The arguments as to the inequity of unpaid internships are well rehearsed. Only the moneyed can afford to spend their holidays working for free, so only the moneyed gain the experience needed to build a CV strong enough to prevail in this weak job market. The well-off get jobs, the rich get richer, and until the economy stops sucking, the poor are left on the dole ad infinitum. Not only do they exacerbate already inexcusable financial inequality, but unpaid internships are exploitative and, lest we forget, illegal.
But there is another phenomenon brewing on this fire, slower burning but equally chilling, in the way that unpaid internships in the media may come to shape our political map.
Newspapers, magazines, television and radio are probably second only to the arts sector in their blatant, repeated abuse of young people in this way. One friend has been offered a six month internship in New York at a renowned international publication - unpaid. Another is spending a month writing copy at a newspaper, and isn't getting travel expenses. Many others not only receive nothing, but learn nothing, spending their hours, often over many months, tidying fashion cupboards, answering phones, making sure the photocopiers haven't run out of paper. Media internships take 'making the tea' to the next level.
And the people who can afford such protracted spells without pay? The rich. And so, after six to 12 months of said gratuitous hard graft, they are the ones who finally get offered a junior position. Or they take Route B and shell out £9,000 for a post-graduate journalism course and are generally employed at the end of it. Either way, jobs in the media go to the well-to-do. But the worst is not over, because then, they start to write. Or edit, or produce or present. Yes, the future of our media is in the hands of those whom, at the age of 21, have - factoring in living expenses - around 15 grand to blow.
They will be writing our newspapers, dictating our TV schedules, picking the guests on Women's Hour. People who have never encountered the dole, council housing, or been affected by rising food prices will be at the helm of by far the most powerful political lobbyists in the UK: the media.
Even as one of those privileged few, I believe that this shift will diminish the ability of the media to uphold some of its key aims. How can authority be held to account, when, like it or not, all of those writing are essentially members of the establishment? Or its work represent the views of society, when members of the fold only come from its upper echelons? Unpaid internships are not just abuse of young people, everyone will suffer.
Follow Anna Sheinman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/whatannalearned
Tanya de Grunwald: Why is Boris Johnson Using Unpaid Interns?
Jobs Few, Grads Flock to Unpaid Internships - The New York Times
The Uses and Misuses of Unpaid Internships - NYTimes.com
The Beginning of the End of Unpaid Internships - Money - Time ...
Business - Derek Thompson - Unpaid Internships: Bad for Students ...
Welcome to the Unpaid Interns Lawsuits Website
Do unpaid internships make sense for students?
The Secret Life of an Intern: The Truth Behind Unpaid Internships
Old Vic forced to suspend unpaid intern programme
I Don't Know Whether I Love Or Hate The Fashion Intern Suing Everyone
Having worked in many newsrooms and magazine offices I've seen too many people who lack competence in their job and it shocks me how poorly they perform. They've clearly not got there by hard work. They've got there by having the money to stick around and the people to put them in place.
I'm also lucky because I've met some great editors who take the time to get to know their interns and recognise talent, and go out of their way to promote it, while being considerate to their 'normal' job.
I can't help but feel a little suspicious of any wannabe journo who doesn't have some way of paying bills while working as an intern. Where's your motivation to succeed and better yourself? In a meritocracy those people would quickly find themselves unemployed.
I'm not saying that those who cannot afford to work for free are better journalists...but how can you say you've got the best if you've not given everyone an equal opportunity to prove themselves?
Ultimately it has to be editors and companies that take pride in their staff that change this...the people at the top have to want the best person for the job, rather than the easiest. Being rich doesn't make you a good writer, any more than being poor does.
So says me and my student loans.
I worked in an unpaid internship where I was given real work and learnt a huge amount over my summer. I worked hard alongside my studies, saved up enough money to be able to live over summer and therefore that gave me the opportunity to work. I'm 21 and I'd like to know when I'm getting my £15k to 'blow'?
The simple fact is that anyone can get to this sort of situation with a bit of hard work. I self-taught myself a lot of skills, started working at 13, got work experience when I was still supported by my parents (under the age of 17) and worked two jobs throughout my studies to make sure I had enough work experience and money in the bank.
The privileged can buy their way into internships, but the rich can always buy their way into anything. If you want to be truly successful off your own back it only takes hard work and determination. Each time you put in a little effort here or there it's another step on the ladder towards getting paid work or bypassing working in internships to get anywhere in life.
And let's not fall into the trap of thinking that all Oxbridge students are privileged, now...
We've only just begun to see the shift in culture and consumer to internet based media. The Huffington Post has not been around for long, especially the UK edition. We're going to see these online groups evolve into something new and untested; and I personally find this to be an exciting time!
Not only does the internet allow us all to receive information instantly, and communicate directly, we can also contribute and help to moderate and build communities! I personally believe that the impersonal and neutral nature of the internet, makes this all the more exciting. There are no borders, only social faux pas and egotism, for which you get shunned! You choose your handle, your personal appearance, how you present yourself through your writing and also where you spend your time from thousands of websites. Anyone from any background can be a part of something online.
Just beware of the current media war against Twitter. Ulterior motive much?
This means that there is some scope for the voices of the unprivileged to be heard, and the voices of the privileged to be challenged.
I would suggest that the impact of the casual blogger is vastly overestimated.
But you are also overlooking the viral effect of thread comments, or blogs, - you don't have to read them, just hear someone repeating the argument. So it's not the 'casual blogger' (nice attempt at misrepresentation) is the mass of those who comment that weakens the overall media power - allbeit slightly. Certainly we are a long way from "Public Opinion Taylor made to order" (Mr Smith Goes to Washington).
First: Of course one is forced to do unpaid internships, it's what you've got to do to get a job.
Second: Equally, while I don't have to blog *for free* (surely most blogging is unpaid?), it's what I do, partially for love, and partially to boost my CV to make myself employable.
Third: Taking legal action against a firm is costly, time consuming, and time and money are something unpaid interns lack. Legal action will also most likely hugely damage the young person's ability to find a job in the sector.