Is 2012 the year that racism makes its name? It's hard to ignore the fact that sports headlines have been less focused on, well, actual sport than the prejudicial antics of a few well known players. Whatever our opinions of John Terry and Luis Suarez, it seems that racism is not dead. The sad fact is that many school teachers could have told you this a long time ago.
In every school I've worked in, I have been startled and disappointed by the racial segregation that occurs on a daily basis in our canteens and playgrounds. I'm not even talking about what David Levin, the vice-chair of the Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference commented on last year when he stated that society was "sleepwalking towards Johannesburg" as schools became monocultural institutions serving small and distinct communities. Even in schools that cannot be designated as being populated by one particular racial group, the keen observer of teenagers will notice that they group together in factions of single cultures. The Asian students will befriend the Asian students, the Turkish will remain with the Turkish, the White with the White and the Black with the Black.
This need for grouping along cultural or racial lines is not new either. I remember attending a state comprehensive in Leicester and I am ashamed to admit that even though there were students from different backgrounds (very few, as it served a predominantly Asian area and therefore was made up of mostly Asian students), it did not occur to me to mix with those who were different to me. That happened later. Not at my sixth form college, mind you. I still tell colleagues and friends of the mini-apartheid that existed at this institution. In class, we mixed; in the canteen, one side was white, the other side brown and ne'er the twain did meet. It was only at university that I discovered friends from different backgrounds and started to consider what integration and what cultural inter-mixing really meant.
While there have been very few incidents of open racism in the schools I have worked in, I cannot help but wonder what this means for a society that is again starting to realise that race and class are as divisive as they have always been. This week, a fascinating TV documentary, Making Bradford British, will deal with the uncomfortable truth of our segregation. Like in our schools, Bradford is a city that contains lots of different ethnic groups who, on the surface, accept each others' presence, but make no effort to understand each other. Our canteens are the starting line for this kind of social division. It begins in teenage years and it extends throughout lives.
There is a distinct difference between physical proximity to other cultures and actually understanding them. What is it that we need to do in schools to ensure that children grow up with an acute understanding of someone else's religion, culture, race, background? The simple answer to this is to make Religious Education a fundamental, almost sacrosanct, part of the curriculum. I believe that this subject goes part of the way in addressing lack of basic knowledge about religion, but it does not necessarily deal with race and culture. Learning about the 5Ks of Sikhism does not mean that people from different cultures truly understand each other.
The Guardian article on Making Bradford British cites a publican called Audrey. Her statement - "I have lived in Bradford for more than 30 years and I have never been invited by an Asian to have Sunday lunch or a cup of tea," - is hideously revealing.
Firstly because Sunday lunch or cups of tea are culturally specific to her and secondly because she inadvertently identifies the problem. Our students are educated together, in seating plans that mean that they sit next to and work with other students from different cultures, but they don't go round for dinner, or attend weddings together, or celebrate religious festivals together. Many students' cultural experience is made up a thin veneer of multiculturalism - easily peeled away when they no longer even have to sit next to that person because their life choices mean that they've segregated for good.
Is it too uncomfortable to point out to our students that this is the case? Do we allow them to divide along racial lines because that is our own experience - the way it has always been and the way it will continue to be for generations to come? It would take a brave soul to begin, in an educational context, to tackle what most are too afraid to admit. Racism, for most of us, is something that footballers experience - it is Stephen Lawrence eighteen years ago, it is pictures from South Africa, or the American Deep South. We don't look at our playgrounds closely enough, because then we might see that racial misunderstanding and the perpetual mystery that surrounds 'other' cultures begins very early.
Follow Bansi Kara on Twitter: www.twitter.com/benniekara
Marc Hawker: Proud and Prejudiced: The Jihadist and the Hooligan
Gary Andrews: Debate About Racism in Football Isn't Helped by John Terry and Luis Suarez Cases
Michelle Holmes: The Miseducation of Britain
Make Bradford British: Channel 4's shocking new TV show | Mail ...
Bradford and race: the TV experiment that aims to change ...
Make Bradford British - Features - Channel 4 Citizenship Test ...
Make Bradford British - Series 1 - Episode 1 - Make Bradford British ...
When they arrive on the first day of the course, the Asian students quickly form friendships with each other and, in contrast with their white counterparts who focus on developing friendships with other students in their year, they set about making contact with students in the year above them. (An important lesson for any lecturer is never set the same essay two years in a row!)
Another barrier to integration relates to subjects of conversation. For example, the Asian students have little interest in fashion, pop music, make up or members of the opposite sex. Even though the majority were born this country and attended British schools, English is their second language and this, again, is a barrier to integration. The most visible barrier is the relative immaturity of the Asian students. In class, they giggle, pass notes to each other etc., to the irritation of their more mature which counterparts.
So a golden opportunity to mix with and come to understand people from other cultures and improve their own understanding of their country of birth is wasted.
I found them to be very polite, no note-passing, but some giggling. Mind you, at this point I was at the sort of school where you stood up to answer questions, worked in silence and the entire class stood up for "Good Morning/Afternoon Sir/Ma'am" at the start, so there wasn't as much of that sort of thing in general. They did tend to be more "girlish" though. That didn't bother me. Giggling in class didn't either, but that's because I was normally in trouble myself for whatever form of "not paying attention" I was up to. (There were poor imitations of Keats in my math exercise book)
As school progressed, and I moved areas and schools, there were new divisions. Being old enough to travel alone and earn money partly erased the geographical boundaries. The new groups were based around interests - fashion/celebrity types, horsey girls, subcultural types, Anime geeks, hockey/lacrosse girls, girls into hip hop and big gold earrings, the girls who practically lived in the library (inc. me) choir/orchestra girls, etc. Some groups got quite cliquish - think "Mean Girls". When at college, similar groups existed.
