iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jason Reed

GET UPDATES FROM Jason Reed
 

Disability Benefits: Why the UK Has to Reinvent the Workplace

Posted: 07/01/2013 00:00

"When you have your health, you have everything. When you do not have your health, nothing else matters at all."

- A quote that's so familiar that it's become seamless in our collective vernacular. As clichéd as the sentiment is, it may have lost it's visceral relevance.

As the UK hits the 'welfare cliff' with more and more people relying on food banks, and with the disabled still at the very real mercy of the now infamous ATOS 'assessment' process, there remains a rather large elephant in the room of disability welfare reforms.

There has been a projected image over the last few years that the UK's welfare culture has meant that there are many fraudulent cases, all of whom can play on the golf course daily whilst receiving a gross handout from the state for their chosen lifestyles of apathy. In truth, nothing could be further from the hyperbolic bubble that we've shrouded ourselves in. Despite only 0.5% of disability benefits being fraudulent, the cuts to the disabled is growing with alarming consequences. It is now commonplace to read of suicides, deaths and risible tales relating to the ATOS process.

There is, however, an area that we now must address with the severity that's needed to evoke a mood of change. I have previously blogged on the lack of understanding and opportunities that exist to those who have disabilities, and especially those who suffer from fluctuating illness, but as the cuts bite hard, there is still no attainable alternative to those on the receiving end of austerity.

To cite the personal perspective of M.E, Fibromyalgia, M.S, and similar illnesses that have no degree of constancy to the sufferer, it is a fundamental impossibility to conform to the nine to five workplace. By its very nature, chronic and fluctuating conditions prevent normality entirely, not to mention, dealing with constant agonising pain, fatigue and mental attrition is a full-time job in itself. Severe illness is indiscriminate, it can happen to anyone who's had misfortune in life. It remains a sobering fact that many people are simply not eligible to work.

But, there is also another, rather oblique, aspect to this large quandary. There are those with chronic illness whom are clearly capable of high achievement, those who have learned over a great period of time to seek autonomy through necessity - there are many with fluctuating illness that have personally sought productive outlets under their own auspices. The misnomer that we even have a benefit culture with disabled people ready to exploit and sit comfortably needs quashing. Make no mistake, the benefit system does not hand out much money at all to the individual, and it's a system full of stigma.

The unyielding reality is that there are hardly any resources or infrastructure to cater for those who wish to be self-reliant whilst still having to tread upon their own battle weary path of dealing with illness. We are able to cater for disabilities that have a degree of constancy, and yet no real effort has been made for those who's very existence is turbulent - with unreliability an inherent factor of fluctuating illness, this makes for a tumultuous and untenable mix for prospective employers and employees alike. We must think outside the box.

Through my public platforms such as the The Huffington Post UK, I've come to meet and speak to many who deal with debilitating illness on a daily basis, some are unable to even think about work, some are capable of intermediate activities, others positively seek work that conforms to their needs to no avail - task based work can often be achieved, but it has to be dictated by the circumstances of the individual, and once more, there are not many employers who are willing to take this punt, and who can blame them? If an employee cannot offer reliability in their working hours, what else is there? Moreover, the juggling act of the benefit system is also a factor: it's all or nothing, there's little intelligence within the system to allow for sporadic methods of earning.

Support groups such as the M.E Association are often the go-to place for those with nowhere to turn, and it doesn't take long to find examples of how there are a great deal of people who are all in the same boat of nonconformity. As we hit 2013 we must begin in our quest for work that suits patients' needs.

It can often be the case that arts and crafts provide solace. I've come to know many talented people: from dressmakers to writers, musicians to graphic designers, bakers to artists, these are areas that are often the hardest to break into. Working from home also provides possible alternatives, and yet the irony soon becomes apparent that these positions are equally as hard to find, and often only serve to provide menial tasks that pay a fabled pittance. Self-employment is an option, but this method of earning is often fraught with stress, long working hours and has its own pitfalls of unreliability.

With the modern world interconnected is there any excuse for such distinct lack of opportunities? Task-based over strict hour-based work ethics could be an achievable alternative if enough resources and thought were applied - we must begin to see the skills of individuals and learn to trust in unconventionality - high level mentoring would also be a welcome addition. Those who fight just to exist on a daily basis, through pain and personal hindrance, are often lateral thinkers; thinking outside the box is a necessitous process.

