Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Charlotte Skeoch

GET UPDATES FROM Charlotte Skeoch
 

The Problem With Anne Hathaway's Catwoman

Posted: 31/12/11 00:00 GMT

Any Tom Dick or Harry (but particularly Shakespeare) will tell you that the eyes are the window to the soul. The number one go-to for immediate character assassination...or love, if you're that way inclined.

Horror flick victims never shut up about "the eyes, the horrible dead eyes", though to be fair I can't even look directly at a photo of Ted Bundy's eyes without suffering mild palpitations of terror, so fair play to them really.

Lovers too - films are littered with them, lightly drooling and gazing in to each others eyes like the winning Lottery numbers might be in there. Interrogation scenes are so overloaded with eyeballing it's a wonder the entire cast of CSI aren't horrendously bonk-eyed by now.

But one thing I'm sure is lurking in there - amongst all the black stuff I got all over Mrs Elgy in GCSE biology class - is sex appeal. As The Office USA so wisely exhumed: "The eyes are the groin of the head."

One hard look into Scarlett Johanssen's big old blues, and you just KNOW she got an A* in rumpy pumpy. She exudes it. And not just through her ample bosom, which I once strongly suspected could be her only medium of sexual communication. Even as a female, I can appreciate that Jessica Alba has the kind of eyes that make you want to take her to a hotel room, not for dinner at your parent's. And Megan Fox is practically the Medusa of arousal.

However, we can't ALL be wandering around giving off sexy vibes through our smizing eyes.

Case in point: Anne Hathaway. Hathaway is unquestionably beautiful. As Mia Thermopolis in The Princess Dairies, I am not ashamed to say she was my teenage hero (luckily my filmic tastes have ripened, like a good smelly Brie). But there is no escaping the fact that she has the eyes of a naïve, cowering Bambi.

So big, so dewey, so utterly devoid of sex appeal. And this, Christopher Nolan, is my overriding problem with your crazed decision to cast Hathaway as Selina Kyle.

Yes, Nolanites, protest all you will, call up Heath Ledger as reason for blind faith in Nolan's casting abilities, but you will not win me over. I'm in no hurry to forget that he also cast Katie Holmes in Batman Begins: a woman who is not only clinically insane for marrying a tiny man who believes tiny aliens run the world, but also one of the most uncharismatic actresses to ever grace our screens. I'm in no rush to forgive and forget that kind of behaviour (although Inception went some way in salving the wounds).

The Bambi effect is not necessarily a curse. It lends just the right amount of charming fragility to Burton's Snow Queen. It makes you want to found a Parkinson's charity as soon as the credits roll on Love and Other Drugs. But it does not make you want to pour her in to bad-gal leather and pop her a-top a purring motorbike. Kiera Knightly suffers the same affliction (see The Jacket for evidence of Bambi abuse), and while Zooey Deschanel may be the stuff indie boys dreams are made of, no amount of kook, quirk and doe-eye will equate to raw, rip-my-togs-off sex appeal.

No, my mind is made up. Batman forums internet-wide can discuss it 'til they're blue in the motherboard. Hathaway may be beautiful, she may be talented, she may still have a hallowed place in my heart...but I'd rather get my claws into Pfeiffer's Catwoman any day. Meeeeeeow.

 

Follow Charlotte Skeoch on Twitter: www.twitter.com/charlieskeoch

Any Tom Dick or Harry (but particularly Shakespeare) will tell you that the eyes are the window to the soul. The number one go-to for immediate character assassination...or love, if you're that way in...
Any Tom Dick or Harry (but particularly Shakespeare) will tell you that the eyes are the window to the soul. The number one go-to for immediate character assassination...or love, if you're that way in...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:30 AM on 01/04/2012
It's shallow and insulting to say that Hathaway is unsuitable for the part because she's not sexy enough, especially considering that she's beautiful and your complaint is based on something as vague as her eyes being 'naïve' and 'cowering'. I haven't seen Hathaway in enough films to really judge her acting ability, but that is what the casting should be based on, not something as nebulous, subjective, and indefinable as sex appeal. It remains to be seen whether she'll play Catwoman well; if she does, all kudos to Christopher Nolan for another excellent casting decision.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:48 AM on 01/04/2012
Exhumed?
11:09 AM on 01/02/2012
Actually, Julie Newmar is the "purrfect" Catwoman. Yes, I know she was not in line for it, but I was not "amewesed" to read that Anne Hathaway was going to play the role.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scairp
08:13 PM on 01/01/2012
I could have sworn I commented on this subject. Oh well, try try again. Yes, this is serious miscasting. When she was announced I immediately felt that she doesn't have the acting chops to pull off this role. She won't stand a chance against Christian Bale, IMO. He is no doubt chewing her up and spitting her out during the making of this film. Hey, maybe we are both wrong Charlotte. That would be nice, would it not?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StarDagger
The Welfare of the People is the Supreme Law
02:49 PM on 01/01/2012
You SOOOOOO do not get it!!!!!!!!!
11:31 PM on 12/31/2011
I think the comments in the article are uncalled for and one should wait until the movie comes out. I am rather certain the author didn't see anne hathaway in the role where she paid a wealthy Los angeles teen who gets involved in with gangs. Oh my god, she was so sexy in that, a real change in the way one looked at her, and I admit I own the movie. I'd not buy anything else she was in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peggy Kendrick
Edited micro-bio. Happy now!?
11:33 AM on 12/31/2011
I'll wait until I see the film to judge, like any intelligent person would.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mikeg0477
with my freeze ray I will stop the world
02:10 AM on 01/01/2012
I'm with you.
11:15 AM on 01/02/2012
Not necessary in this case. All thats needed is to see Julie Newmar's portrayal of the role in the repeats on ITV4 and compare that with any of Anne Hathaway's work & ask yourself: can she get her claws in to the role or will the fur fly? lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peggy Kendrick
Edited micro-bio. Happy now!?
12:33 PM on 01/02/2012
If we're going to include Julie Newmar then I'd like to vote Eartha Kitt. And if we're going to compare the work of Newmar to Hathaway then have a look at IMDB. While a delightful bit player Ms. Newmar was more a guest star on television sitcoms rather than a lead actress in films. Either Chris Nolan knows something you don't or he is very wrong. Either way, I'll wait for the theatrical release.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
12:23 AM on 12/31/2011
Actually, casting Bambi-eyed Anne Hathaway as Catwoman might be a good idea. It tricks you into thinking that she's the kind of characters whom Hathaway usually plays, but is in fact the opposite. Looks can be deceiving, you know.
11:00 AM on 12/31/2011
If she was playing Selina Kyle as a dewey eyed innocent then maybe you can argue that or if you knew nothing about Catwoman, but from the look of the trailers we are getting femme fatale who is as hard as nails, which we expect from Selina/Catwoman.

It is all going to come out in the wash when we all see the film.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scairp
08:51 PM on 01/01/2012
No way, give me Michelle Pfeiffer any day. It's too bad she isn't 30 anymore. I'd love to see her with Bale. She could certainly hold her own against him, and then some.