Violence is the purest way to split the left and the right. It sidesteps the cloudy, dreary political waffle and cuts directly to the chase: what causes people to do bad things.
Both left and right see the London riots as the flashing illumination of a dark malaise. Those of a leftish disposition tend toward structural explanations: that disenfranchised youth, frustrated by the closed doors of opportunity and poor housing, have finally revolted. Some misguided opportunists, such as Ken Livingstone, have tried to link it to government cuts - even though they've barely begun.
By contrast, anyone of a rightish disposition considers the riots the signal failure of a decadent culture, where young people are no longer taught personal responsibility or respect for authority, and parents have relinquished any kind of moral duty over their children's behaviour. We ran a quick content analysis of right-wing and left-leaning blogs (another blog will follow shortly with the results). Words like 'unemployment', 'political' and 'economic' are more talked about on the left; words like 'order', 'authority' and 'property' feature more heavily on the right.
One word didn't appear on either side but should have: fun. Uncomfortable as it sounds, for some people, smashing a window in with your boot, flinging rocks at police officers, and running off with a PS3 is a blast if you're 18 and hanging about with other bored mates. Albert Camus was on to something when he wrote that the sinister "excites". Violence is powerful, and it is especially powerful if you feel yourself a loser in the game of life, and is directed against those you believe have rigged the rules against you.
The term 'recreational violence' is associated with annual disturbances in North Belfast in recent years. One 2005 report by the Institute of Conflict Research speculated that much of the recurrent interface violence is provides a means of entertainment, or more simply of 'something to do' - an antidote to the boredom of the summer holidays. Father Gary Donegan said in 2010 of one night of rioting, 'it was a bit like a Euro Disney theme park for rioting. It was ludicrous.' There is a striking similarity to what has taken place in London. More and more stories are emerging of bragging rights, of boastful escapades, of the revelry that was had.
This does not negate entirely the left's and right's concern with politics/economics or individual responsibility, but they are likely clinging to the coattails of adrenalin. As ever, what will follow is a period of reflection and duelling anecdotes in the media about causes and responses. That must include serious consideration of what to do with our army of bored, restless young men for whom the toxic mix of glamorous violence and disdain for authority is an intransigent part of the sub-culture. If we don't entertain them, they will entertain themselves.
Follow Jamie Bartlett on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JamieJBartlett
Richard (RJ) Eskow: England's Ashes -- America's Future?
Its been predicted for a while now, maybe not in this exact form but im pretty sure those perpetrating the violence are the same
http://bit.ly/pj7MeN
I think people are looking to score political points off this. Liberals want to blame Thatcher and the class system. Conservatives want to blame liberals and the welfare system. But no one is actually listening to the words coming out of the looters' mouths. It's fun to smash things, they are stealing the things that they want, no one can stop them, etc.
The totally inane comments from some of those caught on video (e.g. "I want my taxes back" - from someone who looked about 14), showed that some had a vague idea of what they were expected to be saying, but it was clear from most of the footage that this was indeed just a fun way to spend the evening.
-----------------------------------------------------------
From bread and circuses to the heart of the problem:
How are Western societies going to provide meaningful work to the semi-skilled and unskilled masses?.
My government is certifiably insane, we have been warehousing surplus, unskilled labours for decades in places like Hackney for decades. These types of riots have happened before, so what do the various administrations do? They allow in even MORE unskilled labours via immigration, thinking well some of them will work cheap without complaining,others will start small business, the rest we'll dump in council housing.
Seriously, what did they THINK would happen? A few million problematic people would magically go away?
I understand that most in the streets in the UK now are not so young as we were when we did what we did. But perhaps the lack of opportunity there has led to a bit of extended faux-adolescence, in that many young people now are still living in the places they grew up in, still under their parents' roofs, with no end in sight. Perhaps this is why anti-social activity with one's mates still appeals, and why more youth centers will not necessarily lead to a more compliant and cooperative population of young people, so long as there is little chance to mature into independent, responsible adults....
Is this the kind of thing that went on in the last days of the Roman Empire? I wonder.