonic handshake. If the past is a foreign country, Cameron and his ilk belong on the moon.
Brooks' sycophantic yet strangely manipulative text message to the Prime Minister - as revealed before the Leveson Inquiry this week - further highlighted the social schism that defines this country. If an army marches on its stomach, Tories clearly march on supper - be they in Francis Maude's kitchen, Cameron's country or George Osborne's Mansion House.
Politics have come, if not full circle, certainly 180 degrees. In lieu of Tony Blair's quasi-presidential grandeur and John Prescott's champagne socialism, we now have an Old Etonians' tofftopia: an ageing Bullingdon Club.
Cameron huffed and puffed at Leveson as he hotly denied being in cahoots with News International. There were, he said, no deals, no backstage "nods and winks". But were cosily clandestine suppers with puppeteer Brooks really any better? Worse, the C-word haunted his every line.
The Tory leader tried desperately to claim their assignations were perfectly normal, banal even: we're neighbours, we chat. But these weren't just any old neighbours popping next door for tea and a buttered slice. When you have to preface a dinner date with a geographical adjective according to how many houses you own, you are not easily going to win over the common man.
It is, of course, ironic that Cameron and Brooks should have been hoisted by the class petard, since they have both battled to blur their wildly different origins.
The former - with his thin "call me Dave" attempts - has always vainly sought to play down his gentrified origins, as has his wife. Samantha Cameron - the daughter of a baronet - famously claimed to have been brought up "outside Scunthorpe" which, though arguably true, fell somewhat short of the actuality: the 3,000-acre Thealby Hall estate.
Brooks's reinvention - from News of the World secretary to Sun editor - was by far the more convincing and impressive. Whatever one thinks of her motives, alleged methods or undeniably useful marriages, no one can doubt her ambition or drive.
But while the Prime Minister clings to power, his neighbour - charged with perverting the course of justice - is the one facing imprisonment. And that is the uncomfortable "moral" of the British class system. It is, sadly, far easier to stay atop the greasy pole than to climb up.
The country suppers are, one suspects, over for Rebekah Brooks: free to those that belong, very expensive to those that don't.
Follow Adam Lee-Potter on Twitter: www.twitter.com/adamleepotter
William Hanson: The British Empire Medal Strikes Back
Peter G Tatchell: An Open Letter to David Cameron on Civil Marriage and Civil Partnership Equality
Meredith Alexander: If Cameron Can't Stop the Hippos...
Patrick Garratt: Why Flag-Waving Is Anything But 'a Bit of Harmless Fun'
David Cameron - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
David Cameron | Politics | The Guardian
The Conservative Party | People | David Cameron
Britain Prime Minister David Cameron testifies in media inquiry
David Cameron is tainted prime minister - Ed Miliband
David Cameron survives the Leveson Inquiry but his harshest test is ...
Thank you David Cameron - giving comfort to dud parents everywhere
Cameron left his daughter at a pub? Britain shrugs, commiserates.
Me, I say pull the other one.
Gove should look out as he is not of the PPE-Oxford set, one mistake and he will be a goner. Warsi is doomed (no PPE-Oxford there), as Fox was doomed when he made his mistake. Hunt, of course, was saved (PPE-Oxford), and well Brooks, she will not be saved as she is not of the PPE-Oxford set.
But as a Canadian at school in England, I watched from the sidelines, as it were, as those with less rounded vowels and common surnames got ignored in seminars, consistently received lesser marks for stronger work, and were unaccountably left off certain guest lists that were ostensibly meant for entire departments.
It was shocking (for me at least), but I always suspected that if times got tough, the class divides would re-emerge as weapons to spare the uppers from the trials and tribulations the lowers would be forced to endure.
One always hopes not, of course. But it seems to me that the Leveson inquiry does establish, as Lee-Potter says, that the differences were only mildly camouflaged, and Brooks is merely the first major player to have stumbled in to the chasm that lies between the two.
The ones with 'ancestors and accents' believe in quiet, understated power these days, but power is still in their hands and the lesson for us all with the Brooks affair is - when you lie down with dogs - you catch fleas.