Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Cherie Blair

GET UPDATES FROM Cherie Blair
 

We Can't Afford to Ignore Half the Population

Posted: 27/09/2012 10:08

Writing from New York where I have been lucky enough to attend both the UN General Assembly and the Clinton Global Initiative, I have been struck by the mainstreaming of issues relating to women and girls at both events.

I have been fortunate enough to work with the Clinton Global Initiative team on developing the topic discussions in past years. With so much collaboration being done at such a high level, it's crucial to craft an agenda that covers the right priorities. This is pertinent now more than ever, with 2015 looming and the next round of Millennium Development Goals being decided. We need to focus on long-term, sustainable solutions. We need to consider what will really make a positive change in the world.

This year's Clinton Global Initiative theme was 'designing for impact' and gender equality was prominent. It permeated many of the discussions even when not officially on the agenda. Each year it seems there are more organisations and institutions joining forces to do so much on a grand scale on gender equality. With a theme like 'designing for impact', it's no surprise to see more done around women empowerment. Investing in women results in substantial returns. If corporations really want to achieve results on a large scale with knock-on benefits, they would be hard placed to find a more worthy cause.

See also:

Stop Writing About My Body

The Seduction of Magic Pills

Can You Joke About Rape?

Women Over 40: Are You Doing All the 'Right Things' but Still Not Losing Weight?

Prejudice in Briefs: Why Page Three Is Toxic to All Women

It is well documented that countries with greater gender equality have stronger economies. According to the UN, if women were given the opportunity to achieve their full potential, the Asia-Pacific economy could earn $89 billion annually. But the benefits of investing in women go far beyond the economic argument. Financial independence gives women greater control over their own and their children's lives. Economic security gives women a more influential voice in tackling injustice and discrimination in their communities and wider society. As women tend to reinvest their income into their children and businesses, the result is healthier families, stronger communities and ultimately a reduction in national poverty.

Out of a global population of some seven billion people, 50% of us are women. The world's women represent 40% of the workforce and are over 50% of the world's university students. Despite this significant contribution, women continue to face many formal and informal barriers that hinder their potential. Women entrepreneurs around the world still lack the business skills, technology, networks and access to finance they need to be successful in the long term.

LIKE HUFFPOST UK ON FACEBOOK|FOLLOW US ON TWITTER

We can't afford to ignore half the population. We will all gain through the input of able women helping their communities reach better decisions, not replacing men but working alongside them. We have to continue to develop opportunities. We have to lift unfair barriers which stop people from making the most of their potential. Giving women the chance to become financially independent and make the most of their talents is vital if we want to achieve equal opportunities for men and women.

President Obama addressed the UN General Assembly on Tuesday (25 September). I was struck by the strong emphasis he put on empowering women and girls. He announced the Equal Futures Partnership with countries from Peru to Tunisia, Finland to Jordan, Australia to Bangladesh joining the US and the EU in pledging to do more to achieve equal opportunities for women and girls across business, education and politics. It is time that we all work together across the world to bring the female half of the population onto an equal level playing field not just for their benefit, but for everyone's.

 

Follow Cherie Blair on Twitter: www.twitter.com/CherieBlairFndn

FOLLOW CANADA IMPACT
Writing from New York where I have been lucky enough to attend both the UN General Assembly and the Clinton Global Initiative, I have been struck by the mainstreaming of issues relating to women and g...
Writing from New York where I have been lucky enough to attend both the UN General Assembly and the Clinton Global Initiative, I have been struck by the mainstreaming of issues relating to women and g...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 135
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
01:37 on 20/10/2012
Cherie Blair would be better advised to give her enormous wealth to all those poor women she agonises over. Or is that a little outside of her sphere?
00:09 on 13/10/2012
Mrs Blair is just in favour of equality for everyone else, just not for herself and her spouse. I rember well her sordid self-enrichment through a series of prooerty deals. I thought Catholics were enjoined to build up treasure in heaven not here on Earth. Her spouse and his band of neo-conservatives cynically dubbed New Labour just continued Thatcher's privitisation madness, while abolishing many of our traditional rights and freedoms, and getting us involved in meaningless foreign wars at vast cost in financial terms and in human suffering for the civilians in the countries involved. As they both grew richer and richer, his party were imposing a minimum wage that was nothing but a bad joke. If she wants to do something for equality, I suggest that they donate 95% of their vast fortune to the NHS and the education sector, providing scholarships for those who now cannot afford the outrageous tuition fees that universities charge. There is no circle in hell that is low enough for those who enriched themselves while impoverishing the silent majority and making our lives in post-Blair Britain ever harder to endure.
20:26 on 02/10/2012
"It is well documented that countries with greater gender equality have stronger economies"...

Best examples are Saudi Arabia with a strong economy with good gender equality and UK with poor gender equality and the shops are closing down every other day..
What an absolute truth....what pearls of wisdom. Long live the Blairs..
16:52 on 02/10/2012
Is there any money in this ?
11:20 on 01/10/2012
cant stand cherie blair regardless of what shes saying and whether it makes any sense or has a valid argument ! simply because of her involvement in pushing through ridiculous human rights laws without ensuring that the same laws designed to protect people or make their lives better only succeed in people in the uk for example being put upon forced to let terrorists fanactics murderers rapists etc...sue organisations ,authorities for millions all on tax payers money ! or brussels overuling our governments and dictating do and donts
21:00 on 01/10/2012
Would you ming expressing yourself in English? I would appreciate it.
19:44 on 02/10/2012
I don't think he would 'ming' expressing in ENGLISH..erm...sir.
And, bye the way, who wouldn't soilicit your esteemed appreciation.

