Peter Kellner
:Cameron's EU Tactics Backfire
Deborah Jack
:End Homophobia to Reduce HIV
Philip Mansbridge
:G8 or Too Late: Obama, Cameron and G8 Heads Must Tackle Ivory Poaching Crisis Now
European Parliament Web Team
:Homophobia: One-In-Four LGBT People Victim of Violence or Threats in the Last Five Years
Neil Durkin
:A Week's Delay Should Suffice: Is the UK Still Dragging Its Feet on Guantánamo?
As a Ukip member I am taking up blogging on this site to defend and explain the policies of Britain's third party of politics, and to debunk some of the lazy journalism that is written about us. Too often Ukip's political enemies and those in the media take swipes at us by branding us racist and homophobic and for having ill-thought out and un-costed policies. It is understandable when you are a threat to the established, cosy tripartite system at Westminster.
I fought the last election as a Tory PPC in a key marginal seat (Batley and Spen under my previous married name of Small) and joined Ukip 18 months ago. I left the Conservative party when Cameron's Conservatism left me, when I wasn't allowed to speak the 'evil' of the European question and told to shut up on my support for grammar schools and uncontrolled immigration. More on this in subsequent posts.
Our enemies claim we are a one-man, one issue party. No so. The party is not just Nigel Farage, human dynamo that he is. We have eleven MEPs and tipped to do even better in the 2014 Euro elections, knocking the Tories off the top spot. Most of our MEPs have been in business, a rarity in Brussels and for most British Euro MEPs, who are mostly party apparatchiks or ex-Brussels officios. Of course, like any party, we have disagreements on policy; some members holding more libertarian views than others and those that hold the opposite views to some policy issues such as gay marriage.
Let's take that little political time bomb first. Ukip's stance on gay marriage is simple: we entirely, wholeheartedly support equal rights for couples regardless of their sexuality and we believe this has been achieved through the introduction of civil partnerships, which Ukip supported. However, we believe faith leaders have the right to defend their belief that 'marriage' is between a man and a woman. In this country we have hate laws and, despite Cameron giving assurances that all faiths will have the right to opt out of gay marriages, as prime minister of the United Kingdom, a member of the European Union and subject to the rulings of the European Courts, both of Justice and Human Rights, he does not have the right, nor the power to make such a guarantee. Instead, faith leaders will be prosecuted under hate crime and other judicial rulings.
Where does our support come from? Most of the media would have you believe that our support is from disaffected right-wing, aged Tory members and voters - Bufton Tufton down at the golf club with a gin and tonic in hand, a bulbous purple nose, sporting a club tie with odious hang 'em and flog 'em ideas. No so. Yes, many of our supporters come from Thatcherite Tories, old and young (more anon), and Mondeo man who voted for Thatcher in 1979. However, most of our support in the north of England comes from ex-Labour voters because they see the London metrosexual elite of the Labour frontbench and increasingly their carefully selected MPs, as out-of-touch with their lives. They see that uncontrolled immigration has had a devastating effect on their employment and wages. The arrival of eastern Europeans who are cheaper and willing to work longer hours have undermined the British workforce. I ask where are the six figure salary union leaders speaking up for their members against immigration? Why are they not demanding that Miliband adopt a common-sense approach to limiting immigration? He cannot because he wholeheartedly believes in the EU as does Cameron and they cannot stop the arrival of unskilled labour (more on Romania and Bulgaria whose 30m inhabitants will have unfettered access to our jobs and homes coming soon).
Ukip would like to see us take control of who we issue visas to. Why can't we discriminate in favour of the brightest students from India and China who want to work and study here instead of low-skilled eastern European migrants whom we have no control over? Recently, Ford announced the closure of its Southampton plant with the loss of over 500 jobs. Ford had taken EU and British taxpayers' money via the Treasury, to support a factory opening in Turkey. Their union representatives talk of 'strike action' rather than the real cause of their unemployment. The working classes have borne the brunt of immigration, driving down wages, putting a strain on the NHS and housing, doing the jobs that the one million NEETs would have been capable of doing. It's just not disaffected Tories who support us.
Follow Janice Atkinson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/janiceukip
Bobby Friedman: Cameron Needs to Deal With Ukip, but He Should Stick to the Modernising Project
Janice Atkinson: Trade Relationship With Europe But Not Political Membership
Adam Forrest: Gay Marriage in 2013: Will the Church Be Left Behind by History?
In Northern Ireland in 1973, the DUP had 8 seats while the Ulster Unionist Party had 24 seats. No-one would have believed that they could become the main unionist party in Northern Ireland yet, a mere 9 years later they had 21 seats to the UUP's 26 and now have 38 seats to the UUP's 15.
There is nothing a strange as politics. Now of us know what the future holds!
The UK depends more and more on trade outside of the EU. The UK has no trade treaties with any country or trade bloc/customs union outside the EU.
This comment by the way for the basis of clarity is entirely about non-EU trade.
Now I am sure you know as a senior UKIP person how long it takes to negotiate trade treaties, for instance the negotiations with India have been going on since 2007, thankfully the EU got the trade tariffs down to 40% instead of 150%; so how does UKIP see the UK surviving outside the EU with no trade agreements/treaties in place?
I export to China and India and have spoken at length to officials in those countries regarding trade when I spoke about the WTO agreement they dismissed this. The WTO has no powers to enforce and has no problems with tariffs, quota's and protectionism.
If this is the case and from my personal research and several UK trade bodies agree then tell me how will UKIP protect jobs in the UK and support employers like myself for the 5 year period that will be needed to conclude trade negotiations with the BRIC's and the USA?
Nonsense ... the British workforce was undermined by the British work ethic. I remember when you had to beg a british tradesman to finish a job a week after the expected completion date ..... too many fag and tea breaks.
Should Labour have been closing borders tha same way other european countries did? YES, definitely
But would Ukip bring anything good to anyone in the UK: based on all they say and profess: never... except for deploring the immigration policy of labour, there is not one idea, not one comment that makes any sense
Unemployement is caused at the root by the change in technology that originated 30 years ago and is amplifying. Thinking that traditional political answer can address that is intellectually worthless and can only lead to more lies being spread...
Labour's immigration policy was catastrophic, they opened the flood gates and the Con/Lib Dems have left them wide open. Mass immigration is destroying Britain and will continue to do so under the 3 main parties.
Why should we have to build more houses and schools just for immigrants ? Why should we have to put up with all the extra crime ? Why should we have to pay billions in benefits to immigrants who have put nothing into the system ?
Hundreds of immigrants took part in the riots, some even trashed the houses they were given to live in.......is this the thanks we get for taking them in ?
Some control is needed before it's too late.
How can this lunacy be justified ?
According to the government, 11,000 foreign prisoners are in our jails costing the tax payer £500 million a year, and almost 4,000 foreign murderers, rapists and other violent criminals are walking the streets of Britain. They can't be kicked out because the EU says it would violate their human rights.
We've even got terrorists and religious extremists living here on benefits. These people hate the west and want to destroy everything we stand for, why do our governments stand for it ?
They British bulldog has now become a performing poodle controlled by the EU, is this what we want ?
Look up the stats, by whichever measure - apart from Little Englander/Daily Mail rubbish
This lady's article merely confirms the fact that UKIP is and will remain a niche party. The next general election will confirm it.
Is UKIP the political wing of the Daily Mail?
The Daily Mail will absolutely slam UKIP because their owners want a Tory victory and UKIP is a threat to that. They won't disagree with UKIP's barmy policies, they'll question the character of UKIP MEPs and Councillors.