Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Helena Gillespie

GET UPDATES FROM Helena Gillespie
 

Is Big Brother Really Bothered?

Posted: 2/04/2012 00:00

Another week has started with yet another alarming story in the press about how the government plans to snoop on us and our electronic communications. Civil rights bodies such as Big Brother watch are up in arms once again about this attack on our privacy but is it really something we should worry about?

It is very easy for the press to write stories which make us all feel that our every move, every email, Tweet, every Facebook status update, every text message and perhaps even every blog is being watched for signs of subversion.

So I'm here to confess, right now, where this government are concerned, I'm subversive. I re-tweet anti-Tory rhetoric on Twitter. I laughed out loud at the anti-Gove version of Michael Rosen's We're Going on a Bear Hunt circulating on Facebook. I've got a 'Vote Green' sign in the window of my house. But is anybody really watching? Does anyone care? Clearly not about me, I'm just exercising my democratic right to disagree with a government I did not vote for.

But if I was more serious, if I really meant to harm myself or other people in the name of politics and religion, would the new laws really stop me? And am I really being watched any way? I'm not so sure.

Some might say I'm a heavy user of electronic media, but when I talk to people here at my university, there's not much difference between me and others here on campus. I update to Facebook two or three times a day. I send about 30 emails a day at work. I text at least a dozen times a day, and phone a couple of people too. I spend an hour or two on the internet, I tweet and blog pretty regularly. I've even started dabbling with Localmind and foursquare. So I've done some sums: the above adds up to more than 50 communications a day. I work in a university with over 10,000 staff and students, all probably communicating in a similar way at a similar rate. That's half a million communications a day, in one medium-sized university. Multiply that by every other Higher Education Institution, business, school or organisation in the country. If Big Brother is really watching us all, he's going to need eyes in the back of his head.

Liberty make a serious point about the potential infringement of human rights, and the fact that Big Brother probably isn't watching doesn't make it any less palatable in principle. There is a powerful counter argument to this that says that our human rights are even more threatened by terrorists, so we must trust the security services to do whatever they feel necessary to protect us.

But whatever the rights and wrongs of the proposed legislation are and however effective, or not, the new laws would be in protecting our National security, there is an important lesson in all of this for society as a whole. We must all be aware of the potential of the media we use.

Electronic communication gives us the ability to publish to a potentially global audience at the touch of a button. Power to protect much of what we do is in our hands. Facebook are notorious for changing privacy settings but it is relatively easy to lock down our accounts so they can only be seen by friends (or even close friends). It is clear that email is not a good medium for a confidential or sensitive conversation, especially if it is sent to your smart phone and you don't use a passkey.

Twitter is totally public and there need to be aware that we can re-tweeted at will by our followers and their followers. In terms of financial transactions, PayPal is safer than sending bank details by electronic media. If we really want to fight against Big Brother, or at least people who want to laugh at our political jokes, steal our credit card details or snoop at our photos, then the power is largely within our hands.

I belong to the generation who have seen such technologies evolve, but using them was not part of my formal education. This makes us particularly vulnerable to a lack of understanding of what we can do to protect ourselves electronically. Part of this is not to leap on every band wagon of media hype about who is watching us, but to learn to protect ourselves.

 

Follow Helena Gillespie on Twitter: www.twitter.com/helenauea

Another week has started with yet another alarming story in the press about how the government plans to snoop on us and our electronic communications. Civil rights bodies such as Big Brother watch are...
Another week has started with yet another alarming story in the press about how the government plans to snoop on us and our electronic communications. Civil rights bodies such as Big Brother watch are...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
hearthammer
If left is right and right is wrong, decide!
12:56 on 08/04/2012
After reading this, I'm reminded of Pastor Niemöller.

You never know what you've got till you lose it.
15:45 on 03/04/2012
“If Big Brother is really watching us all, he's going to need eyes in the back of his head.”

I totally disagree with your perspective. You’re describing what is proposed using analogies that bring to mind thousands of civil servants all slaving away at computer screens watching the UK with bated breath; a thoroughly ridiculous idea. You’ve written this without grasping how easy it is to write analytical software these days. It is all just a matter of enough servers, enough processing power and bandwidth, and employing a few chaps who can both develop software with competence and who understand statistical analysis. The government could easily pull that off for £10million or less, pittance to them in the grand scheme of things.

Having access to this sort of data, when it’s been fed through the computer cleverly, is like sitting on a goldmine. They would be able to anticipate much more accurately our reactions to their agendas, and therefore adjust accordingly. Much like Facebook, it would be a great resource for companies to use when it comes to marketing products; more revenue at our expense. But most importantly, it will also enable them if they so wish, to easily single out minorities. Whether that is people with sexual fetishes, gay people such as myself, or members of the Monster Raving Looney party, it doesn’t matter. At the end of the day, no government should have this power without court legislation.
photo
novelist2000
veritas non olet
06:20 on 03/04/2012
A reliable European source told me maybe 6/7 years ago that ALL telecommunication is monitored. Rather baffled I kind of kept my eyes open on the topic and found it confirmed. One expert even spoke of baby monitors being monitored. In the EU there is or was a system called echelon.

My guess for the current manoeuvers is that if or rather when London exits the EU, they will no longer have the use of that system and must have their own, which of course takes a little to set up so they have to start now. There is a real possibility apparently that Scotland becomes independent and joins the EU. London does not fit into the EU so sooner or later they will have to leave, then requiring their EU independent system. They could get off their high horse of special conditions, but won't of course. Europeans are rather tired of London, and Scotland might be more able to be a team player.

This legislation and monitoring system is not new. In criminal cases old phone calls, mobile phone locations, and/or old emails are often used in court. Where would they have them from unless everything is monitored and stored? It's the modern world, get over it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laatab
All The Worlds A Stage
21:18 on 02/04/2012
Helena, you dont get it. This legislation gives the government a mandate to put in place a structure that will have far reaching consequences for people just like you. This isn't about terrorism. They broke the back of those organisations a long time ago. Now and again theres a little flurry of activity, just enough to keep you believing the terrorist threat is real and an imminent danger providing them with a mandate to keep stripping away personal freedom.

Global Warming and Peak Oil seems to be problems that are off in the future. They have spent a lot of resources debunking Global Warming and have said little about Peak Oil. But the latter is an imminent threat.

You probably have the notion that oil will run out slowly, and that we'll adapt and all will be roses roses for our way of life. But they are not going to sit back and let it all dribble away. They will turn the tap off suddenly and preserve whats left for themselves.

When this happens it'll be mass starvation and a backlash of anger. This legislation is a tool for them to deal with this anger and when it comes the first targets will be those who can articulate and focus it. And thats why people like yourself are the ones in most danger from it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pietro Sommavilla
20:21 on 02/04/2012
"And am I really being watched any way?"

It depends..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Mcilroy
12:34 on 02/04/2012
I think that TV like Spooks and 24 have given an impression that Big Brother can do just about anything. With the amount of data being spewed into the digital data banks by people there is no way that it can be scanned and checked in real time unless a specific user is being targetted - and if you are that target surely it is better that the security services know you aren't spending your time looking up how to brew an explosive device so they can move on to someone else.

I think the real purpose of the law is to permit the police to look at your records after arrest to see if there is anything incriminating rather than to have computers constantly monitoring the web for suspicious activity when any potential terrorist will avoid mentioning the b word or the t word