LOL.....LOL
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:39 on 01/10/2012
women are great and under appreciated ,most raise kids and work and let me tell you it's not easy i've tried it.

so we should realize that they are stronger and have as much heart as any man because i know lots of women who are examples.

don't forget who gives birth,who carries life wow i'm sure as a man i would not want the job I've got to admit

and everyone and everything on the planet came from a mother !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wendyweb47
Keeping an open mind
16:33 on 30/09/2012
While Ms Blair makes great points about how life improves for communities overall when women are schooled and given health care and equal access to services, sadly many in this world don't want this to happen.

Just think how many times we cheer when we hear of a girls school opening in Afghanistan and how quickly it is burned to the ground (often with girls inside) or the students are attacked with acid on their way home.

There are so many extremists who wish things to stay the way they are for women (or even go backwards) that this is one of those battles that is two steps forward, one step back.

However, small victories must be championed and we need to continue to help women become more self sufficient. Small loan organizations like kiva.org help women start businesses or buy livestock that generates income for their families.

The fight for equality in most of the world is a steep uphill battle, but it must be fought by both men and women of conscience.
19:25 on 30/09/2012
Why should men of conscience fight to give "women greater control over their own and their children's lives." Are children the sole concern and interest of women? Are they the property of women such that they are "theirs?" Too often the expression "women and their children" is used as though the interests of the former necessarily correspond with the interests of the latter. When the interests of children are identified in any shape, form or fashion as separate from the interests of both men and women, the interests of children are not served. Any child who is the mere appendix in "women and their children" is an unfortunate child. Indeed, any woman who identifies her children's interests as the same as her own proves herself to be untrustworthy in relation to them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wendyweb47
Keeping an open mind
19:53 on 30/09/2012
Children are certainly not the sole concern and interest of women. However, study after study in developing nations has shown that when you assist women financially (i.e. small biz loans) they use the money to improve the lives of their children. However, men do not have the same track record by a large margin. The money is often squandered and not paid back to the lender, whereas women have on average an over 95% rate of paying back the lender.  If you look at cultures around the globe,  overall women are more likely to be the sole caretakers of their children.  I do NOT mean to demean the value of men or fathers. In fact, I wish more men would step up and be the valued person in their childrens' lives they should be. I believe we would have a lot fewer social problems if men understood the value of fatherhood - and that it means more than bragging about being a baby daddy.  BTW the phrase "women and children" is such an ancient phrase I doubt it will ever be erased from society. I don't believe it should be interpreted as a dig to men. 
09:24 on 01/10/2012
Continuation:

At the lowest level, it shows that the employees with a brain are cashier or 'front of Office' are women. Men could not usually cope. However, the two world wars showed that women were at least as good in factory positions - at whatever level, as men. There are still stigma attached to the ability of women to be engineers or doctors, but watch out! They are overtaking men in several of these disciplines! I agree with Cherie Blair and her ilk! It's time women were co-opted to the highest of places and this will be the salvation of humanity. If men carry on in their traditional warring ways, we are all doomed. Women Popes or Ayatollahs or Generals are very few... I am delighted to say. But then, intelligence and science is always feared by the stupid and the uneducated.
14:16 on 30/09/2012
Dear Ms Blair...are you speaking as a woman...or as an honorary man.....and a very self interested and deluded honorary man...like your husband....who is so weak and self obsessed I doubt whether he actually qualifies as a human being.....due to him causing the mass death of innocent people...there are women who are worth listening to....but you are not one of them.....but you get the opportunity to lecture us anyway.....so it goes
18:00 on 30/09/2012
No she doesn't. Nobody has forced you to read it. Stick to the war, you were on a winner there.
13:59 on 30/09/2012
Cherie Blair? Lost the plot again? Well who would have thought....
13:14 on 30/09/2012
Considering your husbands policies, which you stood idly by and endorsed, you have a lot of gall with this article. I guess those innocent women in Afghanistan and Iran simply don't count right cherie? You are a joke along with your war criminal husband now go away.
13:08 on 30/09/2012
THATS JUST A JOKE UNITY FOR ALL GOD BLESS THE U.S.
13:08 on 30/09/2012
N MEN NEED TO START THERE OWN HOOTERS CALL IN BIG PACAGES.................. GOD BLESS THE U.S.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
05:46 on 30/09/2012
Women need to start their own corporations. Use a little of that gender bias. Grrrrl power, all the way home. All-female staff, female CEO's, whole 9 yards, show the guys up like they mean business at every quarterly stockholder's meeting. Develop good products, and sell them. Nothing beats hard proof.
12:37 on 30/09/2012
They can't to that, it's sexism.......... (said in a sarcastic voice)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BOBinPS
Really?
02:10 on 01/10/2012
Ot 3500 years of history......It has got to be sexism. Just GOTTA be.......
20:45 on 29/09/2012
Divide and rule an old and tried tactic that seems to work every time
sheep and goats ...............the class system ...and everyone signs on

then the poisoned hook... social mobility the one small escape hatch for
the lower classes ...but only for the few
THE SYSTEM OF CONTROL
18:06 on 30/09/2012
It baffles me that people feel it constructive to deny one form of discrimination to promote another. Both are obvious truths, and both know it, therefore neither will ever be persuaded otherwise. You would think co-operation would be the more productive choice, wouldn't you? Not you, I mean. You are the one that is presently baffling me.
14:38 on 29/09/2012
Classic Cherie! Always trying to make out she has the rights of 'ordinary people' in mind, so long as there is money in it. This is the woman responsible in no small part for the imposition of the 'Human Rights Act' and she has made an absolute fortune from it. With this fortune she has insulated herself from any of the detrimental consequences that the Act has brought to the UK. I will only ever see her as a self centred, money obsessed female version of her husband Tony.