Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Caroline Frost

GET UPDATES FROM Caroline Frost
 

Does 'Call The Midwife' Fail The Sexism Test... For Men?

Posted: 05/02/2013 23:00

Call the Midwife is perfect Sunday evening telly fare - with its nostalgic look at poverty-stricken East London, the hardships and deprivations of the 1950s soothed by the tender administrations of the clear-skinned midwives and their elders, stroking the cheeks of young to old, smiling with good-humoured compassion and easing the passage of world entry while they're about it.

But, this dewey tableau has been pilloried this season around for giving men a hard time... when they're not serially bashing their wives, they're neglecting them in fire hazards of homes, marrying two sisters at a time (that was all a bit weird) or queueing up on the ship to take their turn with the captain's daughter.

A useful test to see if any TV show passes muster for female equality is to ask three simple questions... is there more than one female lead character? Do they appear in scenes on their own without men as well? Do they talk about more than just boys and makeup, so we see them as identities away from the prism of the male-dominant social paradigm? (This is the Bechdel Test - read more on it here... ) You'd be amazed how many shows we praise for their apparently equality answer 'No' to these questions. But what if we turn them around, too, to see how the men are being treated? Here goes... for the women first:

Is there more than one lead female character?
They're everywhere, from senior nuns, to young midwives, not forgetting missionary-in-waiting Chummy. In addition, we have the weekly guests, the pregnant ladies needing our heroines' help and, most recently, Matron at Jenny's new hospital.

Do women appear in scenes by themselves without men?
Yes, often. They don't always get on... witness last night's encounter between Jenny and her new Matron. There are actually very few scenes with men at all.

Do the women talk about subjects other than men, or their relationships with men?
A spot check on this week's episode reveals discussions about staffing, employment expectations, serving suggestions for avocado pears, the soothing benefits of marshmallows in pregnancy, the fear of forceps, and what the Tarot cards prophecise for an easy birth. The first time last night's episode turned to 'men-talk' was Cynthia and Jenny's discussion about Jimmy - 29 minutes into an hour-long programme.

Ok, for female equality on TV, I think we can safely call this an official PASS. But how do the men fare? Here goes... for a spot-check of this week's episode with the same questions.

Is there more than one lead male character?
Doctor Turner is always around somewhere - he fills around 15 minutes of airtime per episode, there was a bunch of male hospital patients in this week's episode, and the object of Jenny's affections, Jimmy, also enjoys a fair amount of screen time. Probably about 20 minutes in all.

Do men appear in scenes by themselves without women?
A resounding no. The reliable handyman helps the new nurse with her bag. When Jimmy is attended by a male consultant in hospital, a female nurse stands by his bed throughout. Jimmy is on the phone in another scene, but Jenny is on the other end. In one of this week's most emotional scenes, the twin sisters' (shared) husband remarks of the girls' affection, "They always said they was born with a gap, they filled it for each other." Its him who gets to say the significant remark, and he's speaking to the male doctor. But it's about the girls, and the nursing sister is sitting there all the while.

Do the men talk about subjects other than women, or other than their relationships to women?
A male doctor does diagnose Jimmy in hospital, but it's a faulty diagnosis, corrected by a female nurse. Jimmy talks to Jenny about marrying Francie, and Jenny later tells Jimmy she can't see him any more. The good Doctor Turner is the lone male character who treats the nurses around him as professionals. With his exception, it's the men who are confined to sexual stereotypes here - either overbearing, or objects of desire - and the good doctor does not escape completely, as he is the object of Sister Miller's secret warmth.

So, Call the Midwife is a resounding fail for the sexism test as far as the men are concerned, then. Sure... it's about a period of time when male and female professional roles were very separately defined, and a particular profession where men scarcely featured.

However, some of the giveaways are in how Jimmy is depicted, an object of desire about whom we know very little other than his relations with specific women, as well as the recalcitrant consultant, complacent in his seniority, and faulty in his diagnosis.

I'm not really having a go at Call the Midwife in particular - it's a warm show inviting EVERYONE to be softer, more expressive, more protective, more... contemporary, in fact. And Doctor Turner alone balances a lot of the accusations with his warmth, universal compassion and respect for his fellow medicine people.

