Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Dr Raj Persaud
 
GET UPDATES FROM Adrian Furnham
 

Pop Stars Posting Suggestive Photos on Twitter - Is Social Networking Making Narcissists of Us All?

Posted: 05/01/2013 00:00

Being lost in the wrinkles of middle age, it took a national newspaper telephoning us yesterday requesting a psychological analysis of why Rihanna has been posting suggestive images on Twitter, before we understood the celebrity story of the moment.

After apologising that we couldn't help, the feature editor's question - what do these photos and postings reveal about this celebrity's state of mind - reminded us psychologists have begun to pose this question generally about more ordinary internet users. Behavioural scientists wonder if new technology is shaping our personality, and whether sites such as Facebook, MySpace and Twitter are driving a new narcissism epidemic?

Some academics have produced research suggesting we are the most self-centred, self-obsessed generation in history, and the internet may partly be to blame.

A new study just published entitled Narcissism or Openness? College Students' Use of Facebook and Twitter, is one of a growing number of scientific attempts to answer the question of whether our tweets reveal we are all becoming diva's?

The authors of the investigation, Bruce McKinney, professor in the Department of Communication Studies at the University of North Carolina-Wilmington, Lynne Kelly, and Robert Duran, both professors in the Department of Communication at the University of Hartford, USA, were prompted to conduct the research because Twitter indeed seems a perfect tool for revealing otherwise hidden narcissism.

The belief that there is an audience interested in following one's moment-to-moment postings suggests to some psychologists, egocentrism, self-aggrandisement, and self-importance, all characteristic of the excessively narcissistic.

This new study, just published in the academic journal Communication Research Reports, surveyed 233 undergraduates and found those with significantly higher scores on narcissism also reported sending more tweets about themselves. Narcissism was unrelated to the frequency of using Facebook to post about oneself but, was related to a larger number of Facebook friends.

Since narcissists tend to alienate others over time, they may prefer the more superficial connections, not marked by emotional closeness, social networking sites can provide. Previous research confirms narcissism is related to the number of 'friends' on sites like Facebook, but not the number of true friends, in real life.

Narcissism in extreme form becomes a personality disorder characterised by a grandiose sense of self-importance, fantasies of unlimited power, conceit and superficial relationships.

Jean Twenge, a professor of psychology at San Diego State Univeristy, and Keith Campbell, professor of psychology at the University of Georgia, authored a new book entitled The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement, arguing we are in the grip of a new narcissism pandemic escalating over the past two decades.

Studying more than 16,000 college students, Twenge and Campbell found that today's youth score substantially higher on narcissism than those of their age just 20 years ago. Two-thirds of recent college students scored above the average in narcissism, compared to half of the college students who took the same test in the late Seventies and early Eighties.

If narcissism is increasing, this is ominous for the mental health of future generations. It's associated with a strong sense of entitlement, which leads to unhappiness, through a sense of deprivation. Narcissists can't have proper deeper relationships because they merely seek to exploit others for their own ends - friends and lovers are always stepping stones to something better.

If it feels we live in angrier times then this may be linked to narcissism being associated with responding aggressively to insults, and slights, while it's also associated with vengeance seeking. Incidentally in the light of recent pop star photos, this might explain the use of Twitter as the battle ground for so many celebrity feuds.

Another recent investigation entitled 'The effect of social networking websites on positive self-views: An experimental investigation' found use of MySpace was linked to narcissism but not Facebook. The study published in the journal Computers in Human Behavior found spending just about half an hour editing one's MySpace page, and writing about it's meaning, was enough to significantly raise narcissism, suggesting that social networking sites may have profound impact on the development of personality and identity.

Yet those who spent time editing and thinking about their Facebook page reported higher levels of self-esteem, but not elevated levels of narcissism.

The authors of the research, Brittany Gentile, Jean Twenge, Elise Freeman and Keith Campbell argue the contrasting results, in terms of impact on narcissism between Facebook and MySpace, may be due to key differences between the sites.

