It has been reported that the National Front (NF) is planning on fielding 35 mayoral and local election candidates in May, the largest number it has put up for election since 1983.
An outfit that most of us thought had disappeared in the 1980s has re-emerged due to splits that are currently ravaging the British National Party (BNP).
All being well of course, NF candidates will take a thorough battering at the polls next month. Fortunately, the economic crisis that began in 2008 has not yet been marked by the racial tensions that characterised large economic crises of the past.
And yet, were a far-Right government ever to win power in Britain - and never get too complacent, for a Searchlight poll last February found a staggeringly high number of voters who said they would be prepared to vote for party of the far-Right if it renounced violence - what might it do in its first year of power?
This is pure speculation of course, but interesting all the same, I think.
Isolationism
Recent wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya are often simplified into a Left/Right question: if you are on the Left you were against them, if you are on the Right you supported them. This is crude and misleading. In the tradition of isolationism, the British far-Right is concerned with foreigners only when they directly threaten the national interest. This includes foreigners dying at the hands of barbaric regimes.
The far-Right believes barbarism to be a product of uncivilised peoples or cultures which cannot exist in this country unless imported from the outside. A far-Right government would see its role only as the protector of the British people from this perceived threat.
The first year in power of a far-right government would most probably see a withdrawal from NATO, an exit from the European Union and an end to all overseas aid spending. Foreign massacres would be dismissed as "savagery". Actual military spending, however, would be doubled.
Which leads me neatly on to...
The worship of monarchy and the armed forces
One of the problems a government of this sort would have is that although the British people like pomp and ceremony, they don't much go in for compulsory pomp and ceremony. People of the Left recoil at widespread enthusiasm for the Royal Family, while forgetting that a good deal of it is based on little more than a detestation of the political class. The Royals are quite obviously establishment figures - they are the establishment - but when set against politicians there is a widespread belief that they are somehow less a part of the ruling class than Parliament is. Such a dynamic only works, however, so long as the monarchy is not viewed as an extension of the government.
With regard to the military, huge hostility would be whipped-up, with the aid of the media, towards any figure who publicly criticised military spending or the increasing deployment of troops to quell internal unrest and break strikes. Such people would be branded "unpatriotic" and denounced as Communists. Several military figures would probably enter the Cabinet within the first year of government.
The economy
Initial nationalisations would see elements of the far-Left align themselves with the new government in the manner of previous alliances with "anti-imperialist" movements abroad. A renegade former Labour MP is perhaps the most prominent Left-spokesperson for the new regime, playing up the Government's anti-American credentials while ignoring the widespread suppression of minority rights.
During unrest the army is drafted in. This is incredibly popular until the children of the middle classes feel the brunt of it. They are protesting at the general decline in living standards brought about by UN sanctions imposed for Britain's treatment of religious minorities. Great fanfare is now made in the press about the "great British tradition of protest".
The minimum wage is abolished along with the right to strike. State intervention in the economy increases albeit unaccompanied by any understanding, let alone indictment, of capitalism as a system. The living standard of workers falls while foreign investment is scared away.
Immigration
All immigration from "culturally foreign" countries - a catch-all term conveniently catching almost all non-whites -is brought to an end. Large numbers of people leave the country, including thousands of white Britains with non-white spouses. Discrimination against non-whites is not enshrined in law but institutional racism is ignored. Racial theorists are regularly given a voice in the media and an atmosphere of general hostility is whipped-up towards Muslims in particular.
A distinction is created in the public mind between 'good' and 'bad' minorities on an arbitrary basis. Wealthy non-white businessmen occasionally line-up alongside the Government to denounce recent immigrants, who they describe as work-shy and lazy.
The government imposes quotas for white players on English Premier League football teams.
Culture
The BBC is told to impose a strict limit on the number of non-white people in its soap operas. LGBT characters are categorically banned. There is a new trend toward jingoist documentary making and revisionism about the British Empire. Most BBC programming harks back to a world that no longer exists and probably never did. The most popular TV entertainment show is Top Gear.
