Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dr. Peter Ferentzy

GET UPDATES FROM Dr. Peter Ferentzy
 

Evicting the Occupiers of Capitalism

Posted: 22/11/11 13:03 GMT

From London to Toronto, New York to Vancouver, the 'Occupiers' of capitalism are facing evictions and other challenges. Clearly, legitimate debates ensue over one's right to protest versus the rights of locals to enjoy their neighborhoods as they normally do. However, where people stand on these matters has, for the most part, had more to do with sympathy or animosity to the cause - one's views on constitutionality and other such matters are then doctored to suit the one's politics. Hey, we're all human, right?

So maybe it's best to focus on goals and attitudes. I see people in the media, and on the street, putting down the many occupations going on worldwide - "crazy", "delinquent", "juvenile", "unrealistic".

OK, let's do this one at a time.

CRAZY
A homeowner in the US owes $400, 000 in mortgage on a house he now couldn't sell for half that amount. Some would call that the "real world". Here's a reality check: there's nothing real about it. This guy is a victim of a fake world, built on lies and false promises, because a once healthy capitalist economy devolved into what essentially became a pyramid scheme. Those left holding the bag are currently supporting the shysters (and some lucky innocents) who got out in time. What we have in place is a crazy conception of reality, where those who live off of speculation and other assorted deals consider their privileged halls of commerce to be more real than hungry mouths and real economic hardship worldwide. That's crazy - and the acceptance of it is crazy. Dissent is the ONLY sane option available.


DELINQUENT

As an addiction scholar, one who has even written on the history of addiction and its rapport with delinquency, I will let you in on a poorly guarded secret: some people are just plain addicted to money. Much like a junky who keeps wanting more and more, and at increasing doses, those addicted to money will at times do anything to feed their habit. The street drug addict, however, is typically a minor nuisance whereas the high finance money grubber is a serious menace to society. A billion dollars can't satisfy that habit. So in an effort to turn that billion into two billion, someone will destroy the earth, put children on the street, and ruin countless lives everywhere - just to maintain a habit that can never be satiated (FYI: a heroin habit can be satiated; a money habit cannot). If the money addict tries to step out of the financial game and just enjoy his money, his chances of maintaining abstinence from money-grubbing are about equal to that of a junkie or crackhead trying to kick: maybe one in twenty. While the symptoms are practically identical, there is one difference: no street addict or skid row alcoholic does as much harm as someone addicted to ridiculous amounts of money. These people are the most notorious delinquents on earth. Standing up to them is anything but a sign of delinquency. It is bloody criminal not to.


JUVENILE

People in high finance are often like children - confusing their own petty little concerns with reality as such. Think of a toddler who sees a candy, and for one moment is aware of nothing but this object of desire. Now, consider the financier quibbling over interest rates in the safety and comfort of a mansion or a yacht, convinced that this game represents the "real world" even while people maybe a few blocks away lack food and medical care. Sadly, this juvenile conception of "reality" is rampant among the 1% and even in the mainstream media. There is nothing juvenile about telling these punks to grow up already! So the grownups at Occupy are simply doing what grownups do: telling spoiled kids that the world doesn't revolve around their self-centered desires.


UNREALISTIC
Here's another reality check, a lesson in "realism" from an addiction scholar who started off as a political theorist: capitalism has been breaking down. Only a couple of years ago, we were all hit by a recession that most experts were starting to compare to the Big One we had in the 1930s. We're still struggling with all that. In the 30s, capitalism had two choices: make serious adjustments, or make way for the Bolsheviks. So adjustments - big ones involving security for the aged, assistance for the poor and the unemployed, and many other innovations - were made all over the industrialised world. In the US, they called it the New Deal, but it happened with less fanfare all over. We are now, once more, at such a crossroad. The people at Occupy are realistic enough to see that clearly, so they push for needed change.

The changes will come. Not maybe - for sure.

Oh, those juvenile, addicted and delinquent crazy people working at places like Wall Street complain about Occupy already. But when the changes are seriously implemented - when the necessary structural adjustments are not just ideas but reality - those crybaby billionaires (and wannabes) will kick and scream and throw their food all over the kitchen. They can't help it, because they're crazy.

But in the end the world will be a better place, even for money grubbers. So the crazy, delinquent, juvenile punks in high finance will be grateful.

That's right, kids, when you finally grown up you'll thank us.

 
 
 

Follow Dr. Peter Ferentzy on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PeterFerentzy

From London to Toronto, New York to Vancouver, the 'Occupiers' of capitalism are facing evictions and other challenges. Clearly, legitimate debates ensue over one's right to protest versus the rights ...
From London to Toronto, New York to Vancouver, the 'Occupiers' of capitalism are facing evictions and other challenges. Clearly, legitimate debates ensue over one's right to protest versus the rights ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:22 PM on 11/26/2011
The world has been in a race to the bottom for wages and benefits for a while now.

