David Icke famously said after he first spoke out nearly 25 years ago out he couldn't fill a phone box. This weekend he spoke to a sold out Wembley Arena for nine hours. Which begs the question, what went right?
Let's get that 'R' word out of the way first, shall we? Any discussion on Icke will inevitably prompt those reptilians to rear their scaly heads. That's understandable and a reason he's been a ridicule magnet for so many years. I am not going to defend every intricacy of every claim Icke makes. That would take forever. Moreover, get to the heart of why, much to the chagrin and derision of many, he only continues to rise in popularity.
In 1991, post-Wogangate, Icke was laughed out of town but rather than sink in sea of humiliation and shame the former sports journalist got back on his horse. For those whose knowledge of him begins and ends at 'shapeshifting lizards' he has spent the last three decades as a full time researcher travelling to and speaking in over 55 countries. To date he's published 14 books. He calls himself a 'dot connector' and seeks to get to the underbelly of what makes our world tick behind the big curtain.
So. In terms of his increasing audience and outreach, is he just a very canny snake (or reptile?) oil salesman whose bizarre offerings naive, crazy people willingly lap up? Or does - perish the thought - Mr Icke actually talk, you know, some sense about things and people are recognising that?
It seems the latter could very well be the case given much of what Icke has talked about for years continues to manifest as truth; he predicted the financial crash of 2008, the increase of natural disasters after the millennium and has been saying for years that Jimmy Savile was a predatory paedophile. Yet, of course, endured endless flack for it. Icke is being proven right again and again so maybe it's no wonder his audience only continues to grow.
One only has to throw a cursory glance around at society - governments lie, our media illegally hack into phones; establishment corruption is rife. As a global populace we are rightly becoming more jaded and disenfranchised with those who supposedly serve us and from whom we seek information about the wider world. Corporate media is plummeting and independent media flourishing. Given the increase of personal epiphanies and snowballing distrust of reining authority, that Icke's work (and the work of many of his researcher peers) resonates with so many is no surprise.
I was one of the many who scoffed and laughed at David Icke's early theories. Daft man. Wacky ideas. Consign him to the loony bin.
Then I began to investigate his recent work. Then investigated what his work investigates. Radical it seems at first, but the further down the rabbit hole you go, the quicker your overcome your cognitive dissonance, the more you independently study what Icke picks apart and analyses (the economy, religion, politics, human history) you realise that, bloody hell, perhaps this man could have a point. Many, in fact.
Is he eccentric? No doubt. Is he right about everything? Possibly not, however Saturday's Wembley Arena event was a serious indicator that after decades of being a soft target and the butt of endless jokes, his research and ideas are being taken seriously and for one 'nut job, deluded conspiracy theorist' that's a lot of people to have hoodwinked.
Follow Ellen Grace Jones on Twitter: www.twitter.com/EllenGraceJones
Andrea Mann: The Loneliness of the Long, Distant Goalkeeper
Tim Clare: Three Ways to Jazz Up The Queen's Christmas Message
Kate Harrad: Putting gullible back in the dictionary
for the 911 believers ask the following;
Why was all the crime scene evidence of the steel shipped out to a Chinese scrap metal merchant immediately?
Why were the reports of bombs going off before the planes hit, in the basement ignored by the reports
Why were there no videos of the impossible maneuver ("not a chance" by Boeing) of a 757 hitting the Pentagon? even though it was the worst crime against the most secure building in the country? What happened to the seven cameras that cover the accounts and budget section that was hit? Where did the plane go? Into the 20' hole? Then why were the upper windows still intact for over 30 minutes even though the tail is over 40' high? And they were hit by an 'airliner' traveling at over 600 mph?
Why were the non-existent crime scene evidence plane parts 'handed back to United'? to clean up and reuse? The Lockerbie 747 was still with the AAIB till 3 years ago? There is so much evidence of lies it is overwhelming.
Interesting article here -
http://franticplanet.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/my-greatest-fear/
As I've repeatedly stated, this article was NOT to support every claim he makes but to explore WHY he's only expanding in popularity. My argument was rational, balanced and fair. Why you are going to such lengths to insult, discredit and cast aspirations about the mental health of a man who (whether you like it or not) is opening many people's eyes to hidden corruption, systemic child abuse and other issues we should ignore at our peril, I don't know.
