Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Alex T

GET UPDATES FROM Alex T
 

Oscar Pistorius: The Fallen Hero Affirmed What I Already Knew

Posted: 26/02/2013 12:33

The sharpest tragedy in the Pistorius scandal is the death of a young, intelligent woman - Reeva Steenkamp. Yet, the whole episode also threatens to strike a dagger into last year's Olympic legacy. For all that Pistorius did to prove the irrelevance of disability; he is now the blade runner that malfunctioned.

I am not one for heroes, and have always vehemently distanced myself from idolising prominent disabled people for the sake of it. Growing up as a wheelchair user in the 1990s, I was the only disabled person at my mainstream school. The reference points for my future were warped. Society dictated I either set diminished ambitions, or looked up to Stephen Hawking - a physically incapacitated, scientific genius.

Neither fitted. As such, Steven Gerrard and Malcolm X became my inspirations - the former for his tenacity and the latter for his struggle to overcome. Disability clung to me, but I had long outgrown its confines. Yet, in this empowerment lay deep visionary isolation.

Then Pistorius emerged, embodying everything I knew to be possible. Muscular like a race horse, he exuded confidence, the trademark sunglasses covering a gaze of steely determination. Every time the South African sprung into a race, his running obliterated boundaries on and off the track. Best of all this desire knew no limits. The first time I saw him was at the London Olympics, racing against able bodied athletes. In doing so, the man made quite clear who was in charge of body and ambition. With or without the blades, he towered 100 foot tall over his disability and demanded others do the same.

Most refreshing and inspiring was the way he transcended those before him to become a mainstream star; standing toe to toe with big name celebrities, both through status and endorsement deals. In a world obsessed with image, he proved disabled people could meet the test: attaining the spacious mansion and fast car, offering sex appeal and, as we now know so well, successfully wooing a beautiful, intelligent model.

These are things that, bluntly, were assumed to lie outside the reach of those with disabilities.

Therefore, upon hearing about the tragic events on 14 February, my overwhelming feeling was a mixture of sadness and frustration. Pistorius had done so much more than cross the finish line to win medals, he was running beyond. Yet, one moment of grave consequence has seen the progress slip through his fingers. It doesn't matter if he fired the fatal bullet or owns the bloodied bat, Pistorius faces death by association; discredited further by reports of steroids found in his home.

My dreams, and those held by thousands of other disabled people, now lie without their brightest symbol.

However, rather than suffocate in dejection, now is the time to realise that it is naive to place faith in heroes. I admired Pistorius not because of what he conveyed to millions, but because he affirmed what I already knew to be true.

 

Follow Alex T on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ykts_net

FOLLOW CANADA
The sharpest tragedy in the Pistorius scandal is the death of a young, intelligent woman - Reeva Steenkamp. Yet, the whole episode also threatens to strike a dagger into last year's Olympic legacy. Fo...
The sharpest tragedy in the Pistorius scandal is the death of a young, intelligent woman - Reeva Steenkamp. Yet, the whole episode also threatens to strike a dagger into last year's Olympic legacy. Fo...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 43
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:53 on 17/03/2013
"It doesn't matter if he fired the fatal bullet or owns the bloodied bat"

With that line, Alex T, you demonstrate you didn't even follow the bail hearing yet presume to be able to write about the case. Based on what? Trashy tabloid sensationalism?

Firstly, that Pistorius fired the shots is not for debate. He has never denied this. Why and how could or would he? There was no one else there. What is on trial are the circumstances and intention. Did he intend to murder Reeva (unlikely, as he would've had ample opportunity to do so before she would've even made it to the toilet or could've waited for her to come out, which she would've had to eventually, or could've beaten the door down first, rather than afterwards, and taken straight aim at her) or did he think it was an intruder (which under SA law would render it culpable homicide, regardless of whether the intention was to scare, injure or kill)?

Secondly, the use of the "bloodied bat" was media speculation and it's frankly embarrassing to still be suggesting it was used to attack Reeva, bearing in mind Pistorius' affidavit explaining the use of the bat to knock down the door after he realised Reeva was not in the bed/bedroom AND, more to the point, the prosecution's statement at the bail hearing and Reeva's family's affirmation afterwards that she had no signs of assault or of self-defence injuries. Her only wounds or markings were gunshots.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex T
21:56 on 26/03/2013
Please see the date this was published. The points you make were not evident then. The article wasn't about the court case, but about the wider cultural impact. Is that not clear?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
waldopepper
I'd tell you all about me if you were my friend.
23:17 on 26/02/2013
The story, the tragedy is a violence against women story first and foremost.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex T
13:41 on 28/02/2013
Agreed. Read the first sentence.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
waldopepper
I'd tell you all about me if you were my friend.
19:30 on 28/02/2013
Yet you concentrate to the exclusion of that issue on how it will impact of the Olympics. The first sentence does not absolve you of such neglect and miss appropriation of attention to what should be the focus of society on this ghastly tragedy. For shame.
11:10 on 17/03/2013
How so?

If Pistorius' version of events is shown to be true (and bear in mind that at the bail hearing, the prosecution stated that as yet it had found no evidence to refute his version - something that played a huge part in his being granted bail), how is this a case of violence against women?

Sadly, a woman was the unfortunate victim but under the perceived intruder scenario, one would have to absurdly expect Pistorius to have considered the possibility that the intruder may have been a woman?