Widespread rioting and looting of Muslim areas breaks out when England are knocked out of the football World Cup by Iran. The government, backed by a formerly prominent member of Ukip, labels all Arabs 'cheats', not realising that Iran is not in fact an Arab country.
An attempt to severely limit abortion causes a split in the Cabinet as some members see it as a potentially effective way of controlling the poor. Homosexuality is outlawed and an attempt is made to re-introduce Victorian sexual morals. The attempt fails when half the cabinet are found to have been having affairs and the wife of a working class minister is found to have once posed in Escort Readers' Wives.
In London, Saturday mornings see uniformed Right-wing militias parading in Hyde Park. The militias are regularly purged due to widespread homosexual activity. Animal rights charities report an increase in donations and the most recent census indicates an unprecedented rise in the number of vegetarians.
Follow James Bloodworth on Twitter: www.twitter.com/obligedtooffend
Nick Ryan: The Road Travelled By Breivik and Other Killers
Andrew Taylor: Censorship is Rarely the Way to Deal with Prejudice
Assed Baig: Proud and Prejudiced - A Critique
British Union of Fascists - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
British Fascists - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
New British Fascism by Matthew J Goodwin – review | Books | The ...
History of British fascism, from the British Union of Fascists (BUF) to ...
And never mind the non white people who the NF might try to stop entering the UK, how would the NF stop the white people who have been leaving the UK in ever growing numbers to live abroad.
A right wing Government would probably do exactly the same as any other Government we have had over the years, nothing.
instead of years of legal wranglings and The Euro courts of human rights telling us what to do !
immigration halted
better military
out of EU
out of NATO
no more foreign wars
keep the royals
no more eastern european gangs, african gangs
we'll deal with our own troublemakers
not having to wonder if Strasbourg will overrule us
has to be non violent and the UK running the UK not europe
WHERE do I sign up !!
But let's not face reality..local election's are here again; time for the left to attack the BNP, or rather, it's time for a pig to complain about the smell from its own sty.
Muslims make up about 5% of the population. Even with higher birth rates, a population of that size will not eclipse, dwarf or dominate other sections of the population.
It's a bit hypocritical to say the only fascists are the BNP. It's downright dangerous. Has the author ever heard of corporate fascism? The kind of fascism that's a lot more subvert and manipulative than any right-wing nationalist. It's corporations that have made this country what it is, in the name of progress.. and you don't need to tell anyone here about the effects; they live them every single day in the jobs they do, the wages they earn, the prices they pay for their goods and the living standards many of them endure. This is real - it's not a hypothetical situation.
But it can be worse, much worse. It's corporate fascism that turns one race against another; that starts wars (Iraq and Iran to name but a few), it has no intention of resolving. It's easy to blame it on someone else and - low and behold - every single time the election comes round it's easy and convenient to point the finger at the BNP..
With respect, I generally find citing Searchlight akin to a pot calling the kettle black? The left can be just as militant as the right, can it not?
Really? surely it would more likely be 'Jim Davidson pisses on a minority (and only stops when they thank him for letting them into this beautiful country)' ?
Both EU and UK politicians work for the benefit of companies who buy the decisions their businesses need by lobbying. This is amply illustrated by the fact that is it the very rich who continue year in year out to increase their wealth while it's the public who are faced with reduced lifestyles. The EU parliament admits there are over 4000 lobbyists http://www.euractiv.com/pa/eu-lobbyists-scramble-exact-numbers/article-173152
Galloway won against all three main parties because he was seen as the only party representing the public interest. In London UKIP are likely to get as many votes as the Lib Dems. This shows a marked lack of trust in the three main parties by the UK public throughout the UK.
The public are looking for politicians to represent their interests over the interests of more global unaccountable bodies such as the EU and the rich. In France Marine Le Pen's vote could come close to challenging both main parties.
"The most popular TV entertainment show is Top Gear"
C'mon man, if you dont like it, dont watch it, just dont link it with Facism...