iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dr Matthew Ashton

GET UPDATES FROM Dr Matthew Ashton
 

Borgen Is Brillant. Why Can't Britain Seem to Make Decent Political Dramas Anymore?

Posted: 07/01/2013 00:00

So Borgen is finally back on our TV screens filling the hole left by The Killing and Homeland. Second series are often tricky things to get right, especially when the first was such a success; but on the evidence so far Borgen seems to be off to a good start.

This begs the question, why don't we seem to be able to do decent political television drama in this country anymore? We still do TV that covers political and social concerns; but these issues are often smuggled in, disguised within police thrillers and period productions. However there's very little serious drama looking at the people who run our country, the decisions they make that affect us all, and the general state of the nation.

Over the last two decades or so the US has produced The West Wing, John Adams, K Street, Boss, Homeland and The Newsroom (what The Hour would like to be). Even though they're science fiction and fantasy I'd still argue that Battlestar Galactica and Game of Thrones are as good as anything on the above list.

When we've tried to do something similar the results have not exactly been awe inspiring. For instance; The Amazing Mrs Pritchard, Party Animals, The State Within, The Last Enemy, Blackout and Absolute Power. None of these have been another House of Cards, G.B.H, State of Play, Edge of Darkness, Boys from the Black Stuff, Our Friends in the North or Bill Brand. There has been the odd one off drama that's been decent; The Road to East Finchley, Margaret, and Ten Days to War spring to mind, but these have been few and far between, and all based on real events/people.

Fictional political drama has been a rarer beast. Recently Channel 4 produced the four part mini-series Secret State to a not exactly rapturous response. The fact that it was a remake of the excellent A Very British Coup from 1988 demonstrates the paucity of ambition of current TV executives. Coincidentally a remake of Yes, Prime Minister is soon going to hit our screens and it'll be interesting to see how it fares. Revisiting past glories is rarely a good idea, especially when the original was so brilliant. Watching them again it's striking how each episode is as relevant now as it was thirty years ago.

Today you have to look to the world of comedy to find any decent political TV. The Thick of It and 2012 were both better, and more truthful, than anything else we've seen in the last few years. The most recent series of The Thick of It is meant to be the last; which is probably a good thing as real life frequently conspired to be more bizarre and embarrassing than anything the writers could come up with. If you'd written an episode where the mayor of London became stuck on a zipline, or the Chancellor of the Exchequer was threatened with being thrown out of a first class train carriage, you'd be accused of being too farfetched. It's almost like genuine politicians watched it every week and then bet each other whether they could do something more outlandish. Equally watching a fictional character being booed by tens of thousands of people inside the Olympic stadium just wouldn't have the same cringe inducing entertainment factor as the real thing.

Perhaps it's because we're simply too jaded about politics, and politicians in general, to enjoy the pantomime antics of a Francis Urquhart or Michael Murray; or too cynical to believe in a competent British heroic leader like President Bartlet. Either way, Borgen should keep us entertained for a few more weeks showing us how it ought to be done.

 

Follow Dr Matthew Ashton on Twitter: www.twitter.com/drmatthewashton

FOLLOW TV
So Borgen is finally back on our TV screens filling the hole left by The Killing and Homeland. Second series are often tricky things to get right, especially when the first was such a success; but on ...
So Borgen is finally back on our TV screens filling the hole left by The Killing and Homeland. Second series are often tricky things to get right, especially when the first was such a success; but on ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:51 PM on 01/08/2013
No, we aren't jaded. The writers (I'm one of them) are straining at the leash. It's just that the commissioners don't commission dramas they fear the public might not watch in the order of 5million plus viewers. The problem lies with the BBC, and it's deeply political. The BBC fears for its future, so is determined not to court controversy and to justify its existence through consistently high ratings. This means it is now institutionally incapable of taking risks. It has become a creative follower, not a leader. And when I say the BBC, I must emphasise that the 'Controller of Fiction' (Stalin couldn't have invented a better title), together with the Controllers of BBC 1 and 2 are the sole commissioners of drama. A handful of execs can 'champion' projects, but the C of F is the only decision maker who counts. Your £400 million annual BBC drama spend rests in his hands. Tell me that's a good system for creating innovative and groundbreaking drama, and I'll serve you Dodo for dinner.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Platt
12:42 PM on 01/08/2013
Other countries still respect their politicians. Americans practically worship theirs. We Brits have nothing but a sour sense of contempt for ours.

