Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Andrew Gonsalves
 

How to Make a Beautiful Building - Have a King Commission It

Posted: 12/03/2012 23:00

2012-03-11-HermitageWinterPalacesnow.JPG

There are a number of reasons why I'm a monarchist. The sense of history, the pomp and circumstance, the fact that the Windsors, or the Bourbons or the Bernardottes are a tangible link to a past that was probably better than the present (if you were the mid-range aristo I'm sure I would've been).

But the overriding reason I like prostrate at the royal font is beauty; pure, aesthetic joy.

Take architecture as a case in point:

The system of royalty that governed Europe until about 1918 is responsible for the most beautiful buildings on the continent. Under a republican system, places so utterly exquisite I find it hard to believe man created them would never have existed.

The Schönbrunn in Vienna, Berlin's Potsdam complex, Schloss Eszterháza in Hungary, and, of course, Versailles, none of them would be here without the system of kings and princes that our not so distant forebears kicked out.

In my humble opinion the last one hundred years have resulted in some of the most aesthetically displeasing architecture in human history.

Rows of identikit buildings, designed by with set squares and rulers and precious little else. Architecture in this egalitarian age is a world of concrete Orwellian behemoths and glass superstructures which may be impressive but lack any sort of beauty.

Yes the architects of old built on a grand scale, (Frederick the Great built the New Palace in Potsdam primarily as an exercise in showing off, while Louis XIV's continual building over the course of his 72-year-reign left the French state on the verge of broke), but the architectural inspirations were entirely different.

Palaces were built to honour their owners, as temples to their triumph and churches to their family's good name. But the way they were building was inspired by glory, virtue, divine intervention, the desire to produce something as aesthetically pleasing rather than simply being huge for the sake of being huge.

Republicanism doesn't achieve the same results.

As far as I'm aware there are no buildings of outstanding beauty in Switzerland, anything built but the Russian Communists is monstrous and the if you use Berlin as your yardstick its clear that the Germans haven't built an attractive building since the fall of the House of Hohenzollern.

The remaining European monarchies are all constitutional, and the royal families have as much real power as you or I, perhaps even less in some respects, so their power to influence taste and design has waned.

Over here we've given power to people called Tony and Dave, and we've ended up with the 30 St Mary Axe, which people refer to as a gherkin, and the Lloyds Building, which, inexplicably, has been listed in spite of it looking like a giant Portaloo.

Throughout history, glorious men and women of the blood royal have left as with stunning reminders of their existence - we're leaving behind City Hall, which looks a bit like a testicle.

 

Follow Andrew Gonsalves on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ALGonsalves

There are a number of reasons why I'm a monarchist. The sense of history, the pomp and circumstance, the fact that the Windsors, or the Bourbons or the Bernardottes are a tangible link to a past tha...
There are a number of reasons why I'm a monarchist. The sense of history, the pomp and circumstance, the fact that the Windsors, or the Bourbons or the Bernardottes are a tangible link to a past tha...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MexiChick67
Que? Que? Queee?
10:44 PM on 03/15/2012
Time gives buildings a warmth that new buildings lack. Sadly, here in the States once a building is starting to build up that patina that it is torn down for a new shiny building. Yuck. Preservationists have to fight long and hard to keep older buildings up. Sad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J Rupel
"Let the lamp affix its beam..."
10:24 PM on 03/14/2012
The United States has never had a king*, so I guess we don't have any beautiful buildings?

*(not counting the colonies under HRH, any of the assorted native "kings," or the current Pharaoh)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:44 AM on 03/14/2012
Pure tripe of an article. Celebrating architecture of the less than 1%. An architecture built upon feudalism, serfs, slavery, and imperialism. To admire it is one thing but to do so without an examination of its foundations in greed and exploitation while spouting the fairytale myths of glory and 'honour' is plain silly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:08 AM on 03/14/2012
It is true that when you are not caught up in the monarchy
England
returns to its beautiful old self..
its been a bit of a refreshing week.
10:23 PM on 03/13/2012
If City Hall resembles a testicle, what does the gherkin resemble?
09:32 PM on 03/13/2012
Interesting article, and while I admire the work of Zaha Hadid and other modern architects I wouldn't live in any of it. The classical proportions and the aesthetic that flourished up until the early 20th century just seem more suitable for human beings. Somehow more civilised.

I also think we chronically underestimate the the importance and the impact our environment. There was a nice series of programmes on channel 4 (http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-secret-life-of-buildings) which looked into how the building we live and work in affect us.
08:33 PM on 03/13/2012
Some examples of places with wonderful buildings and no monarchy:
Venice and Florence and a couple of hundred other commune cities of Italy. The Roman Republic. Ancient Greek Republics. Autonomous Medieval cities of the German Lands, the Low countries and the Baltic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sandra Stipp
07:55 PM on 03/13/2012
In my humble opinion the last one hundred years have resulted in some of the most aesthetically displeasing architecture in human history.

I totally agree. We have no flair or imagination. We are starting to live in trailer cars stacked upon each other. Ugly building everywhere.
photo
Moksha von Mew Mew
Diapers and Politicians should be changed often
03:11 PM on 03/13/2012
All architecture is beautiful
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
michelleobamaok
Tampa Crookpalooza 2012!
05:57 PM on 03/13/2012
Even Jack-in-the-Box?
10:16 PM on 03/13/2012
Please, where do you live? I want to move there!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Konnie
GOP = GOLDEN CALF OLD PARTY
10:17 PM on 03/12/2012
whatever their motivations, it was a state jobs project and put the peons to work with payment for their efforts, for everything from clearing the land, to digging the foundations, to sewing silk curtains and building furniture, painting the portraits of the nobles, their cows, dogs and horses, and the frame carvers. not counting the untold hundreds to keep it staffed, maintained and functioning. sounds like the precursor of the WPA to me.
08:34 PM on 03/13/2012
peons?