It's time we reinvent the workplace and provide real alternatives to those who have some capability to work, but it has to be on their terms - a more mutual, affable working condition owing to the very nature of inconsistent health. We must have a collective empathy with those whom are simply not eligible to work; to reiterate, we're all but one of life's hardships from having our world rocked to its foundations, and we're running out of safety nets. If we readdress our working practices for those that suffer from chronic illness and disease, we could also engender a more welcoming, stress-free environment that would have a wider benefit. For too long fear has pervaded the 'back to work' notion of the disabled due to its undiscerning, unrelenting practices. We have to begin to present overarching and reasonable options for those most vulnerable, and we must deal with the entrenched financial wilderness that many now face.

 

Follow Jason Reed on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jasontron

FOLLOW HEALTH NEWS
"When you have your health, you have everything. When you do not have your health, nothing else matters at all." - A quote that's so familiar that it's become seamless in our collective vernacular. ...
"When you have your health, you have everything. When you do not have your health, nothing else matters at all." - A quote that's so familiar that it's become seamless in our collective vernacular. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 50
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:29 PM on 01/13/2013
Thankyou for this post. I have hydrocephalus (fluid on the brain) and usually have at least one brain surgery a year....sometimes three or four. Holding down a job is a nightmare so I am self-employed and work from home. But even now, that I'm having a 'quiet' few months on the brain-surgery front and can do some part-time work, I can barely afford the rent, let alone bills and council tax, let alone food. This government is a very, very dangerous one. It's truly scary to listen to the 'skivers', 'scroungers' and 'curtain-twitchers' rhetoric that they're throwing out constantly. The fact that 93% of housing benefit claimants actually work seems to escape them. Something needs to be done to stop their relentless attack on the most vulnerable which to be honest echoes the early actions of a certain political party in the 1940's.
05:43 PM on 01/10/2013
Very Well Put. I have a spinal Injury with severe nerve damage to the Left Ulna Nerve Branch. I don't know what the day is going to be like until I wake up. Even then the day can change at any moment. I want to work or make a living some other way other than the accepting the pittance I have to live on. However as you pointed out in the article, even on-line work requires a specific number of hours each day! If the employer would change that to over 7 or even 14 days, the work suddenly becomes more viable. The DWP transferred me from Higher rate IB to ESA last November, 1st they found me fit for work, then with the help of my local MP and the legal medical report stating I am 60% disabled for life and it is highly unlikely that I will ever return to any meaningful remunerative employment, have been put in the WRAG group. The nice lady at the Job Centre told me not to worry about any of the conditions and to go home. So she can see I can't work in a 9 to 5 job.
I relate to Ian James1 on the pills to dull the pain and then you forget what you were doing.
06:07 PM on 01/10/2013
Thought I should add how I got here.

I went to work one day in Dec 2007 and though I didn't know it yet that one day would change my life forever. What at the time I thought to be a pulled muscle from almost dropping a 150lb flower pot my boss asked me to help him move, turned into Major Spinal Surgery, titanium inserts and severe nerve damage effecting my upper left side including the functional use of my left arm and hand.

It can happen to anyone, at any time and then you to can be called a SCROUNGER!
I am not afraid of my disability but I am afraid of how I am going to pay the bills.
11:47 AM on 01/08/2013
Thank you, for a well written piece that puts my own position into words far better than I could, I was excluded from work as a result of an industrial injury, that has left me significantly restricted and with fluctuating symptoms I'm now reliant on benefits. I want to work... but I cannot offer any employer "reliability", I can offer truth, loyalty, honesty and my best efforts.. but sorry you can't rely on me.... Most days my medicine blunts or dulls my pain... and I'd probably get two hours of productive work in an 9-5 8 hour regular day... 4 in a 24 hour day.. some days I don't know what day of the week it actually is , thanks to prn doses of opiates for the severe pain. So if you need regular hours forget it.

But the other side of this coin. I paid in for years , and years. I had no choice, PAYE and NI . well now I'm claiming on my insurance... just like you would claim if your house burned down or your car was stolen.. So IDS and your supporters, GO F;;; YOURSELVES, because I don't feel guilty, getting less than a third of what you claimed in expenses to pay your wife to look after your diary...

