Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Adrian Lovett

GET UPDATES FROM Adrian Lovett
 

Millions of Lives Depend on Osborne's Aid Promise

Posted: 18/03/2012 23:00

For many of us, the British Chancellor's annual budget announcement is a familiar ritual. We watch out for the extra couple of pence on a pint of beer or a glass of wine. We wince at the inevitable hike at the petrol pumps and wait hopefully for a few pounds back in tax credit or personal allowance.

But the UK budget doesn't just matter to 60 million Brits. Admittedly, not many of the world's poorest people will be gathered around the television watching George Osborne at the despatch box on Wednesday - but for some of them, his words are a matter of life and death. ONE decided to get to the bottom of the figures and find out just how important they are.

Our report, Small Change, Big Difference, reveals, for the first time, the true impact of UK aid around the world. This new audit of British aid spending plans shows that UK aid will put 15.9 million children in school, protect 5.8 million mothers during childbirth, provide safe drinking water to 17 million people and help over 9 million people overcome malnutrition in the next four years.

But all this will only be achieved if the Chancellor confirms in this week's budget that the UK government will reach its target of investing 0.7% of national income in international aid next year. This new research makes it clear: now would be the worst possible time for Britain to walk away from its promise to the world's poorest. Not just because lives and futures depend on it, but also because in tough times, smart aid is not just good for the poorest countries. It's good for Britain too. Aid helps countries grow, and as they grow they become potential markets and trading partners for UK plc.

This isn't about creating a never ending cycle of aid. The ONE report demonstrates how UK aid will help bring forward the day when aid is no longer needed. In the next four years UK aid will help 77.6 million people access formal financial services, such as bank accounts or credit - the basics needed to start a business. And it will help create employment opportunities for 19.3 million people by investing in infrastructure, supporting entrepreneurs, developing markets to sell goods, encouraging trade and investment, and increasing agricultural productivity.

During David Cameron's recent visit to the United States he and Barack Obama said that "As two of the world's wealthiest nations, we embrace our responsibility as leaders in the development that enables people to live in dignity, health and prosperity." Cameron is right to recognise our responsibilities as a wealthy nation - and he also knows Britain's aid promise is affordable. Even at 0.7% of national income, UK aid will account for just 1.6 pence in every pound of government spending.

In tough economic times, keeping our aid promise is more important than ever. No other budget achieves so much for so little. The government's bilateral and multilateral aid reviews demonstrated its commitment to fund the most cost-effective projects available and just last week the Department for International Development (DfID) linked up with the Serious Organised Crime Agency to ensure that any allegations of misuse of funds are properly investigated. Nobody claims aid is perfect, but British aid is good and getting better.

Each of these statistics on their own is remarkable but together they add up to one of the wisest and most far-sighted investments our government can make. No one wants aid to continue forever but if done properly this is an investment that will save and transform lives, boost economic prospects and help to bring forward the day when extreme poverty - and aid itself - is a thing of the past.

 

Follow Adrian Lovett on Twitter: www.twitter.com/adrianlovett

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:18 AM on 03/20/2012
All overseas aid must be stopped.
04:16 AM on 03/20/2012
what about our lives ! never mind giving our hard earned money away !
this country is a political mess ! lets see how much more they will take of our minimum wage !
its a disgrace -we are taxed on everything -but tax office is not fit for purpose !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mickbono
huff is crap
04:29 PM on 03/19/2012
we have people in this country freezing to death in winter or starving to death because they cant afford heat & food , as the saying goes charity begins at home . how many billions have been handed to africa ? & since live aid the same pictures are shown every year kids from teenagers to one hanging off the tit , oh sorry its not the same pic its new pics showing the same thing everytime. give them contraception not money that is wasted by there corrupt governments.
04:09 PM on 03/19/2012
What worries me is this

"...In the next four years UK aid will help 77.6 million people access formal financial services, such as bank accounts or credit ..."

