THE BLOG

Are We Witnessing a Replay of 1992?

02/02/2015 11:51 GMT | Updated 02/04/2015 10:59 BST

Whenever a general election is in sight, party strategists waste no time in analyzing how best to threaten the competition. Often, such maestros will flock to the political archives, tracing the tracks of past elections in the search for a tactic that will lead their party to victory. With less than 100 days to go before Britain heads to the polls, the consensus around Westminster is that we could be in the early stages of witnessing an action replay of 1992, an election that saw Labour's Neil Kinnock unexpectedly concede defeat to John Major.

Back in '92, Major was not expecting to win. 'It's The Sun wot won it,' many claimed, though the paper has yet to decide who they are backing for May 2015. Back then, the odds were in favour of Kinnock who, leading a party that had been in power for 13 years, appeared to be ahead in the opinion polls. However, behind the scenes, unnoticed until the election's outcome, Tory schemers were changing the stakes by promoting the idea that Labour would ruin the economy, causing greater unemployment in a society that was witnessing a rapid rise in interest rates, and so it was therefore only the Conservatives who could be trusted to get Britain back on track. Sound familiar? Despite having exhausted the term 'long term economic plan', there is no hope that we will be hearing less of this from the Tories over the next three months. They will not let you forget the 'mess that Labour left us', unless, of course, Labour choose to challenge that...

Another '92 flashback reappeared this week following Labour's announcements on NHS reform, prompting Alan Milburn, Tony Blair's former health secretary, to comment to the BBC that Ed Miliband was making a "fatal mistake" which he viewed as a "pale imitation" of Kinnock's fate in '92. In the Commons this week David Cameron accused Miliband of seeking to "weaponise" the NHS for political gain, challenging the Labour leader on his motives. In addition to Milburn, Lord Hutton, another New Labour man, also stressed that Labour had to avoid a re-run of 1992: "Labour has got to talk about the economy and have a message about what it will do to keep the economy moving ahead".

Whenever a party leader begins to appear vulnerable with support dwindling from within their own party ranks, past figures are often quick to leap to their defense. Lord Kinnock, rarely seen in the media these days, this week tried to put an end to the "sniping from behind" that was going on within Labour, stressing to activists,"we've got to get our party back". The gossiping amongst Blairites had become a "distraction", Kinnock said, highlighting that Labour cannot go into an election campaign looking divided. He's right. They can't. But is peer support enough to change public consensus with barely three months of campaigning left to go?

The Conservatives have recognised that by portraying the Labour Party as chaotic and with an economic plan that cannot be trusted, they could find themselves back in government. And if there are two areas that cause the most public concern, it is the economy and the NHS, both of which are currently working to their advantage. The question is, do the majority buy the Tory talk that Britain would sink further into deeper financial trouble under the leadership of Miliband? The answer will be revealed on May 7th.