MOST DISABLED PEOPLE I KNOW WHAT TO WORK...
11:56 AM on 01/08/2013
Oh if any employer has some job, say £10 per hour 20 hours a week over 7x 24 hour days, very flexible ,working from home... only occasionally let you down... just enough to replace my benefits and pay my taxes and NI ...Let me know. I'll let you have my CV.

PS No Spammers need respond.

Would have included this in the above piece, but exceeded word count.
09:35 AM on 01/08/2013
If Lewisham Hospital is forced to close the A & E department it will be a total travesty of a hospital, and patients, being punished by keeping within its budget. This has come about because 2 other hospitals, nowhere near the Lewisham area, have gone into the red and we patients who have come to rely on our LOCAL hospital, will definitely suffer.
I was an inpatient 4 times in 2012 and all those 'visits' were on an emergency basis. My carers and people who help me are all in the local area and I would not encourage them to travel far to help me. This is just not fair.
02:30 AM on 01/08/2013
l met recently with the chief constable of our local police force. The issue was my being blackmailed as a registered disabled person , with limited mobility and living on my own by one of his senior officers and this CC writing to me in a strong fashion backing this senior offices tirade and threats at me. I was lucky to have my helper of over twelve years attend to enable this meeting. Neither myself or my helper was prepared for the discrimination exhibited against me and this CC referring to my helper as my COLLEAGUE AND ADVISOR, when they are no such thing. I am thoroughly discusted that someone who fronts a whole area police force , can tread so easily on any dignity or rights to the existance of myself and while a criminal matter for which there is no time limits is still being investigated by this CC's force and that is related to the matter of the attempt to blackmail me and in effect stop me receiving justice. If there is no understanding from a person in such a senior position , then what else can we expect from his underlings. I fear that vulnerable persons will continue to be ousted and josled into believing their have no worth , because people like this CC have absolutely no concience
10:33 AM on 01/08/2013
"The issue was my being blackmailed as a registered disabled person " What is all this about? Have they lost their marbles? Are they trying to keep you quiet about something?? Take the bullets and fight on, I know your very upset but slow down and form your attack properly with cunning and attack from the side, not head on. Use their superiors against them.... carefully.
04:59 PM on 01/08/2013
I was attacked and raped in 1999,Lincolnshire Police did not file my statement. I fought for 15 months.l was phoned by a Chief Inspector due to retire and given a verabal apology. My solicitors were involved, and did not get me an order of safety ( l was threatened repeatedly). It now appears the police and solicitors was pre-planned and a massive corruption and also the putting of false evidence into court to mislead over land and property that l own.The senior police officer who after l had contacted the CPS , was asigned to investigate, then attempted to blackmail me if l pushed for it to become a criminal matter. The Chief Constabel wrote saying he backed the senior officer. I wrote to the IPCC and they upheld my complaint and l was asked to attend a meeting with the Chief Constable and ACC Bannister ( check out his background on the internet!!). I am registered disabled , with limited mobility and my helper took me to this meeting.I explained that my helper is my helper for my disabilities,not a partner,not a lover, not an advisor and does not live with me . Yet this Chief Constable treated me as incapable and referred to my helper as my "colleague" and my "advisor".My helper worried for me wanted to leave, the Chief Constable was pleased at this and said l better listen to my advisor!!!!
11:35 PM on 01/07/2013
So why wasn't I up-front with my employer about my condition?

Firstly because they didn't need to know - as above in my circumstances I was judged purely on output - if they were happy what does it matter if I am ill?

Secondly because I needed to get a foot in the door in order to prove myself capable and in an employers market I wouldn't make it past the first CV scan. This is one area that might be addressed, though I don't know how

Thirdly, because my view is that thinking of me as healthy they attribute any delays, absences or cock-ups to human nature as they would for any other employee. If they thought of me as an "ill" person then every failing would immediately be attributed to the illness *even if it was nothing to do with it* (all employees make mistakes and have bad days).

Essentially I withheld the information (to be clear they did not ask, I didn't volunteer) in order to get a fair crack of the whip - but is that really the way it needs to be, or is there a way to convince companies that *some* chronically ill can actually be productive and worth employing?

