The old saying is 'Doctor knows best'. But times are changing and we're slowly moving into an era where the appointment room is a place for a two-way discussion and use of knowledge from both sides. No longer do doctors use a 'one size fits all' approach and informed patients are willing to ask more questions than ever before...well, that's the idea. But it seems it isn't quite yet the reality.
Think back to your last doctor's appointment. Did you ask any burning questions that you had during the consultation? Did you express any concerns that sprung to mind? Had you researched your symptoms beforehand and thought it may have been something different to what your doctor said, yet you felt obliged to remain quiet? If so, you're certainly not alone. According to new research from Bupa Health Pulse 2012, Britons are more likely than other nationalities to hold back from challenging their doctor or medical professional because they 'don't feel comfortable' questioning them.
Bupa's annual, international Health Pulse survey looks at people's attitudes towards their health and healthcare across 13 countries around the world. Because shared decision making is in the process of becoming part of mainstream clinical practice, this year, we explored how people are engaging with medical professionals and accessing health information and services, with the hope of identifying barriers to allowing patients to become more engaged in managing their own healthcare.
Of note, the international survey revealed that people in Egypt and Saudi Arabia feel most confident questioning their doctor, with 75% of people willing to do so. This compared to just 53% of Brits willing to challenge or question their doctor about health matters.
The reserve that this survey has exposed surrounding those in need of healthcare is a worrying one. Whether it's in Britain or elsewhere, a percentage of patients are genuinely limiting their choices and access to appropriate treatment and care because they simply don't feel comfortable to challenge their doctor about advice or treatment options.
The world has changed rapidly, and with ever increasing access to information, the average patient of today will have more knowledge than in previous generations. Being comfortable about asking for more details about a condition, a test or treatment is invaluable - not only does it involve you in decisions about your healthcare, but there is evidence to suggest that if you actively take part in managing your health and care, you will have better outcomes than people who don't. And better health outcomes result in both higher patient satisfaction and reduced use of health services.
The same survey also revealed that it's people who feel least positive about their health and those who admit to having a poor diet who engage the least with their doctor - an expected but troublesome trend. This is most likely due to a lack of confidence, lower levels of education, or a lower socio-economic bracket, and it's here where doctors have an obligation to play a part by prompting questions and encouraging discussion.
By necessity, doctors appointments are often short - the average in the UK is somewhere between seven and 10 minutes. All the more reason for patients to be prepared for their appointment, and to feel empowered and able to ask questions within that time. Patient-doctor time is precious, so being able to discuss alternative treatments, or to fully understand the risks and benefits of a procedure, will only be possible if there is an active conversation from both sides. This is still a challenge for many people, including doctors, and much work is still needed to embed shared decision making into health systems. The new mantra in healthcare should certainly be 'no decision about me, without me'.
This lack of confidence with doctors may also be fuelling a rise in the amount of people using the internet to research symptoms, address concerns and discover remedies. In 2010, Bupa Health Pulse survey found that 73% of people in Britain used the internet to search for advice about their health and medical conditions - this has now risen to 82% (2012), which isn't really surprising considering the resources, ease and anonymity of the internet.
Although there's a lot of trusted information out there, and doing some background research yourself can help you make better decisions about your healthcare, the internet should never replace your doctor. The healthcare cyber space can be inaccurate, misleading and even frightening if you don't use the right sources - in fact, our survey revealed only half of those using the internet for health purposes said that they always check the source of the information to ensure it's credible.
Remember, a doctor's advice, or personal communication with a health professional, is incredibly valuable. Don't be afraid to challenge your doctor or to ask questions, and always say if you don't understand something that you're told. To get the most out of your appointment, it pays to do some preparation beforehand and to think about the questions you want to ask. The health consumer (or patient if you like) should always have the right to choose treatments and healthcare that suits their lifestyle, preferences and beliefs. Being informed, confident and engaged in what medical treatment you're undergoing will, in both the short and long term, lead to better outcomes.