I went to establishments which were very multicultural, and while the Chinese girls did socialise with other Chinese girls, and the Muslim girls socialise with other Muslims, etc. they did not do so exclusively, and the interest based groups held more sway. My friendships came from backgrounds as diverse as the schools I attended. We got on and shared interests, and so became friends.
Secondly, it was not only those who were academic or had "high culture" interests that mingled across ethnic divides. I will say that by this point I was at a private boarding school on scholarship, but even when I was at a state school, I think people still congregated more on the basis of interests. That said, I think some interests while not culture-specific, do have close ties to certain cultures - you're more likely to find an American or Japanese baseball fan than a Brit. There's also stereotypes, and sometimes the pressure from within the community to uphold them as well as the negative pressure from outside.
I will also say that this was a while ago; maybe since then divisions have become more entrenched? I found that the sports societies and music societies tended to be the most multicultural - a common passion bonds people, with me it was a common passion for books, for others it is football or a specific genre of music.
Thirdly, I'm talkative on the internet, but shy in person. I've enough trouble making friends as it is without adding extra barriers such as ethnicity in my own path.
It is not about racism, it is about cultural segregation.
The original article was from newsweek.
The secondary school in London the would have gone to has metal detectors and burly security guards at the entrance. They would have been a racial minority among a lawless, violent, English hating majority.imo.
Moving to a more civilized part of the country for the sake of my kids welfare. Sensible parenting in my opinion.
I was perhaps fortunate, at least in terms of minimising the difficulties that are faced by not being able to integrate, that my parents decided deliberately not to live in places where "their sort" congregated but rather just to get on in broader society. So we did go round each others for meals, to play, to have cups of tea and so on. The flip side of that though was the fact that from school age on there was little call to retain the use of the Bengali that nobody else around spoke.
Hearthammer and Macfarlane are right.
The majority come and try to change our society into theirs or deliberately segregate themselves from us in their behaviour/ benefit fraud:- documented recently £ 80,000 taken, £19.00 returned
The last Muslim chap I worked with told me how his friends liked nothing better at the weekend than to drive over Christian graves for the fun of it.
How as a child can i converse with other nations people who have little or no interest in what I am interested in like say football, I remember a chap at school who said he did not use toilet paper because it was against his beliefs, that endeared him to us all so much.
Black people seem to integrate much better, look at the Premier league, the pub, sports, working for a living. On the other hand their are many intelligent Asian people who excel in healthcare etc.
I dont think you can change human nature/evolution, improve it yes, but birds of a feather will always flock together, if they fly happy then great if not we all have a problem.
This is an observation.
The reason that schools become overwhelmngly Asian, African etc. is becasue immigrants all graduate to the same places. They then breed and the schools have to address the problem of the children, some of whom can't even speak English by the time they're five!
So, assuming we're not going to say, "you cannot live there!", what do we do? Do we bus kids around the cities in a useless atempt at tacial standardisation? And what about religious schools?
Just remember that ghettos are not built. They're created by people!
If I enter a room of strangers my natural inclination is to gravitate to the group that appear to most resemble me. Depending upon circumstances, my choice would take into account age, gender, language and clothing, race would be of no concern. I will admit that if I cannot find a "natural" match, then stereotypes do come into play, a group of Sikhs will always beat a group of black suits-tieless white shirts-black hats. I may later amend my choice but you have to start somewhere.
.
I suppose that's what the Northern Irish have been saying for centuries now. "We want more religion", they've been saying, "who cares about our sectarian violence when we have religion to bring our communities together?"
The point was meant to suggest that, from my point of view, as an outsider to both camps, Sikh turbans, have an approach to life that bears more comparison with mine, The various "black hat" groups appear to have a more intense and introspective approach and to prefer disciplines that I would find difficulty accommodating.
No private education before University level.
No religious education
No gender separation.
No separation on colour of skin.
No diverse dress code, only state uniforms, which must apply to ALL educational establishments.
No cultural or ethnic divergence from OUR British way.
If any of the above are demanded, then those who demand can leave the UK for places where such intolerances are the norm.
Children are not "natural" bigots, or racists. These attitudes are taught, either directly in the home or by the process of separation and making a distinction between "us" and "them".
Stop the separation. Teach our children together. Keep belief in the home and in the place of worship and perhaps this country may be a better place in the long run.
BUT I guess the question is, how wrong is it for children to segregate like this - children will always form groups; I would be willing to bet that if Bansi Kara looked closer she would see that even within the cultural groups that there are other groups: sporty types and geeks; boys and girls; chess club and science club.
So long as everyone respects each other there is no harm
My argument is that small white kids don't know that they are "catholic" or "protestant" until somebody TELLS them and forces a separation on them.
You are always going to find divisions in a group as you point out. Jocks and Geeks etc. But these are division to a certain degree of Choice, not of Force.
If you build a wall, the chances are that you will never talk to your neighbour. Start by Not having a wall in the first place.