Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Anne Marie Waters

GET UPDATES FROM Anne Marie Waters
 

Opposing Sharia Law Is a Defence of the Rights of Muslims

Posted: 20/11/2012 00:00

How can we be a multicultural society if we do not accommodate sharia law? That is one of the most common questions I am asked when travelling the UK as spokesperson of the anti-sharia 'One Law for All' campaign (www.onelawforall.org.uk). It accompanies 'why are you picking on a vulnerable minority?' and cries of 'Islamophobe' and even 'racist'.

This is not unreasonable; it is right that people stand up and say so if they think a minority is being picked on, it is right that racism be held in check, and it is right that we accommodate people's beliefs provided they do not impede on the rights of others - the problem is, none of this applies here, because the sharia law I'm talking about is itself is racist and imperialist, it severely compromises human rights, and it is sharia that helps make life miserable for minorities in Britain (particularly female ones).

So, how can we be multicultural if we do not accommodate sharia? The first point to make is that sharia law does not tolerate multiculturalism. It does not tolerate dissent or difference or individual rights. Take for example Saudi Arabia, a country with a declared sharia-based constitution, and a country where apostasy, blasphemy, and 'witchcraft' carry the death penalty. Under Pakistan's sharia laws the same applies - death for blasphemy. It is widespread across the sharia-controlled world; as is the brutal treatment of women.

Due to colonial guilt, we in Europe are loath to 'tell other people what to do' so we stay away from making judgments on the practices of cultures and religions we deem alien to ourselves. But what if those practices are against the law? What if they are violent, misogynistic, homophobic and brutal? This is leaves us in an uncomfortable place. As a society, we reject violence and misogyny and homophobia, but we also reject racism and imperialism and on these matters, we are convinced that we have met with a clash and we must now choose between rejecting misogynist violence or rejecting racism. This is not the choice of course; the opposite is true.

By opposing sharia law, we are standing up for the right of Muslim women and girls not to be pressured, pushed or coerced in to attending a sharia council or tribunal where their rights will be severely undermined. In sharia councils in Britain, a woman's testimony is worth half of a man's. In practice, this means she must produce a witness for anything she alleges or the man she opposes will automatically be believed. Domestic violence is the right of husbands and marital rape is 'impossible.' Women have no right to divorce or child custody, and children live with their fathers from a preset age regardless of the consequences. This is happening while we watch. If this is what multiculturalism means, then we should reject it - we should insist that all women receive the same protection from violence, and all children. Instead, sharia is growing and is even hearing criminal cases, including at least one stabbing. It was revealed recently that little girls - some as young as five - are being 'married' in sharia bodies in Britain. This should cause a national outcry.

This is not a matter of accommodating differing cultures; it is a matter of tolerating violence and rape.

On the cries of 'Islamophobe' and 'racist' I have this to say. Islamists - those who wish to impose sharia law upon British Muslims - have deliberately hijacked these words and created a situation where criticising violent and brutal misogyny is now equated with despicable racism. The truth is that the real racism lies in our refusal to get involved. To watch while a woman we deem 'different' has her rights removed and is treated as not more than a slave.

The real racism is in believing that certain men cannot be expected to behave with respect towards women - the underlying and deeply racist implication being 'they're not as civilised as us'.

The real racism is in justifying violence and believing that women and girls within minority communities don't mind being beaten and abused, or having their genitals butchered, or being forced to marry a stranger and serve him for life.

We must reject this vile treatment of women and girls in Britain. We must do so by standing up against all misogyny - no matter its source. This is not about picking on Muslims, but standing in solidarity with them. Millions of Muslims the world over live in fear of sharia law. Many are standing up and fighting for human rights. If we truly believe in those rights - if we believe in a common humanity - we must stand up and fight with them.