Follow Dr Sneh Khemka on Twitter: www.twitter.com/drsneh
Rachel Carrell: Why Skype is Not the Answer for the NHS (But the Internet Might Be)
What the European Meddlers Agency - sorry, I meant Medicine - don't realise is that what we call alternative medicine is THE medicine for about 2/3 of the world.
I was utterly annoyed to find that a herbal remedy I've used for a long time whenever a cold or some local viral ailment threatens, has been banned in our herbal suppliers until the producers go through a horribly expensive process to have it licensed, damn the EMA. It works. As an anti-viral, anti-bacterial blend it's perfectly efficacious (for me at least) and avoids the need for antibiotics inter alia.
Anyone with even a small interest in phytotherapy/herbal medicine will have an understanding of how these medicines act, when they can act (as obviously they are little use in crisis medicine for which the orthodoxy is supreme) and rules over their use (because they ARE medicines).
It's pretty obvious that the EMA has been sat on by the drug giants who, in these post-golden-age days are desperate to claw back profits and do not want people administering their own medicines.
The golden age for me means the 1900-1980s when drugs for all the easy medical solutions were created by the pharmaceutical outfits.
I said beg your pardon that is the reason I came in. I requested a treatment but was not given it as she said you will have to go somewhere else for that.
Later with another doctor at the same practise I requested a different thyroid med which they use in USA and is approved by nice here... no we do not give that out. I stay firmly away now if I am ill or not. Also, now the asthma nurse is no longer a qualified nurse but a 'care assistant' on minimum wage. My God talk about crap service what service?
The treatment I get now is sparse enough I don't want it to get any more scarce, thanks.
Positive-spin articles like this are mighty interesting but have absolutely no validity for many people living in britain today who cannot afford private medical care.
l think some surgeries have that rule and some don`t, and equally l think that in the surgeries that do some doctors will stick to it and some won`t!
Unfortunately this has given many doctors the view that they should be deified - our lives are in their hands - and sometimes they are. These doctors talk down. They don't listen - they have their bag of remedies and will bend a patient's problems to suit someting in this bag. So patients are intimidated.
At worst if you challenge some doctors they will withhold what the patient KNOWS is a better treatment.
Our local practice has both. A cross between a griffin and a drill sargeant in disguise as a woman (who insisted on treating my insomnia with a vast dose of Amitriptyline that acted as a chemical cosh); and one or two others who are empathetic and actually DISCUSS with their patients. (Unsurprisingly they're the ones that everyone wants to consult!)
Doctors have to be encouraged to be more human, more mortal, more empathetic. And, yes, they have 10 minutes slots but stop regarding the throughput of patients as a nuisance conveyor belt that has to be got through.
I've met an NHS consultant who, you'd think, regards God as his deputy.
They will also do far too many tests to cover themselves, because they know insurance coverage (ie. the patient) will pick up the cost. This is particularly prevalent with older people covered by Medicare, because the government is picking up the tab.
As for your adverse reaction, doctors are SUPPOSED to register this on a " yellow card" as far as l remember, it then gets reported to an organisation, sorry l can`t remember the name of it, maybe you can get more info online.
l am well aware they do make mistakes and there have been many, many articles on that, on HP and other blogs, so l make sure l get the best from both my gp or hospital doctors when needed, by being both friendly, polite but communicative and open too, and assertive when necessary, though never aggressive, that is a definite no, no.
Unfortunately, many people feel somehow " beneath" their doctor,it seems to be a " class" thing, l read once on the bbc eye that doctors relate better to middle class patients because that is the background that they themselves come from, but that is a terrible reflection of both our society and the medical profession in particular, and very sad too that medical students are nowadays being offered classes in COMMUNICATION , something they should have been learning from their families, very bad. and unfortunately we have our fair share of arrogant doctors, mostly male l have found. l had one like that once, but because my practice is a group practice l just made sure l never went with him again so that worked well.