Britain doesn't like its political system very much. All our best political TV is satire, we don't turn out to elections, we don't express surprise when politicians lie, cheat or steal... we seem to have given up on the whole process. Any time anyone a politicians looks to be a decent human being interested in actually doing good, the tabloids tear them down. It's happened so often that you can't really blame people for being jaded.

TV like The West Wing has a buoyant sense of optimism - it's passionate about its subject matter, and feels as though it truly believes in the system it portrays. Britain hasn't had that kind of enthusiasm for decades. It's why all our political telly is so bloody bitter.
10:30 AM on 01/08/2013
Good piece.

Im thinking about why screen writers have such a hard time distilling what it is Brits believe as a nation. Brits were pluralists even before they decided to go nation raiding on an imperial scale.
For whatever reason, Brits dont get as excited about their own nation building myths like the French or the Americans. Perhaps despite all the hooha over Europe and mass immigration Brits ARE fundamentally secure in their heritage and dont need to examine it in order to bolster themselves?

Brits certainly do believe in community, flags and in nationhood as last summer's celebrations attest too, but then look over the Irish Sea to see what the 'Loyalists' are doing over flag protests and most Brits will consider the over reaction contemptible.

Borgen makes the ordinary interesting and complex by focussing on relationships. The UK loved the spiteful coalition relationships as portrayed in The Thick of it recently.
The West Wing was a liberal wet dream during the Bush years- America as wish fulfilment. Brits just arent sentimental like that.

I think it would take a talented writer on his best day to try and encapsulate that dichotomy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JakobHunter
Bloke /English
08:03 PM on 01/07/2013
There have been some good ones since then , for example *Blackout*
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dr Matthew Ashton
08:47 PM on 01/07/2013
I wasn't a fan. I though it crossed the line from drama in arch-melodrama. I also thought quite a few of the performers over-acted horribly. There were also a few too many wobbly camera angles for my liking. The only thing that made it watchable in my opinion was the always dependable Christopher Eccleston.

However despite its good point I don't think its going to stand the test of time and we'll still be talking about it in twenty years time (of course I could easily be wrong).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JakobHunter
Bloke /English
07:53 PM on 01/07/2013
What about " Blackout " with Chritopher Ecclestone ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:55 PM on 01/07/2013
YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH....................

A VERY BRITISH COUP 1980s ..............

turns out The british security services do bugg cabinet members communications...........

turns out The british security services did use agents disguised as miners during the miners strike...

turns out The british security services ......HAD NO INVOLVEMENT IN THE MURDER OF
DR DAVID KELLY.......................

THE TRUTH IS STRANGER THAN FICTION IN BRITISH POLITICS..........
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dr Matthew Ashton
06:56 PM on 01/07/2013
I'd agree with the bugging and the disguising themselves as miners. I've yet to be convinced about David Kelly though. Have you read the book Voodoo Histories? It has a chapter on the David Kelly affair that pokes great big holes in many of the conspiracy theories about the death.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
05:30 PM on 01/07/2013
Based solely on my viewing only one show, the opening one of this new series, I would say it is watchable but remarkably far from being brilliant.This particular one with the stroke at the end was quite contrived. Cant even begin to compare with Miachael Crichton's State of Fear.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dr Matthew Ashton
07:05 PM on 01/07/2013
I found State of Fear a bit ranty for my tastes. It was also the point where Crichton really started to take himself too seriously. I've seen a speech by a climate scientist who rips Crichton apart for completely misrepresenting his work. He had slides from a few pages of Crichton's work and what his original paper actually said. The disparity was rather worrying. Also I think Crichton and the whole Michael Crowley thing was just downright creepy.

