Gone are the days when the word troll was nothing more than a moniker for those under-the-bridge dwelling creatures in childhood fairytale. Now the appellation has transcended the fictional world into the sphere of social networking, terrorising celebrity and civilian alike with all the venomous power 140 characters can wield.
Trolling has been hitting the headlines of late, from sad individuals mocking the deaths of teenagers to more high profile attacks on public figures like Louise Mensch MP, Miranda Hart and of course, the most recent case concerning Olympic diver Tom Daley, whose late father was used as a form of attack in a malicious tweet sent by a juvenile and foulmouthed delinquent.
By merely retweeting @Rileyy_69's comment, Tom Daley served this particular troll up to endure the wrath of his followers, the national press and rolling news channels. Some would say the retaliatory attacks by the young Olympian's followers is just desserts for the young tweeter, but I'm not alone in finding it somewhat uncomfortable to witness the gang-like approach adopted by Daley's 'defenders'.
In response to my tweet regarding the foul language used by @Rileyy_69, (not just in his subsequent tweets against his haters but in comments made before Daley-gate) James Ball, Data Journalist for the Guardian replied, "Have you looked at the tweets he's *getting*? People are sending him death threats. For sending death threats."
"Also posting his mobile, etc. Bit of a nasty mob mentality going on. Playground stuff hitting the front pages."
How can it be justifiable to take this old-testament style response? Who knew the archaic "eye for an eye" mantra could be substituted for "a tweet for a tweet"? Well I say it can't and it mustn't or we risk sinking to the troll level from the precious moral high ground.
We should definitely not be adopting @Rileyy_69's methods in response to his own tweets.
Just by attacking him, @Rileyy_69 has seen his Twitter following increase exponentially, leading him to become (albeit briefly) a worldwide trending topic. Subsequently we have created a greater platform for the young man to impart his abusive commentary.
So if we are to apply Biblical rhetoric to our dealings with cyber-bullies like this challenged individual, let us do it new testament style by turning the other cheek.
Why?
Because as we continue to put ourselves out there by sharing our every action, thought and opinion on the ever-expanding stage of social media we need to accept that with the good comes the bad and the damn right ugly.
Essentially, it is our choice whether we let these trolls affect us or not.
I choose not.
Follow Hanna Flint on Twitter: www.twitter.com/hannaines
Nick Armstrong: Here Cometh the Twitter Trolls (Still, Again?)
John Pavley: Internet Trolls: Disconnect and Reflect on Alan Turing
Ros Satar: Tickets, Transport and Twitter...
Angelina Chapin: Charlie Angus: "Twitter Has Turned Us All into 14-Year-Olds in a Cafeteria"
Tom Daley Trolled on Twitter: Dis Results in Outrage - NowPublic.com
Daley hits out at Twitter troll - Yahoo! News UK
Tom Daley: Twitter troll taunts diver over dead dad Rob after - Mirror
Tom Daley: Troll twists knife as Tom flops: Hate tweets add to misery ...
Tom Daley hits out at Twitter troll who claimed diver had 'let his ...
The death threat message cycle is the ad absurdum outcome which can be reached in relatively few steps, and due to the public nature of twitter can lead to complaints being made to the authorities - which really doesn't help anything.
Best to stop and think before responding. Comments can be taken out of context - or may be outright credible threats. Take appropriate action.
Twitter should be regarded as minimal email where you do not have complete control of the CC list. If you are in a public position with a lot of followers - bear this in mind and treat each tweet with care.
This is the new world we live in and folks better get used to it, fast.
yes, i post here and know it is not a safe place for anyone's privacy but i risk opining because it was important to me and others long before "social media." as a writer i'm exposed enough even using pseudonyms.
we saw what you did……
….nothing
you sure are boring!
Just kidding!
But how about this one?
Blows and wounds cleanse away evil, and beatings purge the inmost being.
— Proverbs 20:30
Or this one?
And I will cause them to eat the flesh of their sons and the flesh of their daughters, and they shall eat every one the flesh of his friend.
----Jeremiah 19:9
and that was just because they wouldn’t listen to him!
And so I propose these more humane updated alternatives:
And forgive us our tweets as we forgive those who tweet against us….
Tweet unto others as you would have them tweet unto you….
It is better to give tweets then it is to receive tweets……
The Kingdom of Tweetdom is upon us…..
The Kingdom of Tweetdom is inside you….
Tweet not what your country can tweet for you, tweet instead what you can tweet for your country……..
And though I tweet with the tongues of men and angels and have not charity, I tweet as sounding brass or tinkling cymbal……
If it weren't for the truly radical DemocRATS/Liberals/Progressives/Islamists we would not have terms such as swatting now would we? What about the Twitter Gulag? Who came up with the idea of repressing free speech by exploiting a loophole in how Twitter operates? OMG would it be?? DemocRATS/Liberals/Progressives/Islamists???? Yes it is!
You might want to use a full length mirror and stand back 20 feet to see just how awful your side has honestly become!