A picture of London's new Olympic Velodrome recently caught my eye. Its double-sloped steel roof and natural cedar wood siding are striking.
Does it match the grandeur of China's famous Bird's nest stadium? Perhaps not. But beneath its veneer there's arguably a more impressive piece of structural engineering. Steeply banked tracks mirror the natural lean of a bicycle as it winds a turn, maximising speed and efficiency. The roof, meanwhile, is made of 10 miles of cable netting, making it half the weight of Beijing's.
A giant oval-shaped metaphor of function over form. And testament to my personal notion that engineers create their best work against the odds.
For the two weeks of the Olympics, London will be the most watched city in the world, seen by over a billion people. More than just an event for sporting achievement, the games are, for two weeks, a projection of London. But a look at the legacy of past games offers a cautionary tale that hosting the Olympics needs to be seen not just as a short-term event but a long-term investment.
With nearly $40 billion invested in infrastructure alone, Beijing gave true meaning to the Olympic motto Citius, Altius, Fortius, a Latin expression meaning "Faster, Higher, Stronger." China's first foray as a global host in 2008 was designed to create a sense of awe. From spectacular venues and grandiose ceremonies to the home team's dominance of the medal table, the Games announced China's growing influence as an economic and political power.
Economic uncertainty demands Britain be creative and nimble in its vision. If China was the Olympics' golden darling, Britain is the austerity Olympics. The elaborate games in Beijing reflected a booming economy -- exports had grown a whopping 22%. The UK has taken a more modest approach: a reflection of a sobering market and steep cuts in government spending.
But it wouldn't be the first time that budgetary circumstances have galvanised engineers and architects to produce stunning work. In 1873 Chicago faced a similar challenge. It followed Paris' popular and prosperous World's Fair -- which saw the debut of the Eiffel Tower. Chicago was in the midst of a depression and had little time to prepare. Daniel Burnham, the architect spearheading the Fair's design, challenged America's civil engineers to be bold. Temporary but complex buildings were created to shave costs and street lights were introduced to make them usable at night for the first time.
Beyond its buildings, the Chicago Fair inspired a golden age of invention: from Ford's motor car to the dishwasher. Thriftiness can also spark resourcefulness and engineering ingenuity.
Engineers are nothing if not problem solvers. In 1948, Britain hosted the first post-WWII Olympic Games. With no money for stadiums, the main venue, Wembley stadium -- still used today for concerts and sporting events -- was a converted dog track. It might have been meager, but it was one of the most profitable Olympics.
London has taken the same tack in 2012: using the games to revitalise the city's decaying east end. Rather than a one-off celebration, the city sought to balance remarkable design while considering future use.
While Beijing's historic sites and public transport have vastly improved following the games, many of the 37 custom built Olympic venues languish. The Bird's Nest Building is little-used, aside from the occasional ping-pong tournament. It will take three decades to recoup the $480 million it cost. The Water Cube, where Michael Phelps picked up six gold medals, now hosts perfume and rice wine sellers rather than swimmers.
London has taken a less-is-more approach. Just five buildings will remain in London after the games. This presented several design challenges for architects and engineers. Permanent facilities blend into the surrounding parkland while temporary venues are constructed of removable and reusable materials.
London's Aquatics Centre was purposefully built to have just 3,500 permanent seats -- down from 20,000 -- following the games. The Olympic Village will find a second life as a new housing and commercial area. And the Olympic park will be London's biggest new green space since Victorian times.
Today, Athen's Olympic park is a ghost town: a symbol of excess as Greece grapples with its debt crisis. Barcelona has seen its football club move out, leaving a monument of a stadium without a permanent resident. Atlanta, the Olympic host in 1996, might be the only recent exception. Although marred by transport and construction problems its legacy prevails. Its two arenas are now home to professional sports teams. The Olympic Village has been converted into university dormitories and its Olympic Park has helped bring development and people to downtown.
I'm proud of London's ambition despite the economic situation; the engineering equivalent of a stiff upper lip. Rather than comparisons to the grandeur of China's games, London's will showcase reuse and leave behind new opportunities, not empty stadiums. This will be a testament to the planners and the engineers and their designs.
James Dyson is an engineer and founder of Dyson.
Live: London 2012 Olympics Opening Ceremonies
London Olympics: USA should be right there in the medals race
Olympics tweeted, Storified, Facebooked
How competing networks will counterprogram NBC's Olympics
Mitt Romney's crippling Olympics neurosis
Legally blind archer sets world marks at Olympics
Olympic Swimming: Michael Phelps' Toughest Competitor is Teammate Ryan ...
But there is a huge bit of grit in this oyster, a giant zit on the face of the whole project. The stadium. LOCOG held out for a permanent athletics venue that could host a future athletics world champs. and compensate for the Pickets Lock fiasco. Seb. Coe committed to recover the status of UK Athletics. Run the tape forward and now we are designing the Stratford Olympic Stadium.
LOCOG and Seb. Coe were told scores of times that the only viable legacy was as a football stadium with a rectangular pitch. He was told by Westham old and new owners, Barry Hearns at Orient, Daniel Levy at Spurs along with many others. He (Coe) held out for an oval pitch despite offers of refurbishing the Crystal Palace Athletics venue, which I have visited for an Athletics World Cup event and found to be most congenial. Today, July 28th 2012, the stadium legacy is unresolved.
Now is the time to support Team GB. But when the dust settles and the stadium falls dark many questions remain unanswered.
The other thing that struck me is Britain's celebration of its health care system. They might have conservatives in power and be strapped for money, but they are not giving that up. British are clearly proud of their health system, and wanted to show that to the world. We in America could certainly take that point.
Just a bunch of opinions and not even substantiated
by any happening or event to even reflect from as
an example and should have been placed as an
editorial, rather than a news item of information.
Actually, the elaborate opening shows absolutely
no hint, or even idea of financial problems. It
reflected far more technics than the Olympics
in Bejiing, which had a mystical style - and
amazingly organized considering the vast amount
of participants, considering England is a small
coutnry by comparison to Asia, whereas London
does not need more buildings to depict Olympic
history, because London maintains history itself
as a city, which is also amazing. We all saw
the wonderful structures still standing as a
greater environment and indeed a show by
itself, without needing any viewpoints frankly.
Just awe! Wonder! Appreciation!
You just can't help some people.
as nice as the moderators during the week, and I am in the leper colony
with most of them, so I have to hope it gets through for everyone has
a right to defend themselves. I don't know where my comments get posted,
as I'm not allowed a reply at all, so it's definitely persecution of sorts.
I was wrong to jump on the article but my complaint is so many
opinions and viewpoints are thrown at the public, nobody knows what is
really ongoing or happening. If HP claims to be a newspaper, it should
state this is an editorial as a courtesy, as the media is flooded with
writers with an MA in communication pretending to be experts on events
and happenings from a desk, without any experience whatsoever behind
their opinions. People believe what they are told, and it's very
Rupert Murdoch stuff.