Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jai Breitnauer

GET UPDATES FROM Jai Breitnauer
 

Working Mums Are Deluded

Posted: 11/04/2012 00:00

One of my friends has a saying; No sh*t Sherlock. And I guess that sums up my initial reaction to the study comparing working and full-time mums. The article claimed researchers had 'discovered' mums who took time out to work were healthier, felt less isolated and were under less stress than full time mums.

No surprises there then. Because even though I'm a hands-on parenting advocate, I accept that motherhood is hard. The hours are long, it's badly paid and it puts demands on you physically and emotionally that would have any other 'employer' up before the International Court of Human Rights. Time-out to 'be yourself' at work breaks up the intensity of full-time parenting.

When I really started to think about it though, I realised my own experience didn't fit the study's model. Take health for example. It's easy to say that when I was working I was healthier. I had a high disposable income that lent itself to well chosen food - sushi was a fave - and a fancy gym membership. In contrast, I spend most lunches now hurriedly shovelling a couple of slices of toast while bribing my pre-schooler to eat his veg. But there are lifestyle changes as a result of motherhood that far outweigh the benefits of a 'light lunch'.

For instance, I rarely drink alcohol now - and I don't miss it either, because kids are more fun without a hangover. I always eat breakfast with my boys, and it's always fruit and yoghurt or a bowl of cereal to set a good example, whereas before I'd often power through to lunch on just a latte. And there is, of course, all the background exercise. I might not pound the treadmill for 40 minutes a day, but try carrying a two-stone toddler and a baby up the stairs, while singing, several times in a 12 hour period. It's both toning and great for lung capacity, I assure you. In reality I'm much healthier now, running round after the kids, even though I'm not wearing gym kit or following a celeb diet.

Isolation is a big issue for new mums, and I'd be lying through my teeth if I claimed I wasn't affected by this. The first six months after I had my eldest were some of the loneliest of my life. All my old friends were still single and working full time, so I struck out to find mum buddies, but with little success. At first, I couldn't understand why - I was going to all the coffee mornings and toddler groups, putting the miles in. It was my husband who said it; why was I expecting to be friends with people just because they had kids too? When you start a new job you don't expect to be best buds with the guy in the cubicle next to you, and two people who own the same model car are rarely kindred spirits. I was being too hard on myself, placing the bar too high. By walking into a mother's meeting and expecting to just 'click' with people I was setting myself up to fail.

Friendships take time, and in any other context we realise this, but there is a sense of urgency that comes with motherhood that warps our perspective. Many women out there got a great sense of camaraderie and support from ante-natal groups, but felt relieved in many ways to return to work - to return to the familiar folds of easy friendships. To feel 'themselves' again. I worry that they may have missed out though. By the time Isaac was 16 months I'd met several people I now count among my best friends, and we've had not only the luxury of time to develop those connections, but we've been able to move on and accept our new role as 'mother' together, rather than trying to recreate the person we were before we gave birth.

Lastly there is the stress issue, and I feel the crux of this is perspective again. Before I had Isaac and Eli, I'd be wired at work - the one who stayed late, planned ahead, whose world ended when something didn't pan out despite my efforts. Then, someone placed a tiny, innocent and all trusting bundle in my arms, and told me his life was my responsibility. And suddenly, all those things I worried about before, they just paled in comparison. Looking after kids is pretty stressful, because it is so emotive. No one gets my back up like my eldest son, and I will defend him vehemently to others, even when he is in the wrong. The burden of deadlines and office politics is almost a breath of fresh air in comparison - a curiosity that I can look upon as an outsider who knows the truth about what really matters in life. When I am at work I see my old stresses very differently and can happily shrug them to one side.

So how come the research results suggested working mums were happier, healthier and more social? I believe working mothers are deluded - me included. We have been socially conditioned to perceive working woman and motherhood in a way that leads us to misinterpret our own health and happiness in either context. For a start, rarely do you see images in the media of a slim, stylish, professional woman who also has a couple of kids in tow.

Just as the career woman is often portrayed as an ice maiden whose ovaries have been switched off, mums are usually presented as frazzled, ditsy, and at their wits end. I'd hazard a guess that we fairly readily accept and adopt these stereotypes, in the same way as we accept social conditioning that allows our positive identity to be intrinsically linked with our career. This society places value on work, and modern feminist ideals about independence are often interpreted financially - high divorce rates quoted as a reason to maintain a personal income.