But its failing the simple test above does show how easily a lack of sexual equality on screen can occur if a scriptwriter is focusing on keeping his/HER plot moving along merrily, romantically and dramatically. Call the Midwife has seen the pendulum swing violently in the other direction from many of the big screen blockbusters where women roll up on oil rigs inexplicably bikini-clad. Surely, it's now time for it to rest calmly somewhere in the middle.

Loading Slideshow...
  • 3436041-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422730-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422743-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422756-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422769-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422782-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422795-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422808-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3430701-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3435907-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3436054-low-call-the-midwife

  • 2690944-low-call-the-midwife

  • 2789809-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3247813-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3247826-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3247839-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3247852-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3247865-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3247878-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3247891-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3247904-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3247928-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3247956-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3248133-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3248146-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3248159-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3248173-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3340682-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3372101-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422071-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422084-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422097-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422425-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422438-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422527-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422561-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422587-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422674-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422687-low-call-the-midwife

  • 3422717-low-call-the-midwife

 

Follow Caroline Frost on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Frostalicus

FOLLOW UK ENTERTAINMENT
Call the Midwife is perfect Sunday evening telly fare - with its nostalgic look at poverty-stricken East London, the hardships and deprivations of the 1950s soothed by the tender administrations of th...
Call the Midwife is perfect Sunday evening telly fare - with its nostalgic look at poverty-stricken East London, the hardships and deprivations of the 1950s soothed by the tender administrations of th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 35
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:32 PM on 03/18/2013
If you're going to produce dramas based on mathematically driven screen time by gender, topics of conversation, who the characters must appear with to be gender-neutral, portraying more modern attitudes where they don't fit with the times - it's going to be one boring mess.
gotch
..just having my say...
06:30 PM on 03/01/2013
Well, the series is after all, entitled "Call the MIDWIFE." If the series were called "Call the OB-Gyn," maybe more men would have bigger roles. Just a thought.
07:41 AM on 02/13/2013
I love call the midwife and as a Nurse who just happens to be a nurse, I find the history aspect of it amazing....now what I would really like to see is the book when a man carries a lamp about one of the first men training to be a nurse in Sheffield dramatized to see how that worked out
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ian Rennie
It irritates people that I'm a librarian :)
07:34 AM on 02/07/2013
Caroline, if you're going to rip off the Bechdel Test, at least credit Alison Bechdel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Yates
06:12 AM on 02/07/2013
What a puerile article, with a few associated comments which demonstrate how some elements in society have become unhealthily obsessed with the male/female/sexist/Chauvinist et al arguments. "Call the Midwife" is a piece of television drama based on the writings and experiences of a real person ( the memoirs of Jennifer Worth), reflecting the reality of life and attitudes of the times as they were then, and not as some quasi pc pressure groups would wish them to be now. Trying to impose 21st century values into the 1950's is a very futile exercise.
When fact and reality has to be distorted to comply with the sentiments and prejudices of today's society we may as well dispense with televised drama and watch nothing but Camberwick Green. (Although I am sure that someone somewhere will, at some time, raise the proposition that this too is sexist)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
05:41 PM on 02/06/2013
We men dont actaully care that much about tv portrayal ! Soaps are girly girly time.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:16 PM on 02/06/2013
Bit of a silly article. A show set in the 1950's about female midwives dealing with pregnant women. If you had a programme in the 1960's in a coal mine about coal miners you may have found that they were men! Or what about a programme about a WW2 infantry unit?

Come on, lets have a good article!
03:39 PM on 02/06/2013
"I'm not really having a go at Call the Midwife in particular"

Well, no, applying the reverse Bechdel test to a programme which is set in a period where professional roles were heavily genderised by society, and where the function of the programme is to portray a specific profession that was heavily genderised as female, and where the primary clients of that professional are intrinsically female, would be misapplying the reverse-Bechdel test.