 

Follow Anne Marie Waters on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AMDWaters

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
How can we be a multicultural society if we do not accommodate sharia law? That is one of the most common questions I am asked when travelling the UK as spokesperson of the anti-sharia 'One Law for Al...
How can we be a multicultural society if we do not accommodate sharia law? That is one of the most common questions I am asked when travelling the UK as spokesperson of the anti-sharia 'One Law for Al...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 295
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
10:49 PM on 11/24/2012
Wonder how many people die each year because of religion? If it was classified as a disease scientists would have found a cure and saved the world.Humans are strange cattle.
04:01 PM on 11/21/2012
Sad you have to work so hard to get nice liberals' heads on straight. Thanks for trying, though.
08:08 AM on 11/21/2012
It seems to me like the problem is that the U.K. lacks a coherent legal system. The fact that, up until now, random members of a mosque could just get together and make life-altering rulings regarding legal matters and the British government was just like, "hm, I guess this checks out, carry on then" rises to the level of Monty Python absurdity. If I handed down a ruling that my cousin had to get engaged to a kangaroo, would he need to appeal to the supreme court to annul the marriage?
04:04 AM on 11/23/2012
What do you mean UK "lacks coherent legal system?" The English legal system is the best in the world.
06:19 AM on 12/09/2012
From a theoretical standpoint English common law is the best system.  However, the actual implementation of the system over the last 20 years or so has been horrible.  This seems to be due to the fact that certain rights/structures are not enshrined were never enshrined by law, so you have the sort of break down of coherence including, but no limited to letting random religious groups act as courts of law.
06:42 AM on 11/21/2012
Wholeheartedly agree with this article. 100 years ago, woman were fighting for the right to vote in this country, then for the right to divorce, the right to property - so many things. It took them years, and they won. Thats part of our political and cultural heritage and we must never forget it. Anything that reduces, or tries to tale away these hard won freedoms must be resisted
photo
novelist2000
veritas non olet
12:05 AM on 11/21/2012
Why is sharia called 'law'? It is not a law because the definition of law is that it can be changed by majority consensus, i.e. adapted to changed circumstances. Sharia is a set of rules like edicts. Nobody has any influence on sharia and that is why we reject it. When will people stop putting the wrong label on sharia.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:55 PM on 11/20/2012
Britain should adopt ancient Irish Brehon laws too. They were somewhat more compassionate and we can remove the few bits that weren't just to update it.
Sharia can never be updated, only distorted to fit.
04:17 PM on 11/25/2012
Why would we want to adopt any one elses laws we have OUR OWN.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:40 PM on 11/25/2012
exactly. I think law is made by people for their own use. Anyone who says otherwise is quite frankly wrong and should be told so.
10:01 PM on 11/20/2012
If people want to live under sharia law then they should live in a muslim country , I am sick and tired of apologising for being british , for having the laws of my country ignored , for being told I'm racist if I dare complain about minority groups , we didnt ask you to come and live here it was your choice , so you abide by our laws , be respectful to our religious views and be grateful that you live in a country that has freedom of speech and if you cant do that then please feel free to leave .
09:35 PM on 11/20/2012
Ban Islamists like Mehdi Hasan from holding positions at Huffington Post. How can he work with non muslim people he regards as animals as he said in a lecture which can be seen on youtube?
12:28 AM on 11/21/2012
they should be banned from all prominent positions, then there would be much less of the blight of political correctness in places like the BBC who are actually now re-writing history to make it seem that ancient Britain was multicultural
09:01 PM on 11/20/2012
Cogent, well written argument, give that woman a rose.
08:17 PM on 11/20/2012
Defend the rights of women, ban the Islamic faith.
08:14 PM on 11/20/2012
Dear Ms. Waters,

Please know that in my mind, i'm standing up and cheering this article.
07:59 PM on 11/20/2012
DEFEND RIGHTS OF hUMAN BEINGS OPPOSE SHARIA LAW
07:58 PM on 11/20/2012
And how many members of British Sharia councils will face the courts for rascism and pediophilia ..not one I bet.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:57 PM on 11/20/2012
In the dark ages we had a legal system partly built on a religious premise. The idea of trial by ordeal was deeply rooted and the belief was that god woul;d protect the innocent from their ordeal which could have involved carrying a red hot piece of metal or prolonged immersion in water.
Thankfully we have moved away from that idea and now have a legal system in which everyone is equal before it. Any movement back towards a religiously based system will be a massive step backwards and (even though it may have me branded as a racist) we should not be accepting any adaptation or accomodation from a minority group. Our system has worked well for centuries, it is not broken so therefore does not need to be fixed.
07:44 PM on 11/20/2012
Sorry, was I asleep????? Thought as we are in Britain we could have British law - or maybe I'm just racist????
08:25 PM on 11/20/2012
So true! Fanned and faved.
photo
hearthammer
If left is right and right is wrong, decide!
09:25 AM on 11/23/2012
Unfortunately, there is no such animal as "British law."

I agree with what you're trying to say, however.