Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Andrew Smith

GET UPDATES FROM Andrew Smith
 

The Break-up of Britain is Underway, and the Olympics Will Do Nothing to Reverse it

Posted: 22/07/2012 15:48

As the Queen sailed up the Thames this year she unwittingly summed up exactly what it means to be British today. The flotilla itself was the perfect symbolism of where we find ourselves as a nation right now; it began with all kinds of pomp, pageantry and manufactured festivity, and then it was ruined by the rain. As I, and thousands like me, hid in the shops and pubs that line our great river we had that all too familiar feeling that we wished we had just stayed at home. Within the space of an hour or so of rain we had seen the spectacle of the British state, which had been flapping its flags and flaunting its colours like a proud peacock, being reduced to a damp rain-soaked squib.

Back up the road in my home country of Scotland there was little to shout about. Of the 9500 street parties that happened across the UK only 60 were in Scotland (0.60%), and 20 of those were organised by the Orange Order. Was this lack of enthusiasm for British triumphalism a one-off blip? We'll soon find out.

Even as a supporter of the Olympics there are times when I find it hard to see what most people in London are getting from them, other than a great deal of inconvenience, G4S related ridicule and severely delayed transport. However, I find it even harder to see what the rest of the country is supposed to be getting. Sure, we may all have gone out to watch the torch, but we have paid over £14 billion as a nation and we aren't even being given the pleasure of seeing David Beckham kicking a ball for Team GB.

I don't get the impression that people outside London are angry about the Olympics, I don't see any evidence that anyone is particularly against them or wants them to flop, but I don't see any evidence of enthusiasm for them either, and the thousands of unsold tickets for events in Glasgow and Cardiff only add to that feeling. A recent BBC poll found that 74% of people do not think that the rest of Britain will benefit from the games, with the poll showing Scotland, Wales and northern England as the areas where Olympic enthusiasm is at its lowest. Like the Jubilee, it feels as if the Olympics are more of a regional celebration than a national one.

At the same time Britain is coming under increasing pressure to review our relations with the rest of Europe, and more importantly the people of Scotland are preparing to vote in a referendum that could end the United Kingdom as we know it. The stakes are high for both sides, but even if the unionists are to win the immediate battle (which is what the polls are indicating at this early stage) then it seems unlikely that they can ever win the war. The key point which has come out in the debate about Scotland's future is that in domestic terms the country is on a very different political trajectory from the parliament in Westminster. Rightfully or wrongly (and I think rightfully) the parliament are pursuing a more traditionally social democratic model of governance rather than the classically neo-liberal one of the government down here. This difference was perhaps epitomised last April when on the same day as prescription charges were abolished in Scotland they reached a record price in England.

Whatever the result, the current settlement is not a sustainable one; the coalition government only have the backing of one third of voters in Scotland (according to the 2010 General Election results, although the Scottish elections last year were far harsher) and the Tories have only one MP in the entire country. On top of this, polls suggest that English and Welsh voters are keener to see Scotland going it alone than Scots are. All of the parties who support the union are starting to demand extra powers for the Scottish Parliament, and all polling suggests the public wants the same thing. After less than 15 years the devolved parliaments have already gained significant powers, so does anyone really expect the current settlement to be the end of the road for British federalism?

If Scots choose to become independent then short of a Royal Baby these games may be the last official celebration that these island shares. This summer was supposed to be a highpoint in 21st century Britishness and a chance for the people of these islands to rally together and unite as one, but at the moment it feels more like a not very glorious last hurrah of a fractured and increasingly incompatible and irrelevant political union. Once the post Olympic bunting has come down what will we be left with? A bunch of empty sports venues, a £multi-billion debt and an increasingly disunited kingdom.

 

Follow Andrew Smith on Twitter: www.twitter.com/andrew_graeme

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
As the Queen sailed up the Thames this year she unwittingly summed up exactly what it means to be British today. The flotilla itself was the perfect symbolism of where we find ourselves as a nation ri...
As the Queen sailed up the Thames this year she unwittingly summed up exactly what it means to be British today. The flotilla itself was the perfect symbolism of where we find ourselves as a nation ri...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 243
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
01:56 AM on 08/08/2012
The UK state established in 1707 and the island of Great Britain are two separate things, especially as the UK includes northern Ireland. The British Isles will remain connected even if Cornwall got independence!....I can still visit Ireland quite easily now, so why not the rest!

Why cry over the end of the centralised UK state...there will still be the connected island of Great Britain
photo
SecularAdvocate
Media Watcher
10:30 PM on 07/29/2012
As you're so brilliant at predicting the future, try www.betfair.com.

I bet you'll be broke within a month.

Don't bet your last tenner. Buy a book about chaos theory.

