Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Alistair Burt

GET UPDATES FROM Alistair Burt
 

Countering the Spread of WMDs

Posted: 09/12/11 00:00 GMT

Countering the spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction is one of the most important challenges we face in building a peaceful and secure 21st century. Whilst public attention is always focussed on nuclear issues, that doesn't just mean countering those illegal weapons programmes.

It also means eradicating the threat of chemical and biological weapons. Nowhere is the challenge more urgent and complex than in the Middle East. Often the picture can seem bleak, particularly in the light of the concerns over Iran's nuclear programme laid out in the recent IAEA report. But I believe in recent months, green shoots have emerged which give some tentative grounds for optimism.

An excellent example of this is the attitude of the new Libyan regime. This week I returned from Tripoli where I met with several Ministers from the recently appointed temporary government. They reassured me that the new Libyan authorities recognise fully the importance of making a new start by dealing with WMD matters in a responsible and transparent manner.

They will require international help and we are working with key partners, including the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, to provide assistance and advice.

Similarly, in September, States in the Middle East accepted Finland and Jaako Laajava's offer to host and facilitate a conference in 2012 on creating a WMD free zone in the Middle East.

While this might be a small step, just a few years ago the very idea of holding such a conference would have been unthinkable. The fact we are making cautious progress towards it gives me further grounds to be positive. A successful conference presents the region with a rare opportunity for deep and genuine discussion about proliferation issues and it is essential that this opportunity is recognised and seized upon by all parties.

Beyond the Middle East, we and our international partners are working on several fronts to counter the spread of these weapons. Before arriving in Libya I attended the five-yearly review conference of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention in Geneva. This was the first multilateral disarmament treaty banning an entire category of weapons of mass destruction. It has 165 State Parties - a significant achievement and one which is of great importance in efforts to control WMD. While great efforts are spent stopping countries who violate the agreements, it is easy to forget the vast majority of states who quietly abide by their commitments and work to support these vital international instruments which help safeguard our security.

On top of this, every day diplomats and scientist around the world are working to overcome the political, diplomatic and technical challenges associated with countering the spread of WMD. Just last month the UK hosted a meeting of technical experts in Edinburgh to discuss detection of covert nuclear weapons tests, and last week we held an international workshop on our long standing initiative with Norway on the technical challenges of verifying nuclear disarmament.

However, we are under no illusions as to the scale of the challenges ahead. Political will and mutual confidence will play a key part in any significant moves forward, and they need to be in great supply. While the concept of the Middle East Conference sounds straightforward, ensuring that all the right players are around the table next year will be no mean feat. The new Libyan regime will require all the support we can give it.

Despite the success of the BTWC, there are still 31 states that remain outside the Convention, some of them in the Middle East region. Foremost in our minds is Iran's nuclear programme which continues to threaten global security. Whilst considering these serious concerns it is important that we don't forget to nurture the green shoots which will provide the foundations of lasting stability, and build the confidence we all need.

 

Follow Alistair Burt on Twitter: www.twitter.com/foreignoffice

Countering the spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction is one of the most important challenges we face in building a peaceful and secure 21st century. Whilst public attention is always focussed on nucle...
Countering the spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction is one of the most important challenges we face in building a peaceful and secure 21st century. Whilst public attention is always focussed on nucle...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:37 PM on 12/12/2011
the btwc (biological and toxic weapons convention) has been signed and ratified in the united states, but that has not stopped the research, manufacture and storage of such weapons by the u.s. this kind of research, production and storage requires highly educated people and vast sums of money that is only found in nations with huge military budgets. as usual the u.s. spends more than the rest of the world combined on biologic and toxic warfare.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:09 AM on 12/12/2011
Biological, toxin and nuclear weapons can kill. A fully laiden air force can also be pretty devastating, as can an artillery barrage, and an infantry assault. But presumably these don't count.

"WMD" has little meaning beyond politically-driven hysteria and posturing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jerryengelbach
Working class heritage
02:10 AM on 12/12/2011
Interesting political nonspeak implying that anyone who does not already have WMDs has no right to have them.

Nothing about the countries that already do have them getting rid of them.

Like the U.K. Like the U.S. Like Israel.

Smug little bureaucric worm.
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
06:47 PM on 12/11/2011
John Bolton's ravings delivered with a charming British accent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
06:22 PM on 12/11/2011
More war against Iran propaganda. Niiice.
photo
wom122
Primum non nocere
09:47 PM on 12/10/2011
"Foremost in our minds is Iran's nuclear programme which continues to threaten global security"

Might as well have cut to the chase right from the beginning and spared us the worn out WMD refrain.
photo
Talab
I tot i taw a putty tat
02:01 PM on 12/10/2011
The one fact zionists can never get around is that Israel is belligerent with all of it's neighbors , Israel has nukes and wont sign the NPT or allow inspections . Your "article" is only about keeping Israel free to do anything it wants to it's neighbors without check
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
11:22 PM on 12/09/2011
This is the second blog in a week by a member of the "Conservative Friends of Israel" UK lobby.
I guess the first one wasn't enough.
11:06 PM on 12/09/2011
Even the generals at the Pentagon say that lran needs nuclear weapons to defend itself from its nuclear enemies threatenin­­­­­g war against Iran. It's time to stop the AlPAC war propaganda of the US mainstream media. It cannot be the case that no country in the middle east has nuclear weapons except the entity. Either no one has nuclear weapons, or all can have nuclear weapons. Double standards must end.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Vapula
Failure is not an option
10:24 PM on 12/09/2011
Like countering the spread of WMDs in Iraq which didn't have them. The rumors about these WMDs seem to be a guise to start wars and perhaps we should be more concerned with countering the spread of wars and hatred. If people did not hate each other so much there would be no WMDs, but killing people on suspicion that they have WMDs is a sure way to ensure that someone hostile to you will eventually get WMDs.
09:04 PM on 12/09/2011
There is only one country in the middle east with wmd's, and that's Israel.
But you didn't mention them at all.
It makes me think you aren't really that interested in WMDs
12:37 PM on 12/09/2011
I'm right behind the other posters on this thread, either no-one has these weapons or everyone needs them to keep sovereign territory, we don't need world police just so its easy to march into a country not in agreement with the west, disarm and leave each other in peace.
04:55 AM on 12/09/2011
Mr Burt (of the Foreign Office no less) would like us to believe that a stockpile of nuclear weapons is only a threat to world peace if in the hands of the "wrong" govt. He has shown his true colours by focusing on the fact that Iran has a desire to develop a nuclear program. We have heard it all before. Remember Iraq? After the destruction of Iran (now in the planning stage), what next? President Bush's revelation list the countries due for demolition (axis of evil). There will be no power left capable of preventing the current expansionist policy of Israel.
Any country on a permanent military footing must always be at war. Where to next? North Korea? How about Cuba? Here is a country that can't fight back.
Making a pact with Libya at this time is a pointless exercise because the Transitional Council is not an elected govt with a mandate to make deals. It is no more than a group of men friendly to the west, whose only purpose should be to make arrangements for the election of a legitimate govt. We are deliberately looking in the wrong direction for threats to world peace.
01:17 AM on 12/09/2011
While you are worrying hugely about Iran (and nobody wants to see another state with nuclear weapons), please remember to call Israel to account for its absolute refusal to sign the NNPT, refusal to allow any inspection of its nuclear facilities, and widely known, though not admitted, 200 - 400 nuclear warheads.