Big Business off shoring of production has driven down wages.

There are 2 billion people living on less than $2 a day. There will always be cheaper labor somewhere if you want to exploit the people.

There are too many people and too few jobs.
08:20 PM on 11/26/2011
There needs to be an international financial transaction tax so that the bankers that created this mess can help pay for it.
photo
Peter Ferentzy
PhD Crackhead
01:47 AM on 11/27/2011
That would be a good start.
P
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nadine Lumley
unseatHarper circle ca
07:38 PM on 11/26/2011
It’s certainly no small irony OccupyWallStreet originated in Canada.

“But I had no idea it would spread to hundreds of cities all around the place and become this possibility of a global mind shift."

https://uloadr.com/u/5z7K.jpg

☻
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nadine Lumley
unseatHarper circle ca
07:38 PM on 11/26/2011
FYI: Latin America beat #OccupyWallStreet by years….

John Perkins - The Secret History of the American Empire

http://youtu.be/7fVAifnnlg0
09:30 PM on 11/25/2011
as for the number "48%" who pay no federal income tax...one might want to take a look at this site:
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3505
09:04 PM on 11/25/2011
The Occupy movement is really historically right-wing if you use the Republican Abraham Lincoln as a measure as when he said in 1863, the great emancipator, warned that "corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow…until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed"
from corporatewelfare.org
04:03 AM on 11/25/2011
Thanks for taking the time and writing. I think it shows us all how to give more than we take.
kidding/
how socialist (commie pinko) of you.
/kidding

Whaddya think?
I think addiction (material wants, not needs) is the expression of love in the form of lust, a mutation of obsessive compulsive behavior. Addicts lust for all kinds of things. you've worked with addicts long enough to know it takes hard work and some don't survive. The cult notion of hitting bottom and the religious dogma this is based in is the same when applied to our North American socio-political-economic pysche.
The Occupy movement is a model for a parallel system of governance to help us out of these silly labels of democrat-republican-libertarian-socialism and such. Occupies are not aligned with any of them, yet they represent all of them-this is why it is "leaderless." Its nearly impossible for hard core "money is control and power" addicts to get their head around.

The mass expression of love instead of lust, is just beginning here on the planet with the Occupy movement.

Funny, how people will spread love to everyone...but when you start to speard money around...well that's a different story. Next thing you know those loving rich people will start to need a 12-step program...lol....no not the cult of aa. I would suggest a non-12-step or faith based rehab.

LOL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thenewlibertarian
Author of The Naked Truth About Drugs
06:47 PM on 11/23/2011
With all due respect, Peter, your analysis is incorrect. I've done my best to follow the Occupy movement, reading and viewing much of what they provide. And it is a very small minority that understands the true problem: crony capitalism and corrupt government. The rest, the large majority, hold views more in common with socialism. They believe our current redistribution of wealth is insufficient, demanding an ever greater share. And they take pride in the fact they're leaderless, which only means they're rudderless. Until that changes and they Occupy the true problem, their claim to represent the 99% will sound hollower by the day.
photo
Peter Ferentzy
PhD Crackhead
07:18 PM on 11/23/2011
You know, Libertarian, my sympathies are pretty libertarian as well. I see myself as more of a social justice libertarian, pushing for issues such as drug legalization, harm reduction and so on. While I don't support Laissez-faire capitalism, I am by no means a socialist. But I do favor a serious redistribution of wealth. Now the Occupiers I spoke to were mostly quite young, and with views ranging from Marxist and libertarian to feminist and Christian. Many here in Toronto favor Native causes, and pay little heed to socialist versus capitalist debates. Where all the Occupiers agree is that things have to change. Oh, and the claim to represent the 99% has more to do with opposing the 1%. I don't mind that they're leaderless. Currently they bring home the point that drastic change is needed. That's great. As for who should be responsible for implementing the change, that is a question I willing to leave open until we collectively get the point: the system really isn't working like it once did.
This comment has been removed.
08:03 PM on 11/25/2011
It would appear logical, that if you were to put the "rudderless" label into historical perspective- one could've applied it to the signatories at the bottom of the Declaration of Independence and the following revolution. The fact too remains the large majority during the American Revolution would side easily slide to support the Redcoats or the Patriots - it all depended on which side was winning and the proximity of either's Army.
Reading the above comment by newlibertarian sound very phony if one is relativity observant of history and the fact the the First American Revolution was based on the very liberal idea of redistribution of wealth and a civil duty to take the reins of power-just like the modern Occupy movement, no?

Maybe rudderless is a good thing because if we have had a rudder which steered us into global financial and arguably moral bankruptcy then i say, 'hey break that fn rudder off and make a new one which might steer us out of this "perfect storm."'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thenewlibertarian
Author of The Naked Truth About Drugs
08:32 PM on 11/25/2011
It appears my last comment has been removed - which doesn't seem fair. So no sense responding any further, except to say kc1964kc needs to more observant...