I may be doing my employers a disservice- they may have given me a chance to prove myself even if I had disclosed my condition, but frankly I didn't and don't dare - there are not many jobs that are so flexible even in
10:40 AM on 01/08/2013
You have ME, deadlines and stress are not good for you. I know its hard but while your resting, try and think of anything you could do that's not stressful. Yes it may mean less money, but being un-employable is the same wage. If you cant get a part time job with a local employer, try and create a job for yourself that you can manage. I wont suggest any as I will not want to offend but I firmly believe (no there's nothing wrong with me by the way) that everyone can accomplish something being of benefit to themselves and others.
12:36 PM on 01/08/2013
Um, as that seems to be in response to me, did you actually read my post? I am working, I am earning, I am lucky....
11:30 PM on 01/07/2013
Chronically ill with ME for 6 years. When I got ill was running a business but had to close that, tried freelancing but could not be reliable enough for tight deadlines. I was lucky enough to find a home-based job that I could do. I had to reduce my salary expectations by 40%, but it was a job I could do in 10-15 productive hours a week while delivering a level my employer considered acceptable for a full week.

I am fully aware how lucky I am - I happened to have high level professional skills in a field where remote working and overall output rather than "bum on seat" was the key measure. I am not suggesting that all people with chronic illness could do the same, even if they were as lucky as me to find such a job.

However would it not be waste of my knowledge and experience if I was not employed at all because I could not be in front of my desk at precise hours? Anecdotal yes, but I cannot be the only person in a similar position and if there is some way to make it easier for people like me to find and fulfil such jobs that has to be a good thing?

I accept that many jobs are not suited to this approach and many employers would not consider it, but I do not believe the wholly black vision of some earlier comments that *no* employer would consider it.
11:45 PM on 01/07/2013
Thank you for sharing your story. It is inspiring.

In an ideal world is precisely what the Work Related Actvity Group should be aimed at acheiving - allowing people the opportunity of self-sufficiency within the limits of their capabilities. Of course instead in this far from ideal world we have the obscenity of potentially indefinite Workfare.

http://wowpetition.com/
11:17 PM on 01/07/2013
Sick and Disabled people need support not constant assessment, reassessment and appeals. If most people were aware of the true horror facing many sick and disabled people in this country it simply could not continue. Sign http://wowpetition.com/ to protest!
06:16 PM on 01/07/2013
Surely the area too concentrate on first is the able bodied get them working then if a sick person is capable of some work they should be considered also .The chronically ill should be treated with the greatest of respect not like ATOS do their approach is only financally driven the more they sign off fit the bigger their payday.
04:56 PM on 01/07/2013
The benefits system makes chronic illness, chronically worse.

When a good week can have you viewed and reported as a fraud, at risk of loosing your entire income and the roof over your head....

eventually, after months of wrangling agree that you are not fraudulently in receipt of benefit, and you may get your money back-dated....

Bank charges, extra costs incurred will take years of extra scrimping to crawl out from under. Chronic illness will have worsened, due to inabilities to afford the extras (like heat), special diets, supplements, and the numerous aids, extras that keep your head above water.

Volunteer to man a helpline@ home a few hours a week, will likely have your disabling chronic health brought into question.

If the disabled benefit scroungers were well, they would be out in the streets of our cities everyday, but they are not, are they, so where are they?

They are at home, trying to keep warm, minimise symptoms and pain, Trying hard to get well, or not worsen their condition or increase their dependency on others.

Embarrassed and often humiliated by the never ending need to clarify the level of personal aid that they may require, the indignity of all their most personal of concerns being laid out in front of stranger after stranger.

Many will conclude suicide is best option, rather than face the inhumane destruction of their desire to live, in a battle that will most likely see them homeless and destitute.
05:28 PM on 01/07/2013
Well said, MEfly.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jason Reed
09:27 PM on 01/07/2013
Great comment, thanks for this.

As you say, there are a great deal many aspects of the system that perpetuate one's illness. There is no intelligence to personal circumstances. This does warrant an article all of its own I feel.