MySpace, Brittany Gentile and colleagues contend, offers the opportunity for users to create a personal brand, customizing profiles using stylisation code, in contrast to the standard format used on Facebook. MySpace users also have the option to share more profile information publicly. Thus, MySpace may offer greater opportunities for self-expression and self-promotion than Facebook.

In addition, the authors argue, MySpace offers the potential for fame. Celebrities have been born out of the strength of their following (e.g., Tila Tequila, Jeffree Star) or unearthing their flair on MySpace (e.g., Colbie Caillat, Lily Allen). In contrast, Facebook markets itself by appealing to the more mundane project of keeping in touch with friends and family.

McKinney, Kelly, and Duran conclude from their study that it is not the technology that creates narcissism, as much as it is the narcissistic personality that seeks technologies allowing the user to become the centre of attention.

The authors also wonder whether social networking sites, in fostering a new culture of personal disclosure, might be positive psychologically in the longer run. Given the stigma and shame around mental health issues, for example, it remains to be seen whether the 'new openess' will improve our mental health, as there may be less shame and taboo in sharing what previous generations have regarded as private.

What these studies suggests is the way you use social media unerringly reveals your personality. So if you are aware of this latest psychological research, in fact you now possess greater tools and opportunities to get inside the mind of friends, colleagues, lovers, break-ups and adversaries, than ever before.

 
FOLLOW UK TECH
Being lost in the wrinkles of middle age, it took a national newspaper telephoning us yesterday requesting a psychological analysis of why Rihanna has been posting suggestive images on Twitter, before...
Being lost in the wrinkles of middle age, it took a national newspaper telephoning us yesterday requesting a psychological analysis of why Rihanna has been posting suggestive images on Twitter, before...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carol Hoousendove
08:31 PM on 01/10/2013
Its called social packaging sometimes when you open the box the weave falls off the head. Marks where you had surgery on under arms and belly. The boobs start to sag you need a new set. This is why you see all pictures before the sag sets in. (NARCISSISM)
09:48 PM on 01/05/2013
I cannot understand the need to post thousands of pictures of yourself accompanied by banal comments such as "macaroni for tea" on social networking sites,Its just beyond my comprehension. The youth of today are definately self obsessed and where will it all lead? Get out, meet friends face to face,mix with all sorts of people and take an interest in whats going on in the real world,surely thats much healthier than posing into a camera and showing everyone how many stupid faces you can pull! The theory of social networking is good but its gone off in the wrong direction.
photo
Reith
what's a micro-bio?
06:21 PM on 01/05/2013
Point is, does it matter? Narcissus and his ilk have been around since 8AD and not even Nemesis placated him so...was the study worth the money?

