Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hannah Ellison

GET UPDATES FROM Hannah Ellison
 

Where Have All the Good Women Gone?

Posted: 19/03/2012 23:00

Last week marked the 15th anniversary of the pilot of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, this landmark got me thinking: Where have all the decent female characters gone?

Buffy was meant to change things. In many ways she was the perfect third wave feminist TV character, strong, capable, independent, and all while choosing how she wanted to express her femininity. For a while things did seem different. Like them or not we had the irrepressible force of the women of Sex and the City, The heartfelt rationalism of Friday Night Lights' Tami Taylor, The West Wing's no nonsense C.J.

But what about now, who can women turn to when they want a female TV character capable of passing the Bechdel test? (For those unaware the test comes from a comic strip by Alison Bechdel from 1985 and states that a narrative worth watching has at least two women in it, who talk to each other, about something other than men) It's not that there's a dearth of female characters on TV, it's what they do while they're there.

Grey's Anatomy features one of the most diverse and gender balanced casts on TV, but try finding a female character whose plot does not revolve around her love life or children. Even Christina Yang, a character who started as a strong, ambitious character learning she's also allowed a personal life, last week spent an entire episode in couples' therapy.

Glee, another show that started out focusing on a female character whose career dreams kept her going, is now one of the most anti-female shows airing. The show consistently belittles the role of women, using them as little more than emotional leaning posts for their boyfriends, boyfriends who are always heroic and decent. When Finn outed Santana it was treated as a good thing, Finn helping her come to terms with her sexuality by serenading her with a cover of Girls Just Want to Have Fun. After all, lesbianism is just girls having fun, right? Weeks later when Dave Karofsky suffers similarly by being outed it is shown through an emotionally overwrought montage and makes way for a story about teen suicide.

The imbalance is beguiling. It doesn't end there. NBC's new hopeful Smash spends most of its time on two women fighting each other for male approval, Bones Brennan now does little more than talk about her baby, and a recent episode of The Walking Dead had the few female characters literally giving up their right to vote as part of their group of survivors and deferring to the men.

Those shows that do feature women more prominently and not as an adjunct to a male character, shows like Revenge and Once Upon a Time, instead provide us with women who are conniving, scheming, underhanded and in the case of Once Upon a Time, literally evil. The women of sitcom fair a little better, but rather than evil they tend to be stupid and unable to function in society; though the same could be said for the men of sitcom.

There is one bright hope in the depths of all this gloom: The Good Wife. Interestingly the show that started with a woman whose entire life revolved around her husband and children, just look at the title, is the one show that gives women an independent voice. Each female character is allowed nuances and complexities, motivations that include family and career; very different from those shows which only foreground women as constantly choosing between family or career. The women of The Good Wife are sexually in control (it seems to be an unwritten rule that every character in the show wants to sleep with Kalinda, and she knows it), capable of running businesses and having a work life that is not about romantic relationships, but also does not preclude them. They play with gender bias and stereotyping on a weekly basis, continually making the audience aware of their own gender assumptions.

Despite the critical success of The Good Wife it doesn't look like things are going to improve soon; the current trend in TV is toward martyred males (see new shows like Awake and Touch), shows which feature very few female characters, is disheartening. Buffy fought so that every girl who had the potential could take up the fight, it's time TV producers remembered that and gave us more good wives and fewer bad girlfriends.

 

Follow Hannah Ellison on Twitter: www.twitter.com/hanellison

Last week marked the 15th anniversary of the pilot of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, this landmark got me thinking: Where have all the decent female characters gone? Buffy was meant to change things. In ...
Last week marked the 15th anniversary of the pilot of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, this landmark got me thinking: Where have all the decent female characters gone? Buffy was meant to change things. In ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 43
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:25 PM on 04/18/2012
I'm just going to watch Mulan, bye guys.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crumpets
05:39 PM on 03/26/2012
Our society that seems to think that equality between the sexes requires that men and women are seen as the same and that biological/emotional/evolutionary differences between them must be denied beyond all reason. At University I see women who will argue till they are blue in the face for this kind of 'feminism' and then turn around and hook up with/have relationships with/marry men who are prototypical males. This shows that the fundamental reality of life is that just as men are programmed to find feminine women (both in terms of behaviour and appearance) more attractive than their short haired venom spouting counterparts - a fact that many 'feminists' loathe, heterosexual women - no matter how ardently 'feminist' they are at a cerebral level, are wired by millions of years of evolution to be attracted to certain 'old fashioned' male characteristics and there is nothing they can do about it.

