Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Brett Wigdortz

GET UPDATES FROM Brett Wigdortz
 

GCSE Results Will Expose a Divide in British Society

Posted: 25/08/11 01:00 BST

It would be hard not to notice that GCSE results were released this morning, and the headlines could probably have been written weeks in advance - lots of As and A*s; a general upwards trend in grades; thousands of children jumping for joy and celebrating as they receive their exam results - exams which will help determine the future course of their lives.

There will be many great achievements to be showcased, but yet why do many of us working in education continue to be concerned? Because these results will also continue to show the perpetuation of a depressing trend - that the link between low family income and poor educational attainment is greater here than in almost any other developed country.

Last year 31% of pupils on Free School Meals (which are claimed by pupils from the lowest income families) attained five A* to C grades at GCSE including English and Maths, nearly half the percentage of those grades achieved by pupils from wealthier families. Over the past five years, the gap in this measure between FSM eligible pupils and non-FSM eligible pupils has narrowed only slightly from 28.1% points to 27.6% points. In other words, you could virtually predict what GCSE results a child will end up getting by seeing their parent's pay slips when they are four years old. On average, their subsequent 12 years of education do little to change their trajectory. We know there are socio-economic gaps in early year development, which only seem to widen throughout formal schooling.

The effects of this gap are persistent and have consequences for individuals as well as society. We know that education levels can be directly linked to a person's happiness, earning power and even health and longevity. This situation cannot possibly lead to a fair Britain.

This status quo is unjust and untenable but, crucially, it can also be changed. We only have to look at other countries and regions that have managed to move towards this goal - Ontario, Singapore and Finland are three geographically diverse places that have little in common except for this success. Similarly many British schools have shown this can be done domestically - Mossbourne Academy, St Saviour's and St Olave's in London and Park View School in Birmingham, achieve GCSE results way beyond what has historically been achieved in low income areas even though most of their pupils come from the lowest income quintile. If this is being done for some children, how unfortunate is it that their peers don't share in this benefit?

Nine years of leading Teach First have shown me the secret to scrapping this gap isn't much of a secret at all. What we need are visionary headteachers with a clear ethos and strong aspirations for the pupils under their care, leading committed teachers and other staff who support the pupils to set and achieve stretching goals. This must be done in partnership with families and other community influencers.

It is not easy to achieve, but then important things rarely are. What could be more important than ensuring in an August not too long from now, teenagers in every neighbourhood in the country can celebrate with equal vigour their results that will open doors to the next stage of their lives.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:49 PM on 08/25/2011
It is known that "middle class" school starters are around 2 years ahead of children of the lowest income families. I has been found that the children of middle class parents are even more years ahead than lowest income children by the the time they are 11 regardless of whether both sets are at a good school or bad. Marked differences are apparent by age three. This suggests that there are far greater differences in how pre-school children are treated by parents in the UK than in some other countries. It also suggests that school is too late and that to bring on disadvantaged children requires action well before they are three years old. Middle class parents tend to talk more with their children using a bigger vocabulary read to them and instill discipline at an early age. They may be at work in the day but still find time to "teach" their children. It would be quite difficult to achieve this level of integration by some form of preschool teaching for lower income children as it requires spending much time with each child as an individual which would be expensive.
01:37 PM on 08/25/2011
Moving to a new school in a deprived area of a town in the south has shown me exactly what can be achieved with high aspirations, as well as pace and challenge in lessons.

There is however a divide, and unless we start to recognise 'skills' as well as academic qualifications this will always be the case.

The current goverment clearly do not value vocational qualifications which can act as a net to draw in those that struggle with the traditional subjects.

I don't have the solution - but we need one!
10:25 AM on 08/25/2011
We shouldn't pretend that we can do much about the great unwashed and their lack of ambition and achievement. The poor will always be with us and there are many people in politics and the teaching and "caring" professions with a vested interest in keeping it that way. The great fallacy in this article is that standards continue to improve, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary. Employers find that a string of As and A*s does not mean that a potential employee can read, write, or understand basic arithmetic. The possession of a degree in one of the vast number of soft subjects merely serves to confirm that the graduate is intellectually limited - what is the value of a degree in Football Studies from the University of Luton? Sadly, it's really too late do much about it; the lunatics are running the asylum.
08:22 AM on 08/25/2011
"What we need are visionary headteachers with a clear ethos and strong aspirations for the pupils under their care, leading committed teachers and other staff who support the pupils to set and achieve stretching goals"

You may need to ave a long talk with the teachers unions about that one. Don't like your chances of getting much beyond lip-service agreement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
05:22 AM on 08/25/2011
I would be interested to see whether there is a strong difference in the results depending on the cultural backgrounds of parents. Amongst the "poors", would the populations from indians and chinese origins get better results than population from other cultural origins (including white)?
This is just an assumption. Depending on the response to this question you could also infer a lot of things on the impact of parents impact on their children's life.
08:58 AM on 08/25/2011
Hi

Underlying trends are often missed by stopping and reacting to the gross interpretation of the data -- FSM pupils do perform less well on average than non FSM pupils - but this does not answer the "WHY" question, nor does it explore (as you point out) any deeper implications, such as cultural influences.

I blogged at http://glengilchrist.co.uk/?p=768 about the annual "data-fest" that is results season, and the difficulties in using blunt instruments to analyse data.

Sure there is an FSM differential, but I bet there is a more important underlying trend, such as those on FSM where both parents don't actually work --- the implication being it is the dual lack of employment, not the FSM status that matters.

Glen Gilchrist