The gender bias existed in the period and profession depicted. The Bechdel test is a test of gender bias in the depiction. The Bechdel test is best applied to situations where there would be women involved in normal life situations but where they are absent or under-involved in the depiction.
01:25 PM on 02/06/2013
This seems like a bit of a pointless article to me. As well as mangling the Bechdel test (the 'useful test' that is described, badly), it completely misses that point of it. The Bechdel tests exist because the majority of films and television programs feature male leads and a predominance of male characters (this is changing, slowly), therefore applying it to a female lead TV show doesn't make a lot of sense. Go ahead and apply the test to both men and women across TV dramas and films, you'll find the male one (the 'reverse Bechdel', if you will) will pass far more times than the female one.

There aren't as many male characters in this show, but it's about midwives in the 50's, what did you expect? If you want to see a TV show with more men in it, change the channel, you're sure to find one soon enough.
02:53 PM on 02/06/2013
So sexism is only a one way street!!!
03:16 PM on 02/06/2013
Of course not, sexism goes both ways. I was merely pointing out that when it comes to television, many more shows would fail the Bechdel test (for women) than would fail the 'reverse Bechdel' (for men).

It's also worth noting that the Bechdel test isn't a test for sexism, it's a test for the representation of women in fiction: you could have plenty of women in a piece of fiction and it could still be sexist (likewise, you could have plenty of men in a TV show and it could be sexist against men).

I was mainly trying to point out that a) the article makes a hash of explaining the Bechdel test and b) the show is about midwives in the 50s, it is going to be female dominated c) that's not necessarily a bad thing.

So long as there is a balance of gender representation overall, it doesn't matter if an individual show/film is biased towards a gender, the problem comes when the majority of fiction is skewed in one direction.
12:42 PM on 02/06/2013
Do we even need to ask this question?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SophiaFlorere
Moving forward into the 21st century
09:41 AM on 02/06/2013
As others have already commented, these are women's stories. Worth wrote about what she encountered in East London in the 50's. Give over---there are lots of stories set in a man's world. I love this show; it is more about the human condition than anything----stories of life and death and the narratives that have resounded throughout human history.
10:09 AM on 02/06/2013
In short it is sexist against men!
03:41 PM on 02/06/2013
Really? So, you think it falsely depicts men as less involved in midwifery and child-birth than they were at the time period the show is set in?
11:47 PM on 02/05/2013
Hi Caroline,

First some context. Call the Midwife is early into series 2. The first series featured - as well as the doctor - a trusted male handyman, a doting father of 25 children, a man who accepted his wife's illegitimate baby against social norms, a policeman whose virtue established the central romantic storyline, an elderly soldier whose tenderness helped the central female character to overcome her own prejudices....

I really could go on. Call the Midwife is a world focusing on a dominantly female experience (see title). The idea that men are somehow discriminated against for not being the benevolent centre of this world is plain wrong, and frankly ludicrous.

Also, I find your 'useful test' a rather silly measurement for sexism on TV. Counting numbers of men in scenes, and whether they speak about 'non-lady things' when they appear - is simplistic in the extreme.

Call the Midwife is based on a journal written by a woman, and set in a woman's world. The male characters - their motivations, character, speech, and frequency of their appearances - are governed not by a wicked plot to discriminate, but by the more obvious imperatives of drama structure. Men are a part of the story, not the story itself - in turn as good or as bad as any other character, male or female. Men aren’t the ‘issue’ in Call the Midwife. Because for once in TV drama, the women featured have far more important issues to attend to.
11:23 PM on 02/05/2013
sorry forgot our police, and fire brigade,bus and taxi n drivers.
10:09 AM on 02/06/2013
MAIN characters?
11:19 PM on 02/05/2013
todge!,we have male "midwives",and ambulNCE STAFF AND FATHERS AND CHILDREN AS lonng as mam and baby are ok its alright.
10:42 PM on 02/05/2013
Might as well say the Hobbit is sexist... it's just a story of its day. We watch old films set in "a man's world"- "Call the Midwife" is set in a woman's world... and due to the nature of the programme, of course there are going to be "bad" men. Pregnancy wasn't always caused by two people very much in love, and marriages were rarely hunky-dory. Of course Call the Midwife is going to show these sorts of stories... and I know a lot of ladies around and birthing in that time that find it very accurate.