I guess my bottom line is that men and women are obviously equal (we are from one another) but we are not the same. Our society and modern 'feminists' need to accept this and realise that things like traditional gender roles etc whilst of course not being compulsory on anyone ARE A NATURAL EVOLUTIONARY MECHANISM to make families work and raise physically and emotionally healthy children. As a society, we need to move past our rebellious phase, grow up and stop forcing women to think that any traditional role is backward and unhealthy.
04:30 PM on 03/26/2012
try looking in the real world, especially in your family. trying to find role models in t.v land is a bit sad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
06:40 PM on 03/25/2012
- Fringe
- Whitney
- 2 Broke Girls
- New Girl
- 30 Rock
- Pretty Liar
- The secret circle

Not all masterpieces I agree but, except for How I met Your Mother, I see mostly girls in TV shows today, in both comedy and drama. What you sure don t have is the iconic character that is a badass like Buffy, but let's be realistic, how many of these characters are there today?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crumpets
07:12 PM on 03/26/2012
Buffy was always absurd. A tiny thin framed (and I'm fairly sure cocaine using - nasal septum issues) actress that was throwing around well built guys like they were paper mache always looked absurd, and more comedic than anything else.

I agree with you in that there are lots of TV programmes with strong female characters - but this is less true in movies. Having said this, I find it difficult to take it seriously when you have females in typically male roles (the Terminator in Terminator 3 comes to mind).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
11:53 PM on 03/26/2012
Women are fondamentally stronger than men... we are feeble creatures if you put aide the muscles, with limited will, and limited willingness to have a will :)
05:50 AM on 03/25/2012
At this point, I'd be happy just to see a good character, of any sex, on TV

I'm sick and tired of characters who are shades of grey.

Give me a decisive hero and villain anyday.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Eli Davidson
Award Winning Small BusinessReinvention Expert
04:07 AM on 03/25/2012
Men tend to see powerful women as evil women. As women ascend in power there are more and more disturbing images of women in the media. Women need images of females succeeding and doing so with grace. If we aren't seeing them in the media...let's become those role models ourselves.
12:35 PM on 03/24/2012
Beckett, in Castle and any of the women in CSI: NY and Criminal Minds spring to mind as contradictions to the rule, not to mention a dearth of female characters in Game of Thrones. I think maybe looking for "failures" of female characters rather than looking at the variety of different female protagonists out there is bound to lead to the view that women are being misrepresented.
05:41 PM on 03/22/2012
OUAT is about Fairy Tales...they have evil queens BUT only ONE. Ruby is a fiercely strong female character and Emma battles with the choice to do things the right way or the wrong way which is a VERY human thing. In Smash the only reason they're "fighting each other for male approval" is because the director of the Broadway show is male. They're fighting for the role, not for a date. It's very accurate for how theater is, you fight and fight for the approval of someone. The only thing I really agree with you on is Glee because seriously, those girls are terrible.
08:52 PM on 03/21/2012
I agree with all except Bones and Once Upon a Time. Bones is pregnant, as is the actress I believe. So the show takes a season to focus on something that is a "traditional female role." Being feminist doesn't mean you can't focus on motherhood. In fact, feminism should focus on what being a strong mom means to women. And OUAT has a bunch of strong female characters. Snow white is not the helpless princess Disney shows (she's not waiting for her prince to save her - she'd doing quite a bit of saving herself). Nor is little red ridding hood. It makes me wonder if you've watched it. On the other hand: where is Grimm on this list!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Hannah Ellison
12:09 PM on 03/22/2012
I agree, motherhood and feminism are by no means mutually exclusive, my problem is the shift in emphasis on the show. Previously Brennan was the lone female character on the show whose story wasn't always about romantic relationships or children; when the new season started every case came back to the Booth/Brennan relationship plot. What I was hoping for was a greater balance and the show hasn't delivered that.