As for the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Icke is NOT an anti-semite. There is a difference between 'Rothschild Zionism' as he calls it and the Jewish people. Icke constantly praises Jews who do not support the Zionists treatment of Palestine. Was he was wrong to think they were genuine scriptures? Yes. Can we, however, deny much of their contents are unfolding before our very eyes? No.
Dislike him by all means but the evidence speaks for itself: Icke has been bang on the money too many times to laugh at anymore.
I see the self-awareness classes are going well.
Still there is a big question : if people "wake up", and conspiracy theories finally end up to be true, how will we know it is not a trap?
Following David Ickes’s philosophy in no way should be interpreted as "worshipping David Icke.” So when David Icke gets "his" belief system wrong it doesn't spoil ANY of what his philosophy has to offer.
His philosophy is to look at EVERY piece of information available. His philosophy is also to welcome ALL conversations on ANY subject. His philosophy is to have an open heart and open mind to all possibilities of reality.
I know by reading his work of Compiled Information that he doesn't want me to "believe" what he "believes". He just wants me to see what he has seen and make my own decision about my own flowing belief system. Period. "They" require dogma and rigid belief systems to control the many with inhumane tactics and systems of power.
I will forever be grateful to David Icke and the many other “compilers of information.” Thank you for putting these ideas in front of me and letting me make my own decision on the reality I find myself.
Join me in the search, by letting go of dogma and opening up to new possibilities of reality. Love.
I laughed about his opinions until i actually listened to him speak. If you want to inform yourself , check out his speech to the Oxford union. You may be surprised.
May i suggest you read David Talbot's "The Holographic Universe" .....the journey begins with the
work of David Bohm,an eminent quantum physicist and Karl Pribam a pinoeer in neuroscience.
David T. then goes on to provide multitude of sources,many from Science and Medicine....deals
with many holographic signature subjects from multiple personality disorder to Mirin Dajo.
Once you see that the Universe and everything in it is indeed a hologram then quite frankly
David's theories on the Reptiles and such may be just the pinhead of all possibilities............
"Only a few weeks ago the Guardian reported Stanford University researchers confirming consuming young blood reverses aging. Hmmm..!!"
What on earth are you suggesting this proves?
refer as well.They will tell you that the maximum information held in any 3 dimensional
volume of space is the sum of the 2 dimensional surface area as in the event horizon of
a black hole.That is a Holographic signature...The Fractal nature of everything in this
Universe is also a Holographic signature....
Of course you could suggest that nobody reads anything to enlighten themselves
apart from what you read which keeps you in your little box of beliefs and comfort
blanket.
Come on people, wake up and smell the coffee. The World is not like what they told you. Please do some independent research without "checking the credibility of the sources" because the only "credible" sources according to mainstream thought is CNN, BBC etc. This isn't going to be a simple or easy task but you must seriously rethink your definition of credible. People like Alex Jones, Icke, Mark Passio and others are trying to help you/us to wake up. I suggest anyone reading this comment should go and do some actual research on this themselves and check the validity of conspiracy theories for yourselves.
Instead of shooting the messenger(s), it would be a better idea to shoot the message instead.
Icke a complete opportunist - his whole schtick is completely borrowed from other conspiracy theorists and his "Moon matrix theory" is just laughable.
To posit his work is 'completely borrowed from other conspiracy theorists' is lazy, wrong and suggests you know little about it. Have you actually been to one of his talks? His work is often backed by (yes! ) mainstream physics/ science.
Accelerated globalisation, encroaching police state, stealth-like centralisation of power, the crony banking system - things Icke has talked about for years are happening NOW. But why bother with this when it's easy to poke fun at his 'reptiles / moon theories' which only encompass about 1% of his work?
The MSM make it easy to dismiss those with even a little curiosity that perhaps our world doesn't operate how we're programmed (by them and governing bodies) into believing. It's healthy to question things, seeking answers elsewhere. Anyone who expresses even a modicum of interest in Icke or other alternative researchers work is instantly tarred a 'conspiracy theorist loony'. Utter nonsense. Those I know who explore his work are critical thinkers capable of independent thought who know that society's staring global, financial and social enslavement in the face and needs to wake up.
This is pretty much how you describe yourself in your own profile?
If one criticises the inquisition does that equate to anti - catholicism ......?
The persecution of Catholics equals anti - protestantism.....?
Must dissatisfaction with the oppression of Palestine be construed as anti semitism ?
Personally i'm sick of people hiding behind religion to excuse their abhorrent behaviour.