Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hugh Salmon

GET UPDATES FROM Hugh Salmon
 

What Makes a Snob?

Posted: 27/09/2012 01:00

In Britain, the question is did Andrew Mitchell call the Downing Street police 'plebs'?

Elsewhere it is "who on earth is Andrew Mitchell?" I suspect, at the time of the incident, the police did not know who he was either: which may be why they asked him to exit Downing Street by the little gate at the side rather than the big gate in the middle.

Andrew Mitchell is the Conservative MP for Sutton Coldfield. In the recent Cabinet reshuffle, he was appointed government Chief Whip and Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury. Not for long methinks.

The police record of the incident is revealing:

"Mr Mitchell was speaking to PC ******** demanding exit through the main vehicle gate into Whitehall. PC ******** explained to Mr Mitchell that the policy was for pedal cycles to use the side pedestrian exit. Mr Mitchell refused, stating he was the chief whip and he always used the main gates....

After several refusals Mr Mitchell got off his bike and walked to the pedestrian gate with me after I again offered to open that for him.

There were several members of public present as is the norm opposite the pedestrian gate and as we neared it, Mr Mitchell said: "Best you learn your f******* place... you don't run this f****** government... You're f****** plebs." ... "

Here is the media line: did Mitchell call the police plebs? As a public schoolboy, is he a snob? Are all public schoolboys snobs?

In a post last year 'The Curse of Cameron' I suggested that David Cameron is a snob which is why he simply does not understand people. Quite simply, he has never had to live in the real world.

Since that post, we have hosted the Olympics and witnessed the extraordinarily positive response given to Boris Johnson and the real affection in which he is held. Like Cameron, Boris went to Eton. How can two Etonians be perceived so differently?

Having been to public school myself, I have observed a behavioural difference in the behaviour of those of us who have to work for a living and those with a private income: who do not have to work for a living.

When faced with pressure or adversity, such as not being allowed to leave Downing Street through the important gate, the people of independent means - spoilt brats you might call them - are more prone to hissy fits like Mitchell.

I do not know their individual circumstances, but this might explain the contrasting ways in which David Cameron and Boris Johnson relate to the rest of us. Apart from his likeable personality, natural sense of humour and willingness to admit mistakes, is a reason why Boris has more 'common touch' than Cameron that Boris has to work for a living?

And what about disrespectful, self-important, jumped-up, cry-baby Mitchell?

Apparently he made a lot of money as a merchant banker.

What a superior chap he must be.

Not.

Read more: http://adifferenthat.brandrepublic.com/2012/09/26/what-makes-a-snob/#ixzz27Zty4WH7

 

Follow Hugh Salmon on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TheSalmonAgency

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
In Britain, the question is did Andrew Mitchell call the Downing Street police 'plebs'? Elsewhere it is "who on earth is Andrew Mitchell?" I suspect, at the time of the incident, the police did not k...
In Britain, the question is did Andrew Mitchell call the Downing Street police 'plebs'? Elsewhere it is "who on earth is Andrew Mitchell?" I suspect, at the time of the incident, the police did not k...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
lastpost
see biography
14:21 on 27/09/2012
“What makes a Snob?”
Is it placing an ‘s’ where a ‘k’ should be?

“why they asked him to exit Downing Street by the little gate at the side”
All part of the government cut back on openings for the constabulary?

“in the real world”
Hogwarts is a comprehensive.

“How can two Etonians be perceived so differently?”
Ah, did some experience the gifty gee him, to see himself as other’s see him?

“those of us who have to work for a living and those with a private income:”
Its easier to maintain the illusion that one’s personal internal rendition of reality is the real thing. If it doesn’t have to be brought into close proximity with someone else’s.

“What a superior chap he must be.”
Cycleclipus Exitsaysame!
11:29 on 27/09/2012
Mr Mitchell, I'm sure, would have said something which was offensive to the officer. For that he has apologised. I think there is an underlying issue that we have all encountered. A person, appointed authority, rather than earning authority by a lifetime of education, self discipline, and selfless hard work. This isn't to say in the case of police officers and others that they have dedicated there life and experience to their jobs, but never the less, it is appointed authority as opposed to earned status. At the lower end of the spectrum we have clampers and 'bailiffs' who have been on a half day course to earn their authority, and on the other end of the scale we have judges etc. that have gained their authority through years of dedication. It is however, still appointed authority. Mr Mitchell, I believe feels that he has earned his authority, when really he is an appointee. I suppose the frustrating thing for many of us is that we have 2 appointees in a 'p*****g contest' over who's more powerful. The police, in particular, over recent years have been targeting easy wins over the last few years by going for the people that they are meant to represent (earners, taxpayers, drivers, etc.) and are increasingly disenfranchising themselves from the mainstream people. Hence, the increasing lack of respect from many of us. No answers I’m afraid, just comments on why there are increasing issues related to 'Authority'.
10:11 on 27/09/2012
On one hand you have an accusation by the police against a government minister, about a tirade of abusive language following an incident at a security gate. On the other you have the British Government questioning the integrity of these officers, stating what they report is untrue. In Britian a Policemans notes can be used as evidence in court, they are trusted. This incident puts into question the validity of, not only these notes but, other cases where they are accepted as evidence when used in prosecution cases. Wether an insulting word was used or not is irrelevant, during a week that followed the release of documents (Hillsborough) highlighting a cover up of evidence by high ranking police officers and government officials, this casts a shadow on a major part of the judicial service.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Booth
11:37 on 27/09/2012
..and demonstrates good reasons for trusting neither side.
photo
mrs w waugh
Hail Caesar We Who Are About To Die Salute You
12:59 on 27/09/2012
Then what happens if we need them for something,can we trust them then.to help us............