iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Daniel Warner

GET UPDATES FROM Daniel Warner
 

Bisexuality: Is It Fun, Non Committal or Just Plain Greedy?

Posted: 26/11/2012 00:00

I like to think of myself as someone who's focused, determined, single minded and sure of what they want. I don't need to be asked twice what I want for lunch, what I want in life and what I want in the bedroom.

I've never really been one to flip-flop from one decision to the other, to change sides or to "hunt with the hounds and run with the hares" (as my grandmother used to say), but recently I found a diary of my 18-year-old self, and it made me question my feelings, my perceptions and my attitude towards people who quite happily sit on the fence when it comes to their sexuality and their bedmates.

As an adult I have never really given bisexuality much thought. When people described themselves as being bisexual I automatically assumed they were gay (if male), trying to make themselves more interesting (if female) or desperate to broaden their appeal and fan base (if famous).

I thought saying you're bisexual was just a cop out, just like saying you're a Liberal Democrat.

Bisexuality always seemed a tad worthy yet at the same time totally non-committal to me.

"Oh, you're bisexual? That probably means you also only drink fair trade coffee, ride a bicycle and recycle your newspapers every second Tuesday doesn't it?"

For me, bisexuality didn't cut the mustard, butter the bread or go anywhere near to floating my boat. Rather than conjuring up images of sex parties and all out hedonism, it left me with visions of wet Wednesdays (and not in a good way), unshaven armpits and mohair sweaters.
I have never suffered indecisive people. You make a choice and stick with it. Good or bad, wrong or right, back door or front door, you better know your way in and your way out and just get on with it. Bisexuality seemed lazy rather than greedy. I couldn't imagine anyone who would be thrilled finding out that their partner didn't really mind if they were Jack or Jill, unless, of course, they were both being taken up the hill together.

But then I found my diary, and in it I'd written all the thoughts, feelings and experiences of my 18-year-old self. I thought it would be an easy read, it would be light hearted and it would just be the same me as I am now, except less aware or open to experiences. I was wrong.

My 18-year-old self wasn't sure of himself at all. Sexually I had no idea where to stick my emotions, my heart or any other piece of my anatomy BUT I was open to all. I had no preconceived notions and I wasn't willing to align myself to any side, nor tick a certain box. I was feeling my way around and although youth had a huge part to play with regards to my innocence and fear, it also made me aware of so many choices that I wouldn't even consider now, but the sad thing is, I didn't go forward with them or act upon them.

I know that it is expected that we experiment when we are young, but I grew up in an age when HIV/AIDS was a very real and deadly threat. In the late 80s and through the 1990s the threat of Aids was publicised on television by government funded ads of icebergs just below the surface of a blackened sea, of red lasers hitting random people between the eyes in dark and seedy nightclubs and by skeletal men dying in hospital beds on Benetton posters.

Sex was scary and HIV was the slasher movie to end all slasher movies, so for almost all of my late teens and some of my early twenties, I steered well clear of anything that meant I could end up being post coital.

I missed out! I was the product of an age where it was okay to have the dream but if you really wanted the drive you best cover yourself from head to toe in rubber and be fully aware of your sexual inhibitions and hang ups.

So what's changed now? HIV and Aids are still as deadly, even if we don't think they are, but people's attitudes to heterosexuality / bisexuality and homosexuality are more blurred. Now, it's fashionable to kiss a girl and like it. It's okay to admit you may have had a dalliance with Jim when you're really into Jessie and it's not frowned upon if you can get it up for Belinda when you're getting down with Bill.

Bisexuality is en vogue, it's the new black and it's the boy/girl thing that's on every boy and girls lips.

Apparently, it's become more than fashionable to become more than just hetero or homosexual.

Choosing a gender you're sexually attracted to and sticking to it is so last year, so passƩ and frankly, so limiting to your life experience. Girls can do boys who do boys like they're girls and no one will raise an expertly plucked eyebrow or even shake a hairy fist.

It's the age of being open to all and open all hours.

It's just such a shame I missed it, by almost 20 years.

