Today's strikes have been a long time coming and trade unions have had ample opportunity to call them off, but a small number of hardliners are determined to cause disruption to millions of people.
Union leaders have called out their members on strike with between a quarter and a third of them actually voting in favour of industrial action.
Worse still, they are striking over reforms that, even if they go ahead, leave public sector workers with pensions far more generous than can be expected by most private sector workers - the people who will pick up the bill.
Big public sector unions like Unite and Unison would like you to believe that this mass downing of tools is about solidarity and standing shoulder to shoulder against the big mean government who want to work them all into an early grave; it isn't. The strikes are a hugely disproportionate over-reaction to what are moderate and reasonable reforms to make public sector pensions more affordable.
The coalition's most recent pensions offer was incredibly generous compared to what most taxpayers working in the private sector can afford to save for their own retirement. That is completely unfair given that those private sector workers earn less as well. Union leaders are dreaming if they think that they can get a better deal that will last. These strikes will see deficit-denying union dinosaurs, who refuse to accept the painful truth about public sector pensions, leading thousands of public sector employees out onto the streets, needlessly losing a day's earnings, despite the fact that negotiations are still ongoing.
The concessions the unions want, combined with an ageing population and no increase in the retirement age, would lead to an army of retirees drawing public sector pensions from an ever-diminishing pool of money. Change has to happen at some point; otherwise we will simply end up in a position that both unions and the government would find equally undesirable: that of having promised pensions that we can no longer afford to pay.
We cannot kick the can down the road any longer. It's time for reform. Do not underestimate the scale of the problem that is already facing unfunded public sector pensions. Our recent research shows that, excluding the NHS, there are more public sector workers drawing a pension than there are working and paying in.
Over at Unison's website the front page shows a woman holding a sign declaring "I'm taking action" with the tagline "fighting for decent pensions". But what is it that these nurses, bin men and dinner ladies are taking action against? They are acting against the interests of taxpayers now and in the future, asking the next generation to promise to pay for expensive retirement arrangements. And they're doing it with a healthy wedge of taxpayers' money in the union warchest.
As our Trade Union Rich List revealed, union leaders like Dave Prentis have pay and benefits running into six figures that no doubt mean a prosperous retirement is secure. We can't let them line up a financial disaster for the rest of us.
Follow Emma Boon on Twitter: www.twitter.com/emmaboon
"But what is it that these nurses, bin men and dinner ladies are taking action against? They are acting against the interests of taxpayers now and in the future, asking the next generation to promise to pay for expensive retirement arrangements"
So we are acting against ourselves?!? We are the taxpayer, Get a grip. We are fighting for our and the next generations future.
"that of having promised pensions that we can no longer afford to pay."
Yet our countries war budget carries on becoming bloated and a heavier burden than our pensions.
Find it hard to be objective do we? I despair sometimes I really do
on the bones of others suffering in this finanial crisis.a crisis brought on by greedy bankers, people like you and wealthy politicians who have no intention of enforceing bankers to curb the money grabbing.
That apart the he ha Henry Cameron missed the point. For every one of those on strike is one less vote at an election and that is only a known fraction of the people who will vote against the tory clan.
i might say that [not]:
Another I'm-alright-Jack Tory we could do without. Go away, Taxpayers' Alliance: there are human beings who care for one another in this country. Your selfishness is not welcome.
David Cameron and pals' pension boost as they savage the low paid - Exclusive
By Jason Beattie 17/06/2010
David Cameron was accused of double standards yesterday for hanging on to his "gold-plated" pension perks.
The Prime Minister has also agreed bumper retirement packages worth a total of £4million for the ConDem team of spin doctors and advisers.
The revelation comes just days after Mr Cameron and his sidekick Nick Clegg launched an attack on pensions paid to millions of public sector workers, many on low pay.
The PM took a pay cut when entering No10 but his retirement fund is still being treated as if he was earning £196,000 a year rather than the actual level of £142,000.
Advertisement - article continues below »
Mr Cameron nearly doubles the amount going into his pension pot from £9,000 a year to £17,000.
The money is on top of his MP's pension which could be worth as much as £40,000 depending on how long he stays in the Commons.
He also has the option of taking the Prime Ministerial pension worth £66,461 a year.
Unison general secretary Dave Prentis said: "This is hypocrisy of the worst order. The Government reward themselves huge pensions and deny low-paid public sector workers a few pounds a week in retirement."
Tory Mp Philip Davies attacked Government plans to save £2.2billion by a "reduction in the numbers sent to jail".
Vote in a politician. Then watch as he does the complete opposite, of that which he expressly promised in order to secure his seat. Be ruled by a government that does not possess a majority mandate to govern. Be refused referendums on policies that affect every citizen in the country. Have elected representative cowed into supporting motions, which their constituents would never agree to.
Some say that taxation without representation is tyranny. Others say that big society is not characterised by the many being disenfranchised then disadvantaged by the few.
Keep things in perspective here, it sounds like you are in the governments pocket.
And, how much did the bankers cost the country? Are they paying for it? NO.