I’ve never liked psychologists - psychology is a pseudo science if ever there was one. As soon as someone shifts so much as half a whisker off the normal (ie the peak of the bell curve) they’ve got a personality disorder. That’s all psychologists do, sit around inventing new disorders. It gives them more chances to pontificate and write books.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dr Raj Persaud
01:09 PM on 01/06/2013
Many thanks for your comment. The original study by McKinney, Kelly and Duran entitled 'Narcissism or Openness?: College Students’ Use of Facebook and Twitter' is published in the peer-reviewed academic journal 'Communication Research Reports' (29:2, 108-118) http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08824096.2012.666919.
233 students were administered Personality Tests, measures of internet usage and an 'Attitude Toward Openness Scale'. The investigation by Gentile and colleagues published in the academic peer-reviewed journal 'Computers in Human Behavior' (28, 2012 1929–1933) http://www.sciencedirect.com/. 79 undergraduates made edits to their MySpace page for 15 min and then completed questionnaires. 72 different undergraduates who had a Facebook page did the same. Participants in the 'control' condition of the experiment spent the same time period interacting with Google Maps. They then completed questionnaires mimicking the experimental, 'Facebook' or 'MySpace' condition. All completed 40 items of a well-validated personality test - the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. The methodology of these two experiments, including their sample size and statistical analysis, resemble very closely studies to be found in medical academic journals. Is one possible consequence of describing all of psychology as a 'pseudo-science' that those with real problems, such as serious clinical depression, which has a significant suicide rate, continue to be denied treatment from effective psychologists using scientifically validated treatments, because, the Government can under-fund NHS psychiatric treatment, supported by the view the professionals involved remain 'pseudo-scientists', unlike 'proper doctors'?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dr Raj Persaud
06:02 PM on 01/06/2013
Many thanks for your comment. 'Narcissism or Openness?: College Students’ Use of Facebook and Twitter' is published in the peer-reviewed academic journal 'Communication Research Reports' (29:2, 108-118) http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08824096.2012.666919.
233 students at two US Universities were administered Personality Tests, measures of internet usage and an 'Attitude Toward Openness' Scale. Gentile and colleagues' paper is published in the academic peer-reviewed journal 'Computers in Human Behavior' (28, 2012 1929–1933) available to be viewed here http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2336911. 79 undergraduates from a US University made edits to their MySpace page for 15 min and then completed a questionnaire. 72 different undergraduates with a Facebook page did the same. Participants in the 'control' condition of the experiment interacted with Google Maps. They then completed questionnaires mimicking the experimental, 'Facebook' or 'MySpace' condition. All completed 40 items of a well-validated personality test - the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. The methodology of these two experiments, including sample size and statistical analysis, resemble very closely any study found in medical journals. Is it possible a consequence of describing psychology as a 'pseudo-science' is those with real problems, such as serious clinical depression, which has a significant suicide rate, continue to be denied treatment from effective psychologists using scientifically validated treatments, because, the Government can under-fund NHS psychiatric treatment, possibly hiding under the view that the professionals involved remain 'pseudo-scientists', unlike 'proper doctors'?
photo
Reith
what's a micro-bio?
02:03 PM on 01/05/2013
"attempts to answer the question of whether our tweets reveal we are all becoming diva's?"


Did you mean "divas", or becoming the property of/belonging to a diva
01:39 PM on 01/05/2013
Social media has definitely given a platform to people who have any form of attention seeking and/or narcissistic personality disorders, not only that but it's desensitised us to the loss of privacy and respect for others privacy that we had before they became so prevalent.

Friendships can now become more transient as you don't really need to make an effort to stay in touch with people like you used to have to. So for example, people you don't really like but feel may be useful to you, you no longer have to spend time cultivating a friendship, you just 'friend', 'follow' etc and occasionally post to them.

I don't think it makes us narcissistic though, although the narcissists are more visible, I think it's just making us a bit more lazy as far as commitment to relationships is concerned.
11:51 AM on 01/05/2013
I suggest technology merely facilitates the rapid dissemination of the uttering of those who are narcissistic. But this is not new and it is not as dangerous to a society than the more malevolent narcissism that is inherent in our system of monarchy and nobility. As a society we literally brainwash our children into believing they are lesser beings than these manipulative people. We even talk about them dying for King or Queen. What could be more evil. Compared to that, people like Rihanna are just slightly giddy little sweethearts.
11:27 AM on 01/05/2013
Having read this article about narcissism and social media, I'm no more curious, nor am I convinced about the legitimacy of the points it was attempting to make. I am a social networker who keeps in touch with friends, family, but mostly I am promoting my literary works and networking with other authors and artists who are doing, pretty much, the same. I do, however, notice many people who are constantly posting pictures of themselves, and some have quite a few of only themselves. It is my opinion that there are people with esteem issues, others whom are lonely, and some who are just flat out vain.

What tickled me about this article is how the writer tried to, weakly, define the differences between Facebook and My Space. Being that I still have an active My Space account, I cruised over to see if I could get a feel of what this writer was trying to convey. Well, all I discovered was that, My Space, is still just as cumbersome as it was when I used it. About the only thing I like about My Space is it's music platform. I created a library of music that I love but, outside of that, I found it to be the relic it turned into once Facebook burst onto the scene
From one writer to another, I have nothing but respect for your article. ~GD
11:55 AM on 01/05/2013
You are being a little harsh on ordinary people who post lots of photos of themselves on thier sites. As an author you yourself know that many, if not most, in the world of arts and culture are enormously more conceited and narcissistic than any ordinary person could be. And the truth is that one single decent plumber or electrician is worth more to society than a dozen average artists or writers.