 

Follow Daniel Warner on Twitter: www.twitter.com/picnicdontpanic

FOLLOW GAY VOICES
 
 
  • Comments
  • 163
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:57 AM on 12/28/2012
There was a time when morality determined legality but now I think legality confuses morality. Basically they are are informal and formal mechanisms used to control 'others' by those in power and used to define whether an action is acceptable or reprehensible.
What does it truly matter how a person gains pleasure from their body or with whom they share their bodies? There are sexual behaviours I do not ever want to try but that doesn't mean I should criticize the person who enjoys them. If you get your pleasure from being with a man, a woman, both or several combinations thereof then have at it and stay safe.
Inflict no harm.
10:57 PM on 12/09/2012
"Love is love... Not greedy..." As a Bisexual man and activist in Chicago, Bisexuals exist! Yay!
06:49 PM on 12/03/2012
I'm coming to this party late, but as a proud dyed-in-the-wool verified bisexual man, I think it's great that a gay-identified blogger realises [sic, British] he could have been bi too over the past 20 years--and is palpably wistful about what he's missed and cannot now experience.

For more adults to bring attention to and awareness of the bisexual option, I suggest we have a better sense of humour [sic] and not reflexively pile onto someone we fear has the power to perpetuate a bunch of over-the-top stereotypes merely by alluding to them.
04:54 PM on 12/01/2012
I normally don't bother to comment on articles but I read this one, then read the comments below and the authors responses, so I decided to read it again.
The second reading of it just confirmed what I thought in the first place, it's a cheeky, fun piece and if anything it talks about the author over coming ideas of what he thought bisexuals were.
The comments by most below probably reinforce his initial thoughts of bisexuals being "worthy".
Lighten up people, you're not helping to further or dismiss any stereo types, you're reinforcing them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daniel Kauwe
i like stuff except when i do not
06:18 PM on 11/30/2012
maybe we could just stop defining people as a function of their sexuality...like honestly, should that really be a significant feature of a human being?
photo
jonredbird
To Twwweet to Eat, so Fly Away.
02:27 PM on 12/04/2012
Hey Daniel, you have a fantastic thought and point here, and I agree with you X's 2. Here is what I put in another poster you were in contact with earlier::::Should NOT be anyone WHO has to WORRY about being LABELED. Everyone should be EQUAL in each others eyes, and treated in an EQUALITY type lifestyle. I know it's "IMO"......but its a wonderful wish that I would (like many others in the WORLD) see come TRUE. Now, wouldn't that be WONDERFUL!!!! You take care Daniel, hope you have a nice day. JR
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Galician
Keep calm and carry on
10:18 PM on 11/29/2012
I don't know if bisexuality is in vogue, but your article is full of outdated clichƩs.
09:21 PM on 11/29/2012
I *see*, upon re-read and knowledge of author intentions, what was trying to be done here - I think. That is the problem here. This might have been less drama-tastic if it was a vlog where people could hear the tones coming across in the article. The article, as written word, doesn't really convey any humour in it. At least, it didn't to me and obviously didn't to many others either.

I could go into the ways it was offensive but I'll just say this instead:
It ISN'T okay to be with boys and girls as anything more than experimentation. When bisexual people settle down, it's almost inevitable that people will ask "Oh, so does this mean you're *insert sexuality here*, now?" And though you may have dated bisexual men before, there are still plenty of people (hetero and homosexual) who turn down bisexual people because they fear the lack of commitment, or competition from the other sex. A one night stand might be okay, but seriously calling yourself bisexual?

So yes, we will be sensitive when it sounds like someone is telling us we have it easy because "bisexuality is trendy!" without challenging that assumption in any way, shape, or form. We're sick of it. And I, personally, am just tired of a society where I feel that disclosing who I am means it's okay for people to interrogate me on the validity of my feelings.
06:30 PM on 11/29/2012
I think this article just really establishes the old prejudices even if that wasn't the intention. I don't think bi-sexuality is "en vogue" it's just that now that a newer generation has emerged that didn't have the closed minded parents we did are open to the truth about themselves. They are not pigeon holed which is what a closed minded society does. The world today is much more open thanks to things like the internet which allows people to see they are not the only ones who feel a certain way. This builds confidence and openness about themselves. I was in my 20's when many of my friends came out of the closet only to have their families disown them. Recently a co worker came out to his family and he was supported by his family who were excited to meet his partner. Society has come a long way, but it still has a way to go.
02:32 PM on 11/29/2012
The problem with this article is not that the bisexuals who responded are humourless and oversensitive. The problem is that there is nothing in it that makes it clear that it is meant to be irreverent and tongue-in-cheek.