Things are more complex than you think.
12:01 AM on 07/29/2012
Why is it that people in high positions think that events like the olympics will bring in more money. It won't, because people come to the event, for the event, not as tourists. The notion that they will come back is rediculous, as they have no reason to come. If they are that interested in the U.K. they would have already come. No country has made money out of the post olympics, look at Greece.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DJPotterWriter
06:44 PM on 07/26/2012
Good article. But, two things. Firstly, overall turnout at the 2010 general election was only 65%. So, actually, the combined vote for the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democrats in the United Kingdom overall was more like 30%. With similar turn-out in Scotland, the combined vote there was more like 20%. Also, we don't know how people would have voted, if there had been no tactical voting. And we don't know how people would have voted, had they known a coalition would be formed. The real story is not lack of support for this particular government, but the total disengagement of a significant minority of the electorate.

Also, it's a bit trite to talk about the current government as being 'neoliberal'. Prescription charges were introduced by Churchill's 'post-war consensus' Conservative government in 1952, only four years after the NHS had been established. Prescription charges were most recently reintroduced by Harold Wilson's Labour government in 1968. The other major plank of 'social-democratic' Scotland is the abolition of university tuition fees, but those fees were introduced not by the coalition, but by Tony Blair's Labour government in 1998. I don't think there's anything particularly 'neoliberal' about the current government. There's been no serious cut in taxation or regulation.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Andrew Smith
03:41 PM on 07/27/2012
Thanks for your feedback DJPotterWriter

Fair point about their support not factoring in a low turnout. In reality you're right, closer to only 1 in 5 people in Scotland would have voted for this government. You're right, it's impossible to say how many would have voted that way if they had known the outcome beforehand, possibly the best measuring yard is the Scottish elections in 2011 when the Tories got about 16% and the Lib Dems got close to 4%, although as turnout was barely 50% this could be seen as only 10%, their combined vote share was probably split in half. The point is that this government do not have a mandate in Scotland, in contrast the labour governments since 1997 have all had at least 40% of the vote and the clear majority of Scottish MPs.

I would argue that they are a neoliberal government who are ideologically tied to market solutions and Thatcherite policies. I would argue that Blair was too, albeit with more compassion than the current lot.
01:34 AM on 07/26/2012
Well Andrew, I think that pretty well sums it up!
10:57 PM on 07/24/2012
In my last log I meant to say i am sick of the olympics and you CAN NOT get away from them
10:55 PM on 07/24/2012
i am so sick of the olympics, You turn the tv on and you can get away from it, I want to watch real news..

