UK

Transgender Model Munroe Bergdorf Fired By L’Oréal Over 'All White People Are Racist' Remark

'This rant is as bad - if not worse - than the first one.'

01/09/2017 13:14 BST | Updated 01/09/2017 14:42 BST
Dave M. Benett via Getty Images
L’Oréal has sacked Munroe Bergdorf, its first transgender model

L’Oréal has sacked its first transgender model who on Friday attempted to defend her “all white people are racist” comments by explaining that “western society as a whole, is a system rooted in white supremacy”.

Munroe Bergdorf, who was brought on as the cosmetic company’s ‘face of modern diversity’ and appeared in its recent ‘#allworthit’ campaign with Cheryl Cole and Katie Piper, was dropped days after being hired for making comments that were “at odds” with its values. 

The 29-year-old Briton had written on Facebook: “Honestly I don’t have energy to talk about the racial violence of white people any more. Yes ALL white people.”

It continued: “Because most of ya’ll don’t even realise or refuse to acknowledge that your existence, privilege and success as a race is built on the backs, blood and death of people of colour. Your entire existence is drenched in racism. From micro-aggressions to terrorism, you guys built the blueprint for this shit.”

L’Oreal said in a statement that it “support diversity and tolerance towards all people irrespective of their race, background, gender and religion”, and on that basis had to fire Bergdorf.

“The L’Oréal Paris True Match campaign is a representation of these values and we are proud of the diversity of the Ambassadors who represent this campaign.

“We believe that the recent comments by Munroe Bergdorf are at odds with those values, and as such we have taken the decision to end the partnership with her. 

“L’Oréal remains committed to celebrating diversity and breaking down barriers in beauty.”

Bergdorf has since attempted to put her initial comments in “context” saying her “rant” was a direct response to the violence of white supremacists in Charlottesville and was “not written this week”. Protests there on August 12 led to the death of Heather Heyer and weeks of political scrutiny after US President Donald Trump failed to single out those responsible.

Bergdorf, who works as a DJ and trans activist, went on to talk about the “success” of the British Empire - “at the expense of the people of colour” - before doubling down on her initial remarks.

“When I stated that ‘all white people are racist’, I was addressing that (sic) fact that western society as a whole, is a system rooted in white supremacy - designed to benefit, prioritise and protect white people before anyone of any other race. Unknowingly, white people are socialised to be racist from birth onwards. It is not something genetic. No one is born racist.”

Santiago Felipe via Getty Images
Bergdorf on Friday attempted to put her comments in context, but effectively double downed on them

She then took aim at L’Oréal saying if it truly wanted to champion equality and diversity it needs to “actively work to dismantle the source of what created this discrimination and division in the first place” rather than just “cash in” on a hole in the market. 

“If brands are going to use empowerment as a tool to push product to people of colour, then the least they can do is actually work (sic) us to dismantle the source, not throw us under the bus when it comes to the crunch. At times like this, it becomes blindly obvious what is genuine allyship and what is performative.

“I stand for tolerance and acceptance - but neither can be achieved if we are unwilling to discuss why intolerance and hate exist in the first place.”

While some on Facebook were supportive of Bergdorf’s position and bravery at speaking “difficult truths” many pointed out that “this rant is as bad - if not worse - than the first one”. 

“Don’t dig the hole any deeper, I think you are already buried,” another person wrote.

 Read Bergdorf’s full defence of her initial remarks below:

First up, let’s put my words in context, as the Daily Mail failed to do so. This ‘rant’ was a direct response to the violence of WHITE SUPREMACISTS in Charlottesville. It was not written this week.

Secondly, identifying that the success of the British Empire has been at the expense of the people of colour, is not something that should offend ANYONE. It is a fact. It happened. Slavery and colonialism, at the hands of white supremacy, played a huge part in shaping the United Kingdom and much of the west, into the super power that it is today.

Whether aware of it or not, in today’s society the lighter your skin tone (people of colour included) the more social privileges you will be afforded. Whether that’s access to housing, healthcare, employment or credit. A person’s race and skin tone has a HUGE part to play in how they are treated by society as a whole, based on their proximity to whiteness.

When I stated that “all white people are racist”, I was addressing that fact that western society as a whole, is a SYSTEM rooted in white supremacy - designed to benefit, prioritise and protect white people before anyone of any other race. Unknowingly, white people are SOCIALISED to be racist from birth onwards. It is not something genetic. No one is born racist.

We also live in a society where men are SOCIALISED to be sexist. Women are SOCIALISED to be submissive. Gay people are SOCIALISED to be ashamed of their sexuality due to heterosexual people’s homophobia. Cisgender people are SOCIALISED to be transphobic. We do not need to be this way. We are not born this way and we can learn to reject it. We are just socially conditioned to think this way from an early age. With the right education, empathy and open mindedness we can unlearn these socialisations and live a life where we don’t oppress others and see things from other people’s points of view.

So when a transgender woman of colour, who has been selected to front up a big brand campaign to combat discrimination and lack of diversity in the beauty industry, speaks on her actual lived experience of being discriminated against because of her race and identifies the root of where that discrimination lies - white supremacy and systemic racism - that big brand cannot simply state that her thoughts are not “in line with the ethics of the brand”.

If you truly want equality and diversity, you need to actively work to dismantle the source of what created this discrimination and division in the first place. You cannot just simply cash in because you’ve realised there’s a hole in the market and that there is money to be made from people of colour who have darker skin tones.

The irony of all this is that L’Oréal Paris invited me to be part of a beauty campaign that ‘stands for diversity’. The fact that up until very recently, there has been next to no mainstream brands offering makeup for black women and ethnic minorities, is in itself due to racism within the industry. Most big brands did not want to sell to black women. Most big brands did not want to acknowledge that there was a HUGE demographic that was being ignored. Because they did not believe that there was MONEY to be made in selling beauty products to ethnic minorities.

If L’Oreal truly wants to offer empowerment to underrepresented women, then they need to acknowledge THE REASON why these women are underrepresented within the industry in the first place. This reason is discrimination - an action which punches down from a place of social privilege. We need to talk about why women of colour were and still are discriminated against within the industry, not just see them as a source of revenue.

Racism may be a jagged pill to swallow, but I suggest you force it down quickly if you want to be part of the solution. Doing nothing, does nothing and solves nothing. Empowerment and inclusivity are not trends, these are people’s lives and experiences. If brands are going to use empowerment as a tool to push product to people of colour, then the least they can do is actually work us to dismantle the source, not throw us under the bus when it comes to the crunch. At times like this, it becomes blindly obvious what is genuine allyship and what is performative.

I stand for tolerance and acceptance - but neither can be achieved if we are unwilling to discuss WHY intolerance and hate exist in the first place.