You've fallen into the trap of Poe's Law, where pretending to be superficial and biphobic has lead people to think that you're superficial and biphobic:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law

I don't think you can blame the reader for that. Instead of saying "you've misread and misinterpreted the article" over and over, maybe you should consider that possibility that you've miscommunicated.
This comment has been removed.
12:44 PM on 11/28/2012
The first time I read this article it upset me, so I read some of the comments and your responses to them. You said multiple times that people where misunderstanding the intended meaning so I reread it and I got a different meaning the second time. I would like to explain what in think you intended and please tell me if I'm getting it. You are saying that you used to have negative feelings about bisexuality but you have since had a change of heart and actually feel deprived of the opportunity that you feel young people now have to experiment with both sexes. Am I getting this right?
04:05 AM on 11/28/2012
Dear Daniel, you clearly have a very overrated sense of yourself as a humorist or satirist. Your commentary is one bad bisexual stereotype after another. You know nothing about the suffering bisexual, pansexual and fluid people go through to understand themselves and communicate their true nature to people who are not like them.
On top of being completely misunderstood, we suffer discrimination in the workplace, violence when we are out as bisexual and studies have shown we suffer higher rates of depression, anxiety and suicidality than straights, gay men or lesbians. And yet you're content to write us off as lazy, greedy, hedonistic and trendy.
I think all you've succeeded in doing is displaying for all to see your own ignorance and shallowness.
12:10 AM on 11/28/2012
Oh dear Daniel. Congratulations for managing to include almost every negative stereotype of LGBT people in your poorly written and researched article that indeed resembles a naive 18 year olds diary entry. Infact as an 18 year old you sound as though your were an inquisitive and open minded individual, however it is clear that these qualities have since been shrouded to reinforce yourself and your hetrosexuality.
12:08 AM on 11/28/2012
It seems that a lot of people are upset by this article, and rightly so. As a bisexual cis-female, I would like to add my voice to those who are offended. Daniel Warner just shows his monosexism in this article, and proves he does not know what he is talking about, and obviously did not even attempt to find out before writing this. He just plays right into the stereotypes.

I would like to say that I am not confused. I have been equally attracted to both men and women (and in-between/other) for as long as I can remember. Sexuality is not a choice, at least in my experience. I spent my adolescence in an existential crisis because I was not accepted by my family, and I tried for years to "pick" men and failed. I am only "out" to a select few people, you can forget telling people about my bisexuality for attention. I am not polyamorous, and I have not had nearly as many sexual partners as many of my straight friends. I am fairly picky, I just think that all sexes and gender presentations can be attractive.

There are a lot of misunderstandings about bisexuality, and this article, whatever the intent, was misguided if not malicious. I would ask Daniel Warner to rethink what he expresses in this article.
10:00 PM on 11/27/2012
I had a comment on here but it's somehow been removed. It wasn't against the rules, it just pointed out how offensive the article is. However, having read the author's (rather desperate and unconvincing) responses to the other comments, I'll change my original one to say "It comes across as offensive, and if intended to be light-hearted, it falls very wide of the mark. It's an offensive article.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Daniel Warner
10:53 PM on 11/27/2012
Offensive to some but liked by others. We are all entitled to our opinions and to interpret the article how we see fit. My "rather desperate and unconvincing" responses to other comments? Again, that's your opinion. I have explained my reasons for writing the article and the thoughts behind it and once again,I stand by them.There is no desperation there. You found the article offensive, other people did not. I blog for The Huffington Post to start conversation, and this did. Thanks for your comment.
12:05 AM on 11/28/2012
Yes, it is my opinion (I assumed that was the implication here - none of us is authoritative). And others can have their own opinions. Clearly, a lot of the people commenting here share my view. I stand by my original comment that the article *as posted* - and I've read it again - contains no suggestion of being tongue-in-cheek, or intended to "start conversation" (whatever that means - is this a get-out clause for any kind of bigotry?). The fact that *so many* people shared my interpretation of the article suggests that, at best, it was badly and incautiously worded, and at worst, blatantly offensive and bigoted. I call your responses "desperate and unconvincing" as none of them (and yes, I've read all of them) explain why so many of us "misinterpreted" your article, or justify the way you went about writing the article. Do you not accept that there has been widespread condemnation of your article? Do you think all of these people are wrong?

In my opinion, there is no purpose served by writing this kind of thing, nor does it develop anyone's understanding of human sexuality. The risk (whether it was intended to be tongue-in-cheek or not) is that people who hold prejudices such as this will merely consider them reinforced by the Huffington Post.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:29 AM on 11/29/2012
We are all entitled to our opinions
--------------------------
Daniel, we all say that (me included) but it is not true. We label millions as 'intolerant' and define them as not worth listening to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Galician
Keep calm and carry on
10:15 PM on 11/29/2012
Offensive and lame in my humble opinion.