But I believe that while our worth is tied to our wealth, the joys of motherhood will remain undervalued. This isn't just to the detriment of family life, but also undermines the most central value of feminism; choice.

 

Follow Jai Breitnauer on Twitter: www.twitter.com/2wheeledtoddler

FOLLOW UK LIFESTYLE
One of my friends has a saying; No sh*t Sherlock. And I guess that sums up my initial reaction to the study comparing working and full-time mums. The article claimed researchers had 'discovered' mums...
One of my friends has a saying; No sh*t Sherlock. And I guess that sums up my initial reaction to the study comparing working and full-time mums. The article claimed researchers had 'discovered' mums...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nic the wonder puppy
When life throws lemons, throw them back
12:03 AM on 05/26/2012
Mums is more proper than Moms. If I can escape my yard, I coming to England.
01:12 AM on 05/03/2012
I think I like this article, mostly. What I disagree with is the last sentence. Feminists are liars about wanting to give women a "choice" Simone de Bovwhat'erbutt said that women should not have the choice to stay home and raise children, simply because too many women would choose this.
photo
Catriona
Wha daur meddle wi me?
05:29 PM on 04/11/2012
"No one gets my back up like my eldest son, and I will defend him vehemently to others, even when he is in the wrong."

And this is wonderful mothering?
11:38 AM on 04/11/2012
Excellent posting. Mims delude themselves. They cannot do everything perfectly. I never understood why someone would take on dual important responsibilities. Smething has to suffer. It is usually the kids. It is where women themselves need to just say enough.
11:00 AM on 04/11/2012
It is getting increasingly difficult for single mums to get into work! So half the time we are forced into staying home with the children.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jordan Baldi
Technocrat
05:45 AM on 04/11/2012
Does transgressive caregiving solve the problem of undervalued home work?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AwesomeInfo
10:59 PM on 04/10/2012
"This isn't just to the detriment of family life, but also undermines the most central value of feminism; choice."

You have hit the nail right on the head. You will be consistently undervalued and victimized until you take that "freeing" step of divorcing your husband and going out to get a job. Anything else and you are a victim of the patriarchy.

However, in reality for mums or dads, it is the most valuable, fulfilling time of your life. It's like having a second childhood. As long as the parties in the relationship don't fight over which one gets to stay home and which one has to go to work, you end up appreciating every minute (OK, almost every minute) you have with the kids.

And again you are correct in that it is a choice in our current society. It's not some great mythological curse on women to be at home taking care of the children, but a privilege to be able to stay home with them. You'll find a lot of young mothers (and fathers) who feel like you, but the older generation will always have a different litmus test for your situation. Don't listen to them. The freedom of choice and the responsibility that comes with it doesn't create victims...that's left to those that try to undermine the ability of others' to choose because it doesn't end up at THEIR result.

You have a great attitude. Never let anyone get you down.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Shreen Ayob
11:07 PM on 04/11/2012
I've always admired women who are full time mothers and who resisted the false premise that "having it all" means spreading yourself too thinly, and find it deeply sad that anyone would criticise the choice to do so. I think the value we place on careers is far, far too high - there are many more pleasures in life than simply chasing a salary.

The idea that certain [non-harmful] choices are more preferable than others goes against everything feminism is about, and so I chose not to associate such opinions with the movement. :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AwesomeInfo
12:12 AM on 04/12/2012
"I chose not to associate such opinions with the movement."

Me neither. Keep up the good work.
09:22 PM on 04/12/2012
But is that choice? You seem to be saying the choice of having children and a career is not a viable one. Second wave feminism came out of women not having the choice but to be housewives. Yes, now there are more opportunites for women in employment, but do we accept that comes at the price of foregoing motherhood? Or, instead, should we be fighting for complete choice - work, motherhood, both. It isn't impossible to have both, it is simply that the world of work is not ordered with women in mind. That can be changed, as can the continuing devaluing of full time mothers. Do we just give up or do we fight for a differently ordered world that allows women to be fully rounded human beings, to fulfil their potential whatever that might be. Is that impossible? It shouldn't be, women carry the majority in all democracies around the world.