Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Andy Langenkamp

GET UPDATES FROM Andy Langenkamp
 

Decisive Action Needs to Be Taken on the EU

Posted: 15/02/2012 00:00

The European crisis has unfolded in three stages. It started when the Great Recession set in. Soon afterwards, a political crisis broke out. Politicians failed to address the underlying causes of the recession. Now these economic and political setbacks have triggered the crisis of European unity.

Until a few years ago all looked promising. Most of the former communist countries in the East became part of the larger EU family as prosperity increased steadily. The process of an "ever closer union among the peoples of Europe" culminated in a common currency. For a while the sky seemed the limit. The EU's plans were very ambitious. It wanted to solve the Arab Israeli conflict, to become the world's leading innovator, and to guide the international community when it came to countering climate change. The EU was all set to become a superpower.

However, at the very first hurdle - the intractable peace process in the Middle East - cracks appeared in the Union's façade. In many ways, Europe is unable to make a fist. Lack of unity means that solidarity, a communal vision, and the preparedness to take concerted action drown in a sea of beautiful vistas and well-intentioned ideals. In the end both Israel and the Palestinians did not take Europe seriously at the negotiating table; the EU looked a fool.

Now the same is occurring in a different context. Individual countries do not show enough willingness to collaborate. Let alone make great sacrifices in order to stand together. Regardless of grandiloquent oratory, the "European people" does not really exist. Largely because there is no shared historical experience. Yes, symbols for a United States of Europe are in place. There is a flag, an anthem, and so on. Yet few people know or cherish these symbols. The individual nation states are still very much alive and kicking and are often prepared to disregard the will of their EU partners.

Europe's predicament can be explained from a historical perspective. Integration did not come about for happy reasons. The EU's predecessor was not founded to achieve glowing goals but to stave off further disaster. The world wars were still fresh in everybody's memory. "Never again" was the overriding motive behind European unification. The idea was to prevent military conflict.

Because it sprung from a negative impulse the European integration process has remained artificial. It has always been doubtful whether the Union would be strong enough to survive when times got tough. Political leaders, captains of industry, and the highly educated and mobile elite saw (and see) the advantages of unification. Many of them feel "European" to a degree. In contrast, the vast majority of the European population don't; they identify themselves only with their country and/or city.

As unity and a shared history are lacking, outright solidarity is often thin on the ground. This is one of the main reasons why many Germans (and the inhabitants of other countries with relatively strong economies such as the Dutch, the Fins, and the Austrians) are opposed to providing further aid to Greece. Perhaps the only time they feel a real connection to the Greek people is when they lounge on a Greek beach in the blistering sun during their summer holidays.

Europe's only hope is that it is still worth a lot in the eyes of the highly educated and the well-off, who realise that Europe without the EU could soon disintegrate in chaos. Plus, Europe can only hold its own against the US, China, and other (emerging) great powers if it acts as a bloc. European integration is vital to Europe's prosperity and wellbeing. This is why the European political establishment wants to keep the EU intact and why it has managed to plod on for a number of years. Apparently, the markets think that the eurozone stands a chance. Why else is the euro still overvalued vis-à-vis most other major currencies?

Yet that chance will dwindle if leaders continue to present half-baked proposals and initiatives and are constantly "behind the curve". Europe cannot muddle on forever. Economic storms, successful populists, authoritarian tendencies in eastern Europe, and faltering political leaders form a lethal mix in the eurozone. We still have hope that the politicians will get a grip in the nick of time. Yet it's time that is running out. Unless decisive action is taken within six months, the current economic and political trends could spell fatal trouble for Europe.

 
The European crisis has unfolded in three stages. It started when the Great Recession set in. Soon afterwards, a political crisis broke out. Politicians failed to address the underlying causes of the ...
The European crisis has unfolded in three stages. It started when the Great Recession set in. Soon afterwards, a political crisis broke out. Politicians failed to address the underlying causes of the ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:31 AM on 02/16/2012
Yes, why not expand the EU with the US and Rusia? Then we would be yet more powerful. And if we appoint a dictator we will finally be relieved of the problem that we are divided.

We could also say halt to the power hunger of the Brussels bureaucrats. We could tell them that the EU countries did very fine the last 60 years - despite all the division. We could remind them that one of the reasons that the EU economy seems to be slowing down must be the endless stream of rules from Brussels that slowly is changing our countries into a bureaucratic nightmare. We could tell them that we don't want the EU to act like the US - always on the look for the next victim of its need for violent "regime change" or equally violent "humanitarian intervention".

But why should we? They stopped listening to their citizens long ago.
05:52 PM on 02/15/2012
"Plus, Europe can only hold its own against the US, China, and other (emerging) great powers if it acts as a bloc."
That's never going to happen in the real world. China is growing at close to 10% pa and by the end of the decade will be twice the size and likely to be bigger than the US economy. EU growth has never been very high as it has never been interested in exporting to the rest of the world. Therefore unlike China it has not invested billions in research into new technological products that private companies can market throughout the world and so create 10% pa growth.
Unlike China the EU is inward looking. The EU elite believe growth stems from ever increasing central control. Unlike China they see private sector innovation having an insignificant role in wealth creation. Instead the EU believes that expansion of public sector jobs is the key to growth.
China is already at a similar technological level to the EU but with the massive investments they are making will be miles ahead by 2020. Then they will not only be Chinese competition for skilled work but they will almost certainly be ahead and have the best technologically based products, which must put EU companies in difficulty.