Once more, thank you for conveying this neglected aspect.
04:28 PM on 01/07/2013
AS a long time advocate for jobs for people with disabilities in the US; I find that employers do not I repeat DO NOT want to have people with issues interuppting their businesses. My son was given an job at the same company I worked for was a Fortune 500. Once he learned the routine and I had to take a leave of absence. in which he did very well taking on the role with little or no help. Instead of working him into a job 2 years later they let him go. 8 years later he has a nice resume and work experience but, no one wants to work with some one theywould have to really train for a position. I call this lazyness in the business secter. He is not retadted so he knows why he cannot get a job. I ask what kind of quality of life is that for a 35 year old. So as far as the UK goes I think you will find this almost everywhere. The stigma of anyone with disablitites is still TABOO and companies do not want to be bothered!
05:37 PM on 01/07/2013
Plus the added cost of wheelchair ramps and modified toilet facilities. Remploy was well intended following WW2, but during the New Labour years it became unproductive and a complete waste of space. Free market capitalism doesn't care about the disabled and or training the unemployed, all it cares about is making fat profits for its shareholders and its Lib/Lab/Con donors.
06:48 PM on 01/07/2013
I was aware of that 30 years ago and so really in the long run these children/adults are mistakes and who cares. Until one of the rich has a mistake and they ship them off and pay thousands of $$$$$ to keep them from public view. To every parent I have trained I have laid out the reallity of life because no one told me that at 3 my son would live with me or a family member forever because these are mistakes that the public looks at with distane. The ones who want to do something for us have no idea they are fighting a losing battle with the capitalists.
04:13 PM on 01/07/2013
Jason Reed, has shown in his artical how very little in knowledge he really has about Disability issues, and Disabled People in general.
So go and bury your Head Jason.
04:48 PM on 01/07/2013
Can you elucidate? How does Reed show "how very little in knowledge he really has about Disability issues, and Disabled People in general"?

Genuine question.
05:05 PM on 01/07/2013
Reed said's Quote; "There are those with chronic illness whom are clearly capable of high achievement".

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Genuine Answer.
Wrong, for to have any Chronic Condition by its nature, limits ANY HIGH achievement because if you remove the word Chronic, then the Person in Question would be able, and capable to achieve far MORE.
Therefore, in the Case of this Person with a Chronic Condition their achievement is Low, when compared to what they might have attained with NO Chronic Medical Condition's.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jason Reed
09:24 PM on 01/07/2013
Thanks for the comments, broncohardman, sorry you felt I dealt with the issue flippantly. I would like to offer to you that I have put in quite a few disclaimers in this piece about how there are many who are not able to work. For example:

"By its very nature, chronic and fluctuating conditions prevent normality entirely, not to mention, dealing with constant agonising pain, fatigue and mental attrition is a full-time job in itself. Severe illness is indiscriminate, it can happen to anyone who's had misfortune in life. It remains a sobering fact that many people are simply not eligible to work."

- and there are many more that I also interjected with in that tone. I know many people who stand no chance of even self-maintenance let alone work.

And just to make you aware, I’ve been classified severely disabled since the age of 8, so this does come from quite a personal perspective. If you can offer feedback on where you felt I’ve been wrong or insensitive, please do let me know.
10:11 PM on 01/07/2013
Thank you for your reply Jason.
But yet again I must disagree with what you call disclaimers, whereby for example you say; " fluctuating conditions prevent normality entirely", for if anything the opposite is more truly the Case since you are getting into a Grey - Area whereby the word "Fluctuation" can mean all things to all men.
This is why I have moved my position to hard edge of using the term Chronic in ALL my replies, since the word Chronic means normally permanently in Medical Term's.

Dealing with constant agonising pain again in the Chronic sense is indeed also a reason for being in permanent pain, while having a constant agonising pain due to some way you move, or some action you undertake depends upon the limitations of your Actions, whereby again someone standing may be in constant agonising pain, while should this same person be doing something sitting down this pain will subside, or is able to be kept under control with medication.

A person may be fully paralysed from the waste down, but is still able to do a Desk - Job sitting in a Wheelchair, while someone with Chronic Lumber Disc Disease may just be able to walk, but still be in Chronic Pain permanently, and when seated.

Other examples of why Chronic conditions are first and foremost the main reasons why many People cannot Work, and NOT just because someone is classed as being Disabled from doing a certain task, even if overall limited..
03:59 PM on 01/07/2013
I do love this term, - "Thinking outside the Box", which suggests somehow that their are REAL Answers awaiting elsewhere, when all that is really being implied is that down through the years everybody has got the previous Fact's wrong.

Anyone that can find nothing else to do, but too suggest that they have spoken to many People with Disabilities, and Health issues are a very sad lot indeed, for they somehow think that Medical Specialist were dreaming when they told someone that they will NOT be able to Work again.