As for OUAT I'm not suggesting every female character on it is problematic and of course its premise predicates certain characterisations, however, there is something problematic about the conflation of power and moral laxity/duplicity.

I think it's a question of wider TV context. OUAT would be great if we had other shows featuring powerful women who weren't also evil.
And Grimm? I only managed the first episode before giving up.
08:38 PM on 03/21/2012
Great article & soooo (sadly) true...For fun, our weekly TV night with friends is now spent watching the Canadian SyFy "Lost Girls."

It's a great escape, sexy fun & the main character (Bo) is kick-ass! It's also great because it's like a mash-up of what you wanted to see (more of) in Xena & Buffy...Bo's sidekick (Kinzie) is like her own Gabrielle/Willow & then there's Dr. Hot Pants (Lauren), mmmmm. Anyway, check it out & then seek out all the online FanFic + YouTube to make up for what's lacking on telly!
04:06 PM on 03/21/2012
I love The Good Wife, for this reason among others (and Kalinda too!). However, I find the strongest female lead in a show is Anna Torv in Fringe. Alcatraz (didn't watch much of it yet, however) seemed promising. And Castle's lead lady Beckett is a brilliant example of a role model.

There are lots of shows with not so great women characters. But it's not the decisive factor in tv watching. I like shows about guys too. And a lot of people are imperfect--a lot of girls are dumb, needy, love-centric, etc. Let's just make sure (like the eternally misinterpreted TRAGEDY of Romeo & Juliet) that it's obvious they aren't the role models.
03:48 PM on 03/21/2012
No mention of "Bones"? The character Brennan is confident she's the best forensic anthropologist in the world, also a best-selling novelist and likely the only avowed atheist as a title character ever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Galician
Keep calm and carry on
12:09 PM on 03/21/2012
Lip Service, showed women that can be lesbian and great profesionals as well. It was not only based on "having a good time" or their sexual lives but I completely agree with all what you said.

A tv series based on Angela Carter's short stories could be a good starting point.
10:51 AM on 03/21/2012
I will add to the Parks and Recreation comments. Leslie Knope is a brilliant feminist role model (for television.) Still Parks and 30 Rock have predominantly male casts, despite their female protagonists. I also think Sons of Anarchy deserves a mention. I would never expect a show about a biker gang to pass the Bechdel Test, but it does on several occasions, and not only that the women are smart, powerful, and often treated as equal partners to the men. (Also worth a mention: Nurse Jackie, Weeds, American Horror Story.) As far as the Bechdel Test, or strong, well-rounded female characters (which the Test doesn't account for) are concerned, I don't think television is the worst culprit. Film is where women are vastly under and miss represented.
05:39 AM on 03/21/2012
I know this article and conversation is US based, but there is a hilarious new British comedian called Miranda who has her own show. It is absolutely brilliant. She is a great central character with wonderful female peripheral characters and non-sexist male peripheral characters too.

Glee had such potential...I stopped watching it ages ago after being one of its biggest fans. The focus went towards the male characters and especially Kurt, because the producer is a meglomaniac and it became all about him....

2 Broke Girls is an example of some tv producer trying to attempt to appease female viewers but getting it completely wrong - it's incredibly misogynistic for a show that's based on women.

Parks and Recreation has a lead female character isn't too bad. In fact, I quite enjoy that show....the female lead is not young or beautiful. She's ambitious and a bit of an oddball, which is always nice to see.

Again, moving away from the US, New Tricks is an English cop show with one of the best female tv characters out there. She's the boss of three men, she's not sexualised and she's not young.

The female characters on Dr Who may be strong, but they are sidekicks. Surely it's time for the Dr to be a woman.