I tend to stick to Le Carre thrillers these days. Probably one of the best English novelists since the war.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
08:58 PM on 01/07/2013
Well ok but look at the opening scenes in Afghanisatan, it seemed all a bit too absurd ! very hard to take seriousily even allowing for a certain amount of suspension of disbelief.
And is there some rule that says the country countries must intertwine children so much into theirpolice/politics drama ?
The love tangle with one of the PM's aides seems a bit cliched and the story about the drunk editor was fairly cliched as well I am afraid.
The more I think about it, i am afrid the more Cheap tv drama it seems to me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
battleofalma
12:13 PM on 01/07/2013
I think we're too cynical of our politicians to make something like Borgen. Borgen is ultimately sympathetic with the politicians and the difficulties they face, and American dramas like the West Wing have the sentimental idealistic attitude that the President of the United States of America will "do the right thing", with a tear in his eye and lots of staring into the distance and faith in the American people and quoting Lincoln and so on.
But I can’t see the British easily sympathising with any British politician on screen without unwieldy explanations about how they didn’t go to Eaton and didn’t fiddle their expenses just to bring them up from immediate negative assumptions to a positive. It would be a clunky and contrived first few episodes at least.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dr Matthew Ashton
03:12 PM on 01/07/2013
I agree that in most of our best political dramas the politicians are the bad guys (House of Cards, Edge of Darkness etc). The ones where politicians are portrayed in a positive light tend to be the ones that have failed.

It still doesn't explain why we haven't had a decent political drama in recent years though. I'd be quite happy to watch something where a MP schemes against his or her rivals and plots their way to the top. Machiavellian intrigue is something we seem to do pretty well in this country (I, Claudius is a great example of it).
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ian Rennie
It irritates people that I'm a librarian :)
07:55 AM on 01/07/2013
"None of these have been another House of Cards, G.B.H, State of Play, Edge of Darkness, Boys from the Black Stuff, Our Friends in the North or Bill Brand."

Apart from State Of Play, of course. A British political drama from the last ten years good enough that you use it as an example of what British political drama from the last ten years hasn't been as good as.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dr Matthew Ashton
08:50 AM on 01/07/2013
State of Play came out in 2003 so only just within the last ten years (also I didn't specify ten years in the article). However I'd still argue that British TV hasn't produced a political drama as good since.

Considering our reputation for quality television (mostly), I think my point still stands e.g. in the last few years there hasn't been a classic British political/drama thriller. In fact our attempts at one have been pretty poor. I can't think of anything since State of Play that rivals Cathy come home or Boys from the Blackstuff in terms of being era defining.
06:44 AM on 01/07/2013
Not just political drama or gentler comedy political offerings. There doesn't seem to be much in the way of biting political satire these days either - which is strange,because right now we need it so badly to lampoon and ridicule those in power. I'd have thought,for example,that 'Spitting Image' could have a field day with the Coalition Government.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dr Matthew Ashton
08:54 AM on 01/07/2013
I agree. I think we do need something genuinely angry and savage, and Mock the Week and the Ten o'clock Show certainly aren't it. I know its a cliché to say that it isn't as good as it used to be but 'Have I got News for You' has really gone downhill since Angus was booted off. Both Hislop and Merton look bored and a lot of the time they don't even cover politics anymore.

It's a shame the Two Johns aren't on any more. Some of their stuff was incredibly sharp. Luckily The Thick of It was terrific but now that's come to an end. I'd be happy to be proven wrong but I don't hold out a great deal of hope for this Yes Prime Minister remake.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JakobHunter
Bloke /English
07:55 PM on 01/07/2013
"I don't hold out a great deal of hope for this Yes Prime Minister remake"

I agree some things are sacrosacnt and should be left alone