I can see the water projects, agricultural aid and training of people to roll out the two previous. That I can understand but financial services......I sodding well give up.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Adrian Lovett
09:08 PM on 03/19/2012
jake6257, I know what you mean - we often don't think of bank accounts when we think of aid, and you're right that water projects etc are still very important, but in the end we want people to be able to work their own way out of poverty. So I think financial services are important - and we're not talking about pensions and stocks here! Just the basics - a bank account that will allow a woman to set up a small business selling the extra crops she produces, that kind of thing. That turns the aid that you and I pay for into an investment, because in time you're going to see more people able to trade with us, buy our services and do business with us - as well as contributing more to their own economies through taxes and so on...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
famullar
03:45 PM on 03/19/2012
NORMALIZATION is the most effective way to improve public schools. What do I mean by that? It means teachers (and administrators) who are no longer members of an "elite" who work 6 hour days, can never be fired, get two automatic raises yearly regardless of competency, have all summer off with PAY (plus Xmas and Easter breaks and numerous other holidays), and who retire a full 15 years earlier than the parents of their students (and who get 88% of final wage, starting at age 52). Oh, did I mention "free gold-plated health insurance for life" with no copays or deductibles? THAT is the problem in American education -- that is what has led us to failure despite the fact we pay MORE (a lot more) than any other industrialized western nation per student! Because the money does not go to the education of students -- it goes to lux benefits for teachers and administrators. When we change that, when we make teachers and administrators accountable to PARENTS and taxpayers -- when we stop supporting them in a Socialist Worker's Paradise and hiring people who ARE competent....the current system, which she adores, makes that impossible. The pay of the teacher is peanuts . I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA
12:35 PM on 03/19/2012
It isnt food or wells or medical supplies africa needs,its mass sterilisation,they wine and moan about children dying,then stop having children,when there are no resorces to feed them,
09:07 AM on 03/19/2012
stop aid immediately to Pakistan and India and any other country with a nuclear deterent.Pakistan is a country who cost the UK and the US a great deal of money by not handing over Bin Laden when they knew where he was (500 yards from their military headquarters).The burden for foreign aid should be shared and controlled by an International agency with EVERY country contributing on a pro rata basis.GB must stop being a soft touch.
06:15 AM on 03/19/2012
[b][url=http://www.celineluggage.com/]celine[/url] the globe renowned high-class company. [url=http://www.celineluggage.com/]celine bags[/url] incorporate [b][url=http://www.celineluggage.com]celine purse[/url][/b] and the like. The modern [url=http://www.celineluggage.com/]celine bags[/url] developer take your a new many new amount. [url=http://www.celineluggage.com/]céline handbags[/url] features a lot of sorts of resources along with hues. It doesn't matter you wish to get image all the time as well as inside qualifications in the demonstrate position, it does not take brilliant one particular, which enable it to cause you to be attractive[/b].
photo
novelist2000
veritas non olet
05:53 AM on 03/19/2012
I am not a great fan of aid because in most countries people do not make an effort to have smaller families. They go for quantity, not quality, and essentially that is their right. But after a couple of decades they should have learnt. In Africa you only ever see women trying to take care of their children, often five, seven or thereabouts. No woman can make enough money to provide for these family sizes. So - we have been sending aid for more than 50 years. We still send aid, and in 20 years, they turn up in Gibraltar, Lampedusa, Paris or London. Sorry having to say that, but it's the reality, and veritas non olet.

Having said that, I do feel for people when I hear about the billions for new aircraft carriers, joint strike fighters, drones, and missile shields. Unlimited funds to destroy, crumbs to build up.
12:06 AM on 03/19/2012
Our report, Small Change, Big Difference, reveals, for the first time, the true impact of UK aid around the world
-----------------------------------
We live in a democracy. We have the BBC. Yet your claim is true. But will you be telling us how costs break down? No. Aid spending should be viewed critically and holistically, not partially and laden with values which show bias. The British public are concered about aid money being wasted. I studied many reports in the late 90's. I was shocked by the way that overheads soared in order to get projects moving. Every big man's cousin seemed to be a translator, security officer, driver, cleaner, or whatever.

The focus should, i think, change towards job creation. You want water - train the workers to get it. You want better health, train health workers. Providing technical services just creates long-term maintenance headaches and more overheads. I know there is a NGO trend in this direction but from the Government we hear no detail, Nothing in the media. No BBC coverage. Like it is a secret.
12:20 AM on 03/19/2012
The British public already know that aid is wasted and often falls into the wrong hands. What they are concerned about is the fact that we pay more than many other countries and everything we hold dear in our own country is being ruthlessly slashed.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Adrian Lovett
10:26 AM on 03/19/2012
Hi madkerrui, Britain is generous with aid, but not the most generous - we're 7th in the league table of 23 wealthy countries. You're right that British people want to ensure every penny of aid is well spent - so do we. That's why we did our report today - to look at what real difference it's actually making. We know these are tough times at home, but the aid budget costs about a penny in every pound of government spending. If you cut, it won't solve our budget problems - and the impact on some of the world's poorest people would be devastating.
09:10 AM on 03/19/2012
You have hit the nail on the head.Much of our aid goes to corrupt regimes who couldn`t care less about their own people;we should take care of our own first and foremost.No country with a nuclear deterent should expect or receive aid.
11:26 PM on 03/18/2012
How long have we been pouring aid into Africa? Nothing ever seems to change. It is time to look after our own needy.