An out of control dog can have potentially fatal consequences, so dog aggression is a serious issue that nobody can ignore. But what is really causing this problem and, perhaps more importantly, what can be done to solve the issue?
Firstly, let's get some cold, hard facts. PDSA's Animal Wellbeing Report (PAW Report) found that over 1 million dogs display aggressive behaviour, such as growling, snarling and biting, towards people and other pets on a weekly basis. The number of injuries sustained by people due to dog attacks has risen from just under 3,000 in 1997 to over 6,100 in 2010 - more than double.
National data also suggests that there is an increase in violent dogs on the street, with the number of people sentenced for dangerous dog offences increasing to over 1,000 cases in 2010. Vets see these problems on a daily basis - I don't know a single vet that hasn't experienced some kind of attack or aggressive behaviour from a dog, and I myself have been seriously bitten twice and felt under attack more times than I care to remember.
To understand what is causing these worrying increases, we need to understand what the underlying causes of aggressive behaviour are. I believe that in the vast majority of cases, behavioural problems are due to a lack of training and little or no socialisation.
Socialisation is the process of getting pets used everyday sights and sounds when young. This is incredibly important, as fear of the unusual can often result in aggressive behaviour in later life. Yet the PDSA PAW Report found that a quarter of all owners who had their dogs from puppies didn't adequately socialise them, and 44% of owners don't know whether their dog was socialised or not.
Kind and effective training is also essential to help puppies learn what sort of behaviour is appropriate, yet half of all dogs never went to training classes during their first six months of life.
So what can be done about this? The government is currently discussing various potential changes in legislation aimed at addressing some of the issues relating to dog aggression, such as compulsory microchipping, which PDSA supports. There are also proposed changes to the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 and one of my responsibilities at PDSA is to provide professional feedback for these debates.
But I think that in order to see real change it's also important to tackle the root causes. Work needs to be done to ensure that all owners, and all breeders for that matter, fully understand their responsibilities. The vast majority of dog owners that I know are very responsible and caring, but some simply don't fully understand how to properly train their dog, or the importance of socialisation.
PDSA's view is that much of the solution lies in education and ensuring that new and existing dog owners fully understand the needs of their pet and how to properly meet them. .
For new owners this education should start prior to even purchasing a puppy, and initiatives such as PDSA's Your Right Pet website, and the new Puppy Information Pack, will hopefully go some way to helping prospective owners fully understand the responsibilities of ownership.
Anyone with a young dog should, without exception, make a commitment to socialising and training their pet using effective and kind methods. It is up to owners to make sure that they provide appropriate early experiences for their young dog so that their pet grows up to be friendly and outgoing. The Association of Pet Dog Trainers can help you find an accredited trainer in your area that uses reward-based methods.
Any owner that is concerned about their pet's behaviour should seek professional advice immediately. The first port of call should be their vet, who will check for any underlying medical causes that can sometimes result in aggression or behavioural change. If a clean bill of health is given, then your vet may refer your pet to a behaviour specialist who will look for the underlying cause of the pet's behaviour. The Association of Pet Behaviour Counsellors can help to put owners in touch with professional help in their area.
The hard fact to remember is that owners are ultimately responsible for ensuring their pets remain under control. Spending time properly training and socialising your dog and keeping it under proper control to prevent any risk of your pet permanently injuring or even killing a person or another pet is vital.
Violet Donohoe: Compulsory Microchipping: Don't Pop the Corks Just Yet...
Rachel Cunningham: Why the Fight Goes on to Get it Right on Dangerous Dogs
Adrian Ramsay: Why Dog Breeding Laws Must Be Changed
Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dangerous Dog Breeds - What Dogs Are Most Likely to Attack or Bite?
'Staffies' run loose on one estate in my town, frequently pursued by the police. They invariably respond well to my attentions, and whereas I dislike this kind of dog, I have a soft spot for them. They have become every other dog, I would like to think that I have learnt something of behaviour from them, like delinquent people, some dogs are damaged as well. I hope I nor anybody else doesn't one day make a mistake. Best wishes.
Training clubs can help owners to start their dogs training and even help with difficult dogs for, usually, quite a reasonable fee. Anyone who wants to find a club in their area can find a registered club via the Kennel Club website very easily.
Microchipping is great if the registration is kept up by successive owners but as cars still change hands without being reregistered, although they should be by law, how do we enforce the reregistration of dogs? I wish I knew. Horses are now all suposed to be issued with a passport soon after birth and it is illegal to buy or sell one without. But it still happens very often. So how are we going to solve this dog problem?
She can reliably be let off the lead in open spaces, and will walk to heal until told she can run ahead. Nonetheless her patience is regularly tested by small, yappy dogs, and often the owner is a hundred yards away or completely out of sight. I am amazed at how slack the owners of smaller dogs can be, simply because they think their dog is no threat to anyone. If my dog wasn't so well behaved, it would end badly for the yappers. We can all guess who the other owner would blame if that happened.
I see them on a daily basis, he is wearing jogging bottoms, with a can of beer in one hand and a cigarette in the other, she is blond and pregnant and they are walking with a completely untrained Staffie. All dogs need firm and kindly guidance, but these owners have no social skills themselves, so how could they be expected to train a dog. The Staffie is also a fair sized dog and is very muscular and all these factors lead to the Staffie getting a bad name.
That sums up what I have said about Basset Hounds.
My breed was well known for being a bit lazy, docile and perhaps even dopey, but out of 20 litters I had to have two dogs put down for being aggressive and uncontrollable! Something that Veterinary Surgeons are reluctant to do!
Some owners choose dogs that are aggressive by nature, in the misguided belief that they will somehow deter thieves and protect their property, actually most of those dogs would just run off and become a danger to the public at large!
Unfortunately there is an assumption that all dog owners are responsible people, and that is not necessarily the case. Often puppies are bought at the behest of children and then interest is lost once the dog grows into an adult!
You are much more likely to be attacked by a feral, out of control adolescent/young adult than a dog - and the injuries are likely to be a lot worse.