Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jack Pelling

GET UPDATES FROM Jack Pelling
 

Who's Who? The Doctor Who Movie Contenders

Posted: 30/11/11 14:41 GMT

Last week we brought you the news that Harry Potter director, David Yates, is planning the next big screen outing for the BBC's long running Sci-Fi series, Doctor Who. Exciting news, but now that these rumors have been confirmed, it's an apt time to consider what may be in store. 

All we know so far is that Yates wants to take the character in a new direction, distancing himself from not only the current 11th Doctor Matt Smith, but from the whole post-Russell T. Davies (the man who revived the series in 2005 after a long hiatus) era. This might well suggest that celebrity guest stars, young, sexy Doctors, and lashings of heart-wrenching sentiment might well be absent from the feature length version. 

Yates seems like an excellent choice for the project, with his work on the last few Harry Potter films elevating the series to a point that would have seemed inconceivable when Chris Columbus was at the reins. He also is experienced in television crossovers, with his excellent Mini-series State of Play receiving the Hollywood makeover in 2009.

There is currently no script, but with the amount of DW fiction around, it is unlikely there will be a drought of writers queuing up for this one.  One name that comes to mind is Neil Gaiman, whose most recent episode marked the zenith of the most recent series.  He also has the big screen experience, having penned several novels that have undergone the transition to the movie theatre including Coraline and Stardust.  Gaiman has expressed a wish to return to Doctor Who, and his unique imagination and sci-fi background would make him the most obvious choice. There is a more pressing issue however, that is already occupying a considerable portion of the internet's rumor mill, and that is the question of the star, so let's take a moment to consider the contenders for the role of the Time Lord.

Matt Smith

As mentioned above, this seems an unlikely choice given Yates' desire to take the series in a new direction, but Matt Smith has brought a depth to the character that we've not seen before.  His physical performance is peerless and the 28-year-old plays an ancient Time Lord convincingly without ever losing any of his childlike charm. What further removes Smith from the front-runners is the fact that his tenure as the Doctor will most likely have come to an end by the time the movie is released. With one more series to go, it looks like the 11th Doctor will have long since regenerated by the time the DW film hits our screens.

 

Hugh Laurie

According to some reports, Hugh Laurie is the favorite for the role. His recent global superstardom would make him an attractive proposition for the studios, and he certainly has the gravitas and upper middle-class demeanor of the original, older Doctors. One downside could be that he lacks the more quixotic element of the Doctor's personality, but you only have to think back to his work on the Blackadder series to be reminded that he's not all acid tongue, snarls  and limps.

 

Stephen Fry

Hugh Laurie seems to be getting all the attention, but what about his old double-act partner, Stephen Fry. Fry possesses the avuncular nature of William Hartnell; the eccentricity of Tom Baker; and David Tennant's gift of gab.  he infrequency of his acting roles may make it hard to imagine him taking the part, but if it is the earlier style of Doctor the producers are after, they could do a lot worse.

 

Johnny Depp

It is perhaps unsurprising that Johnny Depp is a name that is being thrown about, as he is pretty much in the hat for any highly anticipated role, but it's his attraction to the British oddball suggests that it is not a completely wild stab in the dark.  The one problem that most will have is accepting an American Doctor. Although Depp has mastered the British tongue in many different forms over the years, the Doctor, like James Bond, is so quintessentially British that the die-hards would never accept it, irrespective of the fact that the Doctor is from an entirely different galaxy.

 

Michael Sheen 

Despite having appeared in the last series of Doctor Who, the Welsh actor would be a great choice to play the Gallifreyan time traveler.  Sheen is an excellent comic and physical actor and would bring the same dramatic depth to the character that has become a staple of the show since Christopher Eccelstone arrived in 2005. His ability to fully inhabit a character would be wonderful to watch in the case of the Doctor, as there is so much source material for him to draw on.

 

James McAvoy

Another popular choice; James McAvoy would continue the trend of a younger, more swarve Doctor, and his previous work with director David Yates on State of Play would suggest that he could be a genuine contender.  It is easy to imagine the X-Men star in the Baker-esque coat and scarf, pontificating incomprehensibly technological jargon, and he certainly has enough of a Hollywood reputation to attract the ever growing American audience that the producers will have their eye own.

Let me know who you'd like to see as the 12th Doctor.

