Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bansi Kara

GET UPDATES FROM Bansi Kara
 

Teacher Strikes: Is There a New Form of Protest?

Posted: 29/03/2012 00:00

I have to admit ambivalence about yesterday's NUT strike in London. I went to work, not because I disagree with the concept of fighting for my pension, but for the rather more prosaic reason that I belong to another union, who did not choose to strike this time.

Where does this ambivalence come from? From weariness, perhaps. From sheer, dogged tiredness at fighting something that seems so unfair. From the fear that no matter how many times we teachers go on strike, it does not and will not change the relentless march towards 'reform' touted by our government and those they have appointed.

This is 'reform' that seems not to care whether I am there at the end of this journey. The house must be cleaned, the bath water thrown out and the baby with it. In fact, 'reform' is so high on the agenda, I am all 'reformed' out: my teaching has been thoroughly scrubbed and investigated, my progress over time is hanging out on the washing line and my pension has been turned inside out and given a good whacking with the dust beater.

I should be feeling squeaky clean, but actually, I feel... quite wiped out. It is now, at the age of 31, that I have come to realise that protest is exhausting.

How long have I been protesting? I can tell you I was there on the NUS march in Central London over ten years ago, standing under the University of Warwick banner, protesting against tuition fees.

I shouted as loudly as them all: "What are fees? Cheeky! How cheeky? Very!" My academic year was the first to pay them. I did pay them and accrued a considerable amount of debt - most of which I am still paying.

I was there at the NUS march against top-up fees, to prevent a generation of students being in a worse position than I was. Top-up fees were introduced and duly increased to what for some families might be astronomically inaccessible levels.

My insides have protested against other aspects of education for the ten years I have been teaching - most recently against Boris Johnson's assertion that the riots last summer were caused by poor schools who did not do enough to raise levels of literacy.

In the same ridiculous public ramble, he stated that "there are some boroughs like Hackney that are very good at tackling this problem in schools" and that there are some schools that are "chillingly bad". Boris, my inner placard read, Hackney was at the centre of the riots even though most schools in the borough have outstanding results - and ironically, the other borough where there was a distinct problem was Enfield, the site of two mayoral academies.

Maybe my inner placard wasn't loud enough to be heard.

I'm not the only one tired of protesting. The news today barely covers the strikes in London - shortage of fuel is more alarming than teachers walking out of their classrooms and withholding their labour. The story doesn't make it onto the headlines on the BBC News website. Squint and you might see it in the education section, no bigger than the story about the anti-insect wheat trials being underway.

Does that mean I have given up, moved beyond caring? No, definitely not. When Nick Gibb says: "This deal is as good as it gets and takes the right balance - guaranteeing teachers one of the best pensions available, but keeping a lid on rising costs for the taxpayer", I have to laugh because if I don't, I might cry instead.

I am not just a teacher, I am the taxpayer. My costs have risen every year, but my cost of living allowance has been frozen for the last two years. My taxes pay for nuclear defence programmes when I'd much rather they paid for teachers' pensions. In attempting to balance the books in this way, the government has failed to see one major flaw in the plan: the economy may be saved, but the damage to the collective consciousness of the teaching workforce may be irreparable.

My protest today took entirely a different form. I did not form a picket line, or hold a placard because from my own bitter experience, I can see that has not worked to change educational issues.

I decided that the best form of protest was going into work and doing my job to the best of my ability so that Sir Michael Wilshaw can't say that I am not doing it properly. I helped Year 11 students become more literate so that Boris Johnson can't tell me that it was my fault that London burned and so that my students could go on to live productive lives.

I supported my colleagues by creating and sharing resources so that I could model to those in government what collegiality means in education. I arranged mentor observations so that I could help young teachers become good at their jobs and so that they could alter futures, change society and address educational disadvantage. I did what Mahatma Gandhi said I should do: "Be the change that you want to see in the world." I wasn't on the streets, but my soul was there, chanting: "What are pension changes? Cheeky! How cheeky? Very!"

 

Follow Bansi Kara on Twitter: www.twitter.com/benniekara

FOLLOW UK STUDENTS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:46 AM on 03/29/2012
There is absolutely no point in striking about pensions, pay or anything else to do with money at the moment. There is no moral high ground left to claim - only other people to blame and a bunch of smug tossers with tax breaks and trust funds.

As for teachers striking in general: if the unions had the balls to take on the government about working conditions, the relentless cascade of stupid initiatives, the constant change and reform, and the moronic statements from Ministers who want every child to be "above average" - well, then that would be a strike worth supporting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laatab
All The Worlds A Stage
07:47 AM on 03/29/2012
It is exhausting I know. There are a lot of protests going on that dont any attention from the mainsteam media. Thats what they do, ignore you, and in doing so disempower you. they have made socialism a dirty word and union activity the enemy in the minds of many. It's a mess!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ccraiglamont
Sometimes funny, other times...not!
06:11 AM on 03/29/2012
Okay, so give me a ball park figure.... how much is your salary? (a) £20-30,000, (b) £30-50,000, (c) £50-75,000, or (d) £75,000+ ? Don't be shy, the figure is the top line of your p60 from last year. I am a parent who works for not much more than the minimum wage in the private sector, who cannot afford a pension and has to take days without pay to cover strikes, and never gets to holiday as a family with both my wife (also part-time and on minimum wage) and son as we have to take alternate weeks of holidays to cover the 12 weeks+ of School holidays per year. Then come back to me with "How hard done by you are!"
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Joseph Stashko
09:34 AM on 03/29/2012
Haha.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Bansi Kara
04:03 PM on 03/29/2012
I'm surprised at how angry you seen to be at people who, if you look at it the other way around, teach your children for 39 weeks of the year. If the teaching profession is constantly subjected to change, it seems unlikely that it will attract quality candidates. This would in turn affect the quality of your children's education.

I'm not sure it is a helpful argument to compare salaries and use that as an argument against people going on strike. Discontent is always relative, but that doesn't mean it is not felt, or real.

I think people should take action when they are unhappy in a reasonable way. Your discontent with the teachers salaries and holidays must mean you feel uncomfortable placing your children in our hands got the majority of the day, for the majority of the year. Perhaps homeschooling might be a way forward?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ccraiglamont
Sometimes funny, other times...not!
04:27 PM on 03/29/2012
For an educated person, I am VERY surprised that you missed my point entirely, which is that, teachers as a whole are NOT poorly paid and their pensions ARE better than most people working in the private sector. You seem coy about answering a,b,c or d Is it because you really think it is unhelpful or because when you look at the cold hard facts you aren't actually too badly off and it isn't unreasonable for you to be asked to tighten your belts like others within the private sector?
As for having my child in school for the majority of the day? I hardly think that 9am until 3pm with an hour lunchtime constitutes the majority of the day. My wife and I spend a lot more time with our son helping him brush up on his reading, writing and numeracy skills, whilst also helping him achieve other more basic life skills. Perhaps if teachers are so unhappy they should find a job in a supermarket or a burger chain working on their feet all day, most weekends and bank holidays without any payment premium on the minimum wage? Because THAT is the flip side of the coin!