Reeva had no injuries on her other than the bullet wounds and no fresh or mature signs of assault. Claims that Pistorius has a history of violence against women were also media exaggeration. The only call to police from his property was in 2009 when he threw a drunken guest out of a party. A drunken guest that happened to be female. He slammed the door, she kicked it and splintered her foot so reported him for "assault". Go figure.

I do wish some people would stop doing the very serious cause of violence against women (or domestic violence in general, because it's not just male on female) such an injustice or insult its victims (of which I have been one) so immensely by mentioning it in the same breath as a case that, as yet, has shown no relevance to the issue.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
22:48 on 26/02/2013
By the way, to everyone in a wheelchair who thought Pastorius was a hero....I want you to know that to me and countless others with four full working limbs, YOU ARE ALL HEROES. Seriously, every time I see someone out and about in a wheelchair I consciously think 'WOWwow' and admire you because I just don't think I'd be up to the challenge.
23:22 on 26/02/2013
Yes, I do so agree with you.
23:23 on 26/02/2013
I agree 100%.
21:47 on 26/02/2013
Terry Fox is the only icon I ever dared buy into.
20:33 on 26/02/2013
Get over your hang up with Oscar, he's smoke N mirrors. Without steroids the blade runner would just be a guy referred to as stumpy and no one would have ever heard his name. The quest to win & be the best in sport holds more traction that life itself for many athletes. Oscar was no different, except he should have read the fine print of the steroid label. The fine print being using steroid my cause uncontrollable rage, known as roid rage, which may lead one to completely unhinged, like Oscar did that fateful night.
19:46 on 26/02/2013
you mean to say that people with physical disabilities are no different than anyone else? SHOCKING!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
17:53 on 26/02/2013
Really the drive to win/acheive at all cost borders on a personality disorder.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex T
18:34 on 26/02/2013
Not related to Pistorius.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SeanMartin
Everything in moderation.
20:13 on 26/02/2013
Actually, in his case, I would say it is. And I would say that regardless of whether the person involved was physically disabled or not. All one has to do is look at the "successful" folk who were anything but hero stock and yet are treated as such. He's no different from them.
17:24 on 26/02/2013
... it's a bit like Lance Armstrong.

The scandal is unfortunate (Tragic, in this case); hopefully it does not undo all of the good that came before.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex T
17:52 on 26/02/2013
I agree, I did think about drawing comparisons with Lance.
20:41 on 26/02/2013
Nothing like Lance (who is as far from tragic as one can get)

He was a lying drug-pusher who destroyed the lives of anyone who got in his way while lying to the American public to line his pockets with millions.

Worse, he used cancer-support as a shield to deflect any criticism of him - despicable!

A psycopath by definition - look it up.
21:48 on 26/02/2013
I get the sense that you think using your sucessful charity to hide from doping allegations is worse than beating your girlfriend with a cricket bat, then shooting her?  ... if you want to make the comparison, Lance comes off looking like a saint.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
17:14 on 26/02/2013
Did you ever hear of Rick Hansen? "In 1973, at the age of 15, Rick Hansen’s life changed forever. He was involved in an accident that paralyzed him from the waist down. Coming to terms with his new life, he found inspiration from teachers, coaches and family, and set new goals from new dreams. Rick went on to become one of Canada's most decorated Paralympic athletes.

In March 1985, Rick set off from Vancouver to wheel 40,000 kilometres through 34 countries on the Man In Motion World Tour to prove the potential of people with disabilities. His 26-month journey inspired an entire nation to believe anything is possible and moved thousands to make a difference.

After the Tour, he established the Rick Hansen Foundation to find a cure for spinal cord injuries and create more accessible communities.

Since 1988, the Foundation has leveraged the $26 million raised during the Tour into $280 million in investments towards spinal cord research, accessibility projects and quality of life initiatives.

Join us in building a healthy, inclusive world."
http://www.rickhansen.com/language/en-CA/Who-We-Are.aspx
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex T
15:57 on 01/03/2013
Very interesting, I had no idea. Thanks Marion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopgeorge
Paper Ballots WORK. Unverifiable e-voting doesn't
17:10 on 26/02/2013
I don't understand how he was allowed to race against able-bodied runners in the Olympics.

He's got a technological advantage that the other athletes don't, doesn't he?
17:22 on 26/02/2013
If swimsuits represent technology that must be banned from the olympics, so would these legs.

But you're missing the point; this man was an inspiration to those with disabilities. Allowing his participation embodies the spirit of the olympics. They knew he wasn't going to win before the event; the point was that he can be competative at a world class level; and inspire.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex T
17:47 on 26/02/2013
I couldn't have put it better.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopgeorge
Paper Ballots WORK. Unverifiable e-voting doesn't
18:10 on 26/02/2013
Everyone can wear those swimsuits. Not so with the blades.

I'm not missing the point. I understand the inspirational aspect, but the point I was making still stands.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Alex T
17:43 on 26/02/2013
I've heard this argument many times. To be clear: Pistorius gained no advantage; athletes using prosthetic limbs suffer much slower starts as they have to build up momentum throughout the race.

Just because it looks different, does not mean it affords him an advantage.

Regarding the legitimacy of him running against abled bodied runners...well...this is exactly why his actions on the track will be missed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scoville Scale
Canadian Contrarian
16:54 on 26/02/2013
So often, we look to others to embody the ideals we hold dear, when rather it should be us who are strive to bring those things to life.
16:41 on 26/02/2013
Where there's one, there will be more. No matter what, Oscar Pistorius will have opened a floodgate to all the possibilities.