 

Follow Jack Pelling on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MyCelluloidHero

Last week we brought you the news that Harry Potter director, David Yates, is planning the next big screen outing for the BBC's long running Sci-Fi series, Doctor Who. Exciting news, but now that thes...
Last week we brought you the news that Harry Potter director, David Yates, is planning the next big screen outing for the BBC's long running Sci-Fi series, Doctor Who. Exciting news, but now that thes...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:48 AM on 12/02/2011
"James McAvoy would continue the trend of a younger, more swarve Doctor,"

"swarve"?
11:09 PM on 12/01/2011
Really, if it ever gets off the ground it could go either way.

Someone has already mentioned The Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy which was all very flashy with better special effects than the TV series that preceded it. And it had a superb cast, including the wonderful Martin Freeman in the lead role, but for many it came across as all style and no substance. Upping the romantic plot to make it more suitable for Hollywood and/or modern audiences fell flat.

And since you mentioned State of Play, the original series is almost universally beloved and highly acclaimed. The movie is really very good and also had a great cast, but never was nearly as well liked or successful.

The Harry Potter movies are the ONLY screen version of those books ever made. They don't have to compete with a much beloved TV series in the memory of fans.

And in the case of Doctor Who, we are talking about just about the MOST beloved series in the history of British TV. And it's STILL SHOWING. That's incredibly stiff competition to take on, that is.
11:12 PM on 12/01/2011
(continuing on)

To conquer that, you are going to need, not just a talented movie director/producer/writer. You are going to need an uber-fan like RTD or Moffat or many of the others behind the scenes like Mark Gatiss, Phil Collinson and Toby Whithouse. You need someone who both understands and respects the huge legacy of the show, but also someone who isn't afraid to challenge it.

Moffat and Gatiss showed that it could be done with that other huge British icon Sherlock Holmes. (yes, a TV series rather than a movie, I know).

Show me that Yates has the same understanding of the source material and brave exciting ideas of what to do with it, and then I'll get excited about this movie.

As for casting the Doctor, well, they'll undoubtedly go for a "Name" to lure in the punters. But the best castings for the role (IMHO) were always relatively low profile actors who just "got" what it was about the Doctor that made him amazing - and then ran with it. David Tennant and Matt Smith are both great examples of this. So was Tom Baker.
10:41 AM on 12/01/2011
Two words: Paul McGann.
Paul McGann is already established in the role having played the part for the 1996 made for TV movie. That was the only visual casting of McGann as the Doctor (he's appeared in numerous audio dramas as the Doctor.) Giving McGann the opportunity to reprise the role would be welcomed by many fans of the series and would allow the film version to cooperate with the TV series instead of compete against it.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jack Pelling
Freelance writer. Editor of CelluloidHeroes.co.uk
10:52 AM on 12/01/2011
I really like Paul McGann as the 8th Doctor, but unless they started from scratch, they would have to ignore everything that had happened with the 9th/10th/11th. Who knows what will happen, but as the TV movie was written into the story of the TV series, I'd be surprised to see him return.
Chauncey1186
EMAILGATE!!!
05:31 AM on 12/01/2011
This movie will go the way of Hitchhiker's Guide....out of the theatres and onto blue-ray faster than you can say "Tardis"!

Some things just should not be messed with - and Doctor Who is one of them.
10:34 PM on 11/30/2011
Personally I think every country should have its own version of Doctor Who. Think of the crossovers they could have! The people moaning that it might not be part of the TV continuity presumably complain every time there's a new version of Batman or Robin Hood that's not a direct sequel to the one before.

Hugh Laurie's actually a fine contender. He's a good actor, he's likeable, he's British but known to Americans and the newspapers can do lots of lazy "Dr House to Dr Who" headlines.

With regards to Stephen Fry, it's a mistake to cast somebody with a stereotypically 'Doctor-ish' default persona. Always better to cast an actor with some range.

On the writing front, note how those Gaiman films weren't actually written by him? He's comics/novels writer brought in for nerd cachet. Then he decided to make his episode of Doctor Who about... Doctor Who. That would be death to a movie.
07:21 PM on 11/30/2011
Oh no. This is not good. Amerciazing the show and making it a blockbuster takes out what the shows about... It doesn't work. Do not do this, unless it's written by proper doctor who writers. and acted by someone cast by the doctor who executives for the show.

Having a celebrity to play the part wont work it's whether they can play the part well, I sincerely hope this won't be just selling out the show. Just my opinion, but there was a doctor who film before done by Hollywood and it didn't end out so well.
04:55 PM on 11/30/2011
Sheen and McAvoy would be fine choices, but I don't think anyone anywhere will suggest a better nominee than Stephen Fry. He's the performer who instantly came to mind, and the more I consider him the more suitable he seems.