What those who are trying to regulate banking don't fully grasp, is the kind of person who tends to reach the top of finance, often has a particular attitude to money, liable to land it in trouble. This character appears endemic in certain parts of banking, which means that to fully understand why the sector appears to lurch from crisis and scandal, you really need to get inside the mind of a banker.
We believe the basic character type of Narcissism, which is frequently found in parts of banking, as in other spheres where great wealth, power or fame is at stake, could be the key character dysfunction which lies at the heart of the problem. Often those with merely very high self-esteem 'cross the line' into sub-clinical narcissism, as a result of multiple successes.
Managers and regulators need to take more account of the psychological, perhaps corrupting, impact on a psyche, of enormous rewards.
Narcissism is a grandiose sense of self-importance and entitlement. Narcissists exaggerate talents, expecting to be recognised as superior, without proportionate achievements. They're preoccupied with dreams of unlimited triumph, supremacy, genius and gorgeousness.
Convinced they are incomparable and exceptional, it follows they can only be appreciated by others similarly exalted. Not only do they require excessive respect, but they're also exploitative, taking advantage to achieve their own ends. Lacking empathy, they don't appreciate other's feelings. Instead they're dominated by envy, convinced everyone else are ever jealous of them.
Narcissism seems to develop partly from over-indulgent and over-protective parenting, developing when we're told everything we do is breathtaking, and therefore failure is inconceivable.
You may well recognise several of the above features of narcissism in many you encounter in your daily life, and this will happen increasingly, as there is evidence that narcissism is increasing which each modern generation.
Narcissism isn't confined to banking, but maybe narcissism interacts particularly badly with the temptations offered in this field, creating 'toxic' employees at a rate now not found anywhere else.
The central task at work of those that report to a narcissist is most importantly to recognise their ability, talent and specialness. But all this culture of preening and mutual admiring means decision making goes astray, as colleagues take their eye off the ball, so normal internal regulation becomes contaminated.
Research on narcissists finds they spotlight rewards and disregard risks when gambling and investing. Their tunnel vision focus on reward drives narcissists to excessive risk-taking. Being strongly motivated by reward, and weakly restrained to avoid punishment, means regulation is always going to be problematic in parts of finance. Regulators need to take more account of the particular psychology of these personality types. Psychologists would argue this is emerging as one of the key reasons for regulatory failure in the past.
Recent studies conclude that narcissists get into trouble not because they lack awareness of potential dangers associated with their high risk schemes, but rather because they find the lure of rewards irresistible. The insatiable ego of the narcissist requires constant feeding; colleagues and regulators may be caught out by this.
Narcissists become addicted to wealth because it fills their need for attention and power plus it's a vehicle for social comparison. Narcissists are in thrall with the symbolic power of money, explaining why they brag about how much they make, or do so indirectly, by flaunting expensive acquisitions.
Playing with other people's capital and no longer having a personal stake in the decision may therefore be particularly corrupting for narcissists. In the old days Wall Street partnerships had their own money tied up in their trades too, before these firms went public, and, interestingly behaviour certainly seemed different back then.
Narcissism is generally associated with career success, and the problem with trying to be vigilant for narcissism, in order to weed it out, or guard against it, is, narcissists are also charming, demonstrate leadership, assertiveness, and impression management skills, all of which help them climb the greasy pole to the top of corporations. It used to be called arrogance, and many organisations were on their guard against appointing or promoting arrogant leaders, but the goal posts may have changed and corporations are struggling to catch up with the new 'dark side' or successful personalities.
Given the rest of us face the consequences when banks collapse, it's in all our interests to pressure financial institutions into giving more thought to the personality types given such power. The previous focus has been on external regulation, so perhaps we need to now include more 'internal' regulation - where old fashioned things like a 'conscience' or 'character' regulate the self. We need to better understand the corrosive dangers on temperament of the increasing commercialisation of life.
One recent study found narcissism is significantly lower in women compared to men. But women score much higher than men in a particular area of personality difficulty - 'dependency'. Greater 'dependency' refers to difficulty making everyday decisions without excessive advice and reassurance, combined with problems expressing disagreement, out of fear of loss of support, or approval.
So one simple solution is to hire more women, by being more forgiving of feminine personality quirks, particularly given how deadly the male ones are.
But women in financial services already complain that promotion is snidely regarded as being based on gender rather than ability, so the atmosphere in banking has also to become much more female friendly.
Because male Narcissists will be brilliant at appearing to be doing a wonderful job, but in the end, they will break the bank, and your heart.
Diamond: Snapshot Of a Banking Chief
RBS CEO Hester: We can't afford to give up on banks
Fed Officials Signal Tighter Rules on Bank-Sponsored Money Funds
TEXT-Fitch: banking union could support stability
Arguments against MP-led banking inquiry come large and small
There's a fundamental link between the kinds of environments in which narcissists seem to "thrive" and short-termism.
It's plain once you realize that the single only thing a narcissist will never accept is that he (or she) should sit down and listen to why things are a little bit more complicated than "the bottom line" would seem to allow.
And as long as the "silent majority" lets this happen, narcissists will get their ways, and they will both cor- and bank- rupt us.
Of course you're right. But I'm not sure that regulators have failed to see this. They probably know that perfectly well, intuitively, i.e. not necessarily in terms of psychiatric terminology.
The problem is that few people listen. While it's not surprising that bankers don't like to hear this, what matters a lot more is that the general public doesn't want to hear this. And unfortunately, that even includes the so-called "educated" general public.
It seems pretty clear to me that what you describe is the root of several (if not all) major ills we face today. The good news may be that with the financial crisis, we have now a case at our hands that will allow us to finally see clearly what's going on.
It has always been true that narcissists create toxic environments and that the overall output suffers. And it has also always been clear that the reason this remains hidden is because narcissists tend to operate in environments of "plenty", in the sense that forgone gains, certainly those of a subtle kind, never count and the only thing that counts is the "bottom line".
I am caught in a toxic corporat environment that is causing me illness.
that if you want to arrive safely, you don’t appoint a Kamikaze pilot.
"get inside the mind of a banker"
and find out what quest they believe they’re engaged in.
"the heart of the problem."
Remember the responsibility experiment, concerning electric “shocks” given to some unseen stranger…?
"enormous rewards"
with no concomitant risks.
"we're told everything we do is breathtaking"
Albeit there are air fresheners to combat that.
"regulation is always going to be problematic in parts of finance."
Regulation is conspicuous by its absence. Some who have left this sphere, have been reporting malpractice for years. Yet the system and the apparatus to deal with it has been lacking. The entire ethos was an catastrophe, in search of an inappropriate moment to happen.
"In the old days Wall Street partnerships had their own money tied up in their trades"
In the old days Wall Street partnerships didn't misappropriate client’s segregated funds with impunity.
"the goal posts may have changed and corporations are"
supported by a safety net, unwilling supplied by the people.
"the rest of us face the consequences when banks collapse, it's in all our interests to"
separate bread and butter banks from betting banks. By all means let those who seek risk, revel in it. Maybe then, narcissists won’t have a pool to peer in.
"perhaps we need"
transparency?
"women in financial services"
Does my bung look big enough, in this company?