
BPAS is launching the first ever nationwide campaign in support of women's choice. Recent comments by cabinet ministers combined with an upsurge in anti-abortion activity outside clinics show we cannot take for granted that the women we know will always have access to the services they need, when they need them.
The discussion about abortion exists at a number of levels, but rarely does it reflect the reality and diversity of the tens of thousands of women who come to us for advice about unplanned pregnancy every year. Sadly stereotypes often prevail - women are often cast as feckless and irresponsible for seeking abortion after finding themselves with an unwanted pregnancy - or career women interested only in their own personal goals. Recent comments and campaigns by politicians opposed to abortion often imply that women do not know what they are doing when they request abortion and need protecting from themselves, or that what they are doing is morally wrong - and that their pregnancies need protecting from the women themselves.
One in three women will have an abortion in her lifetime. They are not a particular 'type' of woman, they are everywoman - of all ages and all circumstances. Contraception fails, and sometimes we fail to use it properly. Amid incessant talk of infertility, many women - both young and middle-aged - underestimate how easy it is to get pregnant. BPAS sees women with unplanned pregnancies not long after giving birth, having been told that breastfeeding provides effective contraceptive protection. We also see women whose lives have been turned upside down when a problem is found with a much wanted pregnancy, or when personal circumstances change so much that a planned pregnancy can no longer be carried to term.
These women do not have abortions because they do not know what they are doing, or because they have no sense of right and wrong. They have abortions because it is the right thing for them and their families at that time in their lives. Only the woman herself can make that judgment - not the banner-bearing protester outside, the health secretary - or even the doctor providing her care.
These women will be mothers, daughters, sisters and friends. They will be women we all know, and that is what we hope to bring home with our campaign. We live in a country where the majority of us support a woman's ability to make a choice when faced with an unplanned pregnancy, but where a vocal and determined minority have the potential to undermine women's access to care - if we are not careful.
Abortion is a fundamental part of women's reproductive healthcare - for all the women in our lives, let's make sure we protect it.
Follow Clare Murphy on Twitter: www.twitter.com/bpas1968
Abortion in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Abortion | Abortion clinics | Abortion information, advice and ...
Northern Ireland's first abortion clinic hires security guards
Scotland has the second highest teenage abortion rate in the world
NI abortion clinic 'will be regulated'
Belfast Clinic for Abortions Due to Open
Anti-abortion campaigners threaten to shut down Belfast clinic, the first of ...
Your lies won't fly here.
You have absolutely no evidence whatsoever that abortion is being used to suppress anyone, that you would even suggest such a thing is laughable.
The poll you seem to be citing on public opinion is, at best, 7 years out of date. A more recent survey by the same polling organisation (YouGov) indicates that 47% favour keeping the limit as it is, and an additional 4% favour extending the limit beyond 24 weeks - so you are in fact in a minority.
http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/64gbx6amxp/Abortion%20Results%20121009.pdf
This survey was conducted less than two weeks ago.
I do admire your arrogance and assumption, as is usual in cases like yours, of the right to denigrate and attack those with views different to yours.
The half-truths and obscurantism you accuse me of is, in, fact the tactic used by the anti-life, pro-abortion appartachiks - one you will be familiar with and adept at.
Address the real issues, not just the ones you think you have easy answers to.
1) It is her body. If you cared that much you would have been informed if the father was worth contacting. Often it is probably because the father has left the woman's life. The thinking on the woman's part is probably this: "He didn't care about me, he treated me badly, he was bad for me, he would be bad for my child"
2) It is her body, she does not have to devote 9 months of her life to something that the father alone wants. You want a child? Find a an egg donor/surrogate mother.
3) Not the best, but the man could take on the child if he so wished. The location of the father I'm pretty sure would be sought if he was in contact or worth contacting
4) Same as above
5) I'm pretty sure fathers have legal rights to access etc, you're spouting rubbish
The same thing goes for downplaying sexual discrimination and mistreatment.
We can easily measure how healthy our society is by how positively it views and treats the women within it.
Let's stop this nonsense before we end up like those from whom we our separated by a common language.
Abortion affects others: it ends a life as a result of a choice made.
The life of the unborn child should not be cut out of the picture. The unwanted child's life is as valuable as the wanted child's life, who is the born child in the picture.
I think what you mean is, 'abortion offends me and my right to tell other people what to do'.
Most people act on the assumption that varying forms of life deserve differing standards of moral duty, often based on that life's capacity for thought, intelligence, consciousness. For example, most cans of tuna will proudly state that the fish inside was caught and killed by a process which was 'dolphin friendly'. Why should we care about the fate of a dolphin but not the tuna? Why do we happily consume pigs, chickens and cows on an industrial scale but balk at the idea of eating dogs or cats? Why save the whale or the panda but cull the badger?
Whether it's rational or not, we do not feel the same obligations towards all life uniformly. The most plausible explanation might be that we value, not simply bare life, but life which is capable of conscious experience, and thus can suffer. Before about 24-26 weeks, the foetus' brain is not sufficiently developed to experience anything.
I've been disquietened by the recent neocon-inspired 'thinking' concerning the status/availability of abortion in the UK.. the 'opinions' of ministers are unhelpful at best and blatantly inappropriate at worst.
This 'opinion' aired prominently by the Health Minister has been purposefully 'leaked' to gauge public opinion on the extremely personal issue of pregnancy termination.
Let's be crystal clear; the present law has rescued countless women whose only recourse, before the 1967 Act, was to self-abort or resort to the backstreets.
Before the 1967 Act, women were stigmatised by society; now, in the main, their personal decision is recognised as their inalienable right to chose what happens to & with their bodies.
This right must remain.
No stigma, bias or impeachment of women who decide - for whatever reason - to seek a termination.
...and certainly no religious numbskullery influencing future reassessment of time limits; let's leave that to proven medical advance, doctors, health professions & the woman concerned in the privacy of the consulting room.
Maintain the 1967 AoP; support those who seek abortion and challenge any stigma, shame or fear those who are iealistically opposed to abortion seek to inflict on women in what must be one of the most monumentous decisions of her life.
From a thinking man who supports unreservedly the right of women to determine what happens to their bodies.
If you do not give consent for a woman to go ahead with a pregnancy, then you are not legally obliged to support the child. If you are clear that you do not want a child, you have no obligation towards one should you father one.