The Disabled therefore, have to suffer all kinds of make - believe scenarios whereby the writer of these Blog - Stories have, and show very little intellect of understanding the complete nature of many given manners of Disabilities, for these Story Writers themselves are usually able - bodied, but they somehow seem to think that due to a Government Austerity programme, they too must engage with trying to give the impression that a Magic - Cure for many Disabled People is in some form of Employment unto which many of those Disabled have previously been told to avoid from working due to the FACT that by engaging in such tasks will only increase their overall levels of Disability.

Many able - bodied Huff Story Writers can write all they like about what someone else with any Disability they think can do outside the Box, but many Disabled People live life everyday firmly inside a very restricted unhealthy Box indeed.
04:52 PM on 01/07/2013
Ok - yes I understand your concerns here.
02:21 PM on 01/07/2013
Furthermore failed to be considered is the side affects from medication and the ability to work, such as drowsiness, inability to concentrate, nausea and so on! There is a lack of holistic therapies unless one is able to afford to pay for them, like you say Jason it is not a case of people not wanting to do it more of a case of not being able to!
04:51 PM on 01/07/2013
Most large Companies send all their prospective Employee's to be checked - out by their own Medical Doctor's, and Advisers, and it is very unlikely that anyone with any Chronic Pre - Standing Medical History will be selected to Work for many, if ANY Employer's.

It is therefore, very easy for any perspective Employer to get hold of your Pre - Existing Medical History from your GP, as normally you will have to give this permission of Prior Consent on any Job Application Form.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jason Reed
10:21 PM on 01/07/2013
You make a very much needed point, one that I did edit out if I may confess due to the need for brevity. The extra caveat of medication, side-effects, etc etc - this is wholly affecting to not only the individual, but also prospective co-workers. There's simple health & safety aspects at work. You make an example of yet another variable that we must add in this quandary.
02:11 PM on 01/07/2013
There is a huge problem with the practicality of getting people on disability benefits into work to be sure. There are a shortage of jobs as it is. If there are no jobs for people to go for, they will remain unemployed. In short this is a problem that cannot be solved until there is a real growth in the jobs market.

Unfortunately, government attempts to reduce spend on this stuff usually ends up being an unpleasant blunderbus approach. The people who often end up having their benefits cut are often those who need them most but who don't know how to work the system. The few people that are manipulating the system to their advantage will continue to get benefits because they know what forms to fill out and what answers to give - i.e. they know very well what boxes need ticking and they are happy to keep ticking them. That is because the system is ultimately administered by inefficient bureaucrats who make decisions by numbers rather than by common sense.

I am afraid that the only effect tighter government rules will have in this area a) won't make a huge difference to public finances at the end of the day and b) will take money away from a lot of needy people.
04:33 PM on 01/07/2013
The main problem here is that MOST People with Chronic Health issues, and Disabilities have permanent conditions that at best they can only manage, and keep stable, while should they NOT engage in ANY Work activities, for should they then they will in turn only make their Medical Conditions far worse indeed.
Medication, on the other hand can only work against pain, while it is totally pointless to try and do something that increases the levels of pain, only to find that NO Medication is effectively working.

On the Job's front, you are fully correct about the impracticality of ANY Employer to sign - on any Disabled Person, when they know full well that any involvement to be seeing someone struggle to do something will cause both the Disabled ( Employee ), and perhaps another Third - Party to have a further Accident.

This of course will be expensive for any Employer's Medical Insurance to cover.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jason Reed
10:45 PM on 01/07/2013
I share your concerns. Is it wrong that I look predominately to the private, philanthropic sector to make changes to this whole problem. I don't want to publicly proclaim that I lack faith in Governmental sectors to make changes, but...
11:15 PM on 01/07/2013
Indeed.
In the round, the Government have now fully abdicated the States duty, of care, and responsibility towards Welfare Claimants Medical Check's by furnishing them out to Private for Profit Medical companies like Atos, whom have NO responsibility whatsoever for their actions towards the electorate.

So whether indeed you, or I like it or NOT this is the outcome of this Coalition Governments faith in what has in many Cases previously been looked into by fully trained NHS Medical Specialist, and by the former routine of DHSS / DSS, and DWP Medical Assessors alike, for how many times do you personally believe that someone already assessed as having a Permanent Chronic Medical condition, or disorder should be recalled just so that a Private for Profit Medical organisation can mull over the competency's of proven medical evidence fully attained by trained NHS Medical Specialise, and Professional's???

These are your changes that have already been made and have come to past, for the worse.