The real reason I am sick of the olympics is that this country can not afford the olympics, I have said that from day one. We will be left with a legacy of empty stadiums, Illiegal immigrants, corruption, a drop in house prices in london, and all this will need to be compensated for by people like me - a high rate tax payer
07:04 PM on 07/29/2012
As a result of the number of BBC channels dedicated to the olympics, the viewing figures for 'The Professionals', and 'Minder', on ITV4, should increase enormously over the next fortnight.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark B Robertson
10:09 PM on 07/24/2012
Whether it's a long tortuous journey via more devolution, and a short speedy divorce to Independence, as long as we escape the horror of Westminster and its festering criminal elite.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lordmak
the pen is mightier than the sword.
09:02 PM on 07/24/2012
a very nice read. doomy and gloomy but so true.
being scottish, i am going to tell you where i stand on the political issue touched on there.
i for 1 do not 100per cent want to leave the uk but we are being governed just now by a bunch of theives and liars. whom we never voted for. the conservative party are known in scotland as being anti british and anti scottish. now they are running our country. seriously if the conservatives are still in power on the big day. scotland will leave the uk it is as simple as that. alex salmond will use this to win.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
11:31 PM on 07/24/2012
Slan leat and please close the door when you cross Hadrians wall !
photo
hearthammer
If left is right and right is wrong, decide!
08:39 AM on 07/25/2012
Slan Abhaile and good luck to you with rule from Paris!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lordmak
the pen is mightier than the sword.
12:42 PM on 07/25/2012
listen my friend. this might be a funny thing to a lot of the english but let me asssure you. there is no bigger threat to the united kingdom than this. if this did happen what do you think will be the outcome for england. politicaly no one in the world will listen or take any notice of a pm who just has a piece of an island. if you ask me. you guys south of the border had better start finding out whats the score here because if salmond gets his way . we are going to wake up in a diffrent world. as for the whinging scots you needs us just as much as we need you. its a partnership that has kept us safe all these years. the only thing breaking us up is a conservative goverment. we will never accept a conservative leader, ever. if you guys want the tories,, you can have them. we would rather be independant.
08:31 PM on 07/24/2012
Probably won't be long before Sparkbrook, Birmingham, secedes and goes under sharia law.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
11:31 PM on 07/24/2012
Long as the pay thier taxes
07:33 PM on 07/24/2012
I am of scottish origin and have lived in England for 34 years and I have watched successive governments destroy the UK as a whole.They have surrendered all our powers to govern and have given away all our assetts (Fishing,Coal and Manufacturing) No wonder everybody,all nations in the UK are sick of it. Scotland are getting a grip and will protect their assetts,shame about the Oil! Their looking after our needy is a step in the right direction. All the Westminister government is interested in letting immigration run out of control and tax everybody but the rich.
01:37 AM on 07/26/2012
So true, well said!
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
07:05 PM on 07/24/2012
I have half English and half Scottish blood (dad's side), and I sincerely hope the English & Scots can develop a more mature relationship after Scotland becomes independent. I can't stand this pathetic squabbling about who's better/wealthier/subsidising whom. Much better to split - then Scots can learn to blame their own politicians instead of constant sniping about the English -that'll be when the heady air of freedom has worn off, and reality has set in. As trading partners, maybe a little respect between us will develop. But I won't hold my breath - the English'll still be blamed for everything by some Scots.
08:22 PM on 07/24/2012
Again, one example of anti-Englishness would add a lot of credence to your claim.
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
09:47 AM on 07/25/2012
Andy Murray's well publicised wish that England should be beaten by another team - any other team - in the World Cup or Euros (whatever one it was); Scottish fans cheering on and wearing Argentina kit - stuff like that. This stuff is rooted in nationalism, and is not just a rejection of the Westminster elite, who we all dislike of course. You see loads of comments on various forums. If independence is what it takes to heal the historical wounds and obvious resentment of those particular Scots, so be it. I think we're stronger together than apart, but if enough people hold the view described above, then clearly the Union is no longer viable.
united dreamer
The meek shall inherit the earth, trust me
08:28 PM on 07/24/2012
Well only certain English will be blamed. The same English that are destroying the British economy as a whole. And you can have Fred the Shred;-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laatab
All The Worlds A Stage
07:03 PM on 07/24/2012
I must say as an Englishman if I was Scottish I would be looking to dump Westminster asap! England has become a vile state run by the greedy who have been alowed free rein to exploit the people of these isles.
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
07:07 PM on 07/24/2012
I think a culture shift is already underway, which started when millions of voters woke up to the massive con trick played by the tories and lib dems.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
11:18 PM on 07/24/2012
Why do you think Scotland joined the union with England in the first palce ? Beacuse greedy greedy clan leaders lsold out thier country people for money ! The Scots can write the book about treachery ! LOL ! At least the irish kept fighting until thier independence in 1921, the Scots jsut caved in and took the money ! No honour !
09:57 AM on 07/25/2012
Justin, Not the Scots, the nobles' caved in and took the money.
They earned the title of " Parcel of Rogues".
10:03 AM on 07/25/2012
You should try reading a history book because your post above bears no relation to actual events.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
u s of england
05:58 PM on 07/24/2012
scotland is beyond naive.
08:23 PM on 07/24/2012
No, we just border on the ridiculous...
united dreamer
The meek shall inherit the earth, trust me
08:30 PM on 07/24/2012
Beyond ridiculous then;-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
u s of england
08:36 PM on 07/24/2012
haha, thats actually really funny mate. well done you.
03:14 AM on 07/25/2012
"Scotland is beyond naive."

This is very true. Scotland was naive for a long time but has now progressed beyond this naivity and is hold a referendum.
06:15 AM on 07/28/2012
On a lighter note.

"Scotland is beyond naive."

Being a bit rude to our well respected Geordie neighbors, aren't you?
05:45 PM on 07/24/2012
London is our nations capital for God's sake, of course things are centralised here. As for the break up of Britain, that's nothing new and has been going on stealthily for the last 50 years, almost there!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:49 PM on 07/24/2012
Which nation would you be talking about there? London is the capital of England, so if it's England you're talking about that's grand. Edinburgh, Cardiff and Belfast are also capital cities, each in their own nations.
I suspect you're talking about the U.K. though. That isn't a real nation. Its a union made up of nations.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:34 PM on 07/24/2012
I think the UK can use a federal administrative area outside of London. Consider other Federal countries, the US has Washington D.C. and Canada has Ottawa, neither of which are state AND federal capitals because thats far from fair.
Then there could be "state" capitals like London, Belfast, Edinburgh, and Cardiff, and a more unifying capital city for the whole of the UK.
That ought to solve that problem, unless that problem is just a red herring you're throwing out there with no interest in seeing it fixed.
12:22 AM on 07/29/2012
London is not my nations capital. Once you understand this you'll have made a start on the basics.