With the Budget now just days away the families that we work with are waiting with baited breath to see if the Chancellor will throw their finances a lifeline or push them further beneath the waves.
There's been lots of noise from the children and family sector over the last few weeks calling for George Osborne to protect family budgets.
We've had our very own Family Fortunes report which included a wealth of experiences and research into the fragile state of the finances of the families we work with. We've also had the Child Poverty Action Group's Save Child Benefit Campaign and Gingerbread, Daycare Trust and Save the Children's Mums United report.
The findings we striking in their similarity - parents are finding it increasingly difficult to provide for their children and safeguard their futures and balancing the books is harder than ever.
And we all want the same thing - George Osborne needs to take urgent action to give parents the lift they need so they can secure their children's future fortunes.
The Chancellor was caught red handed raiding family budgets by the Institute for Fiscal Studies the other day. They proved that tax and benefit changes in 2012/13 will hit households with children the hardest. Figures from Usdaw show that working families could lose nearly £4000 in working tax credits if a couple don't increase their combined working hours to 24 rather than the 16 they work at the moment. The Mums United report shows that 150,000 of the UK's poorest single working mothers could lose up to £68 a week under the new Universal Credit, pushing a quarter of a million children deeper into poverty. 'Second earners' - most of whom are also mums - also stand to lose up to £1800 a year.
There was more bad news last week for families looking for more hours when official statistics showed that part-time employment rose by 59,000 to 6.6 million and full-time employment fell 50,000. The number of people working part-time because they could not find a full-time job increased by 110,000 to its highest level since records began in 1992.
These are big sums for families. And the loss of these amounts from family budgets will send parents into despair. For many these losses will be the difference between making work pay, putting food on the table and balancing the bills.
That's why we're continuing to call for the Chancellor to be a family man in the Budget on Wednesday. We want to see his reverse course and protect families, and invest in children's futures. Our Family Fortunes parents sent a clear message to the Chancellor to:
With all eyes on the Treasury, this week is set to be a milestone for families. The Chancellor could break the bank for many families. We hope he'll listen and protect their future fortunes.
George its over to you...
You can tweet the Chancellor your messages by joining Family Action's #OiGeorge campaign.
Follow Helen Dent on Twitter: www.twitter.com/family_action
Jai Breitnauer: Working Mums Are Deluded
Ed Miliband: budget should help working families – video | Politics ...
BBC News - Budget: Chancellor urged to avoid 'break-up' measures
Tax credits: effect of Budget changes from 6 April 2012 : Directgov ...
1) Spending rather than saving money
2) A conscience
Sady for us all, this Government so often fails to see past its short-term goal of reducing the fiscal deficit - likely because they know it will be extremely near impossible to get reelected so don't care about the mess - with so many of their policies reliant on the tabloid press focussing on the short term that they cost so much more in the long run. A prime example is the Legal Aid bill; undeniably the budget has to be reduced but one of their many ad hoc slashed is to remove (non-discrimination) employment law from the scope of eligibility, meaning any cases must be bought either no-win no-fee (which requires near certainty of winning) or with after-the-event insurance (which is expensive and requires the claimant to be able to fund the case independently from start to end, considering they have often lost their main income is very unfair). This will inrease costs in areas such as the Employent Tribunal with litigants-in-person creating huge delays (despite originallly being designed for lay people they have become increasingly technical), on the NHS as the effects of any injury in workplace negligence as any damages to assist with medical costs are unavailable and the DWP as the would-be claimant is either unable to work or trying to find new work, to name a few examples.