Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Griffin

GET UPDATES FROM John Griffin
 

Cycling - A Deadly Serious Issue

Posted: 20/04/2012 15:45

My foreword in Addison Lee's magazine Add Lib, has caused quite a storm amongst the Twitter community, and I'm glad it has. In the article, I argue for compulsory training and insurance for London's bicycle owners and I still stand by my contention. About one cyclist is killed on London's roads every month and countless others horribly injured. If the article causes a debate around cycle safety, and perhaps saves some lives, bring it on.

As things stand, anyone can just jump on a bike and you see them all the time on London's roads, wearing flip flops, T-shirts, a pair of headphones on, tapping their fingers on the handlebar to the beat of the music. We've all had to take evasive action as these kinds of cyclists tear through red lights, without a thought for their, or anyone else's safety, and its these kinds of cyclists (a minority I should add), that cause problems for everyone - road users, pedestrians and cyclists alike.

I regularly hear stories from my drivers about accidents they have witnessed involving cyclists and we have all seen the white bikes that are positioned across the capital, as memorials and reminders of the dangers. These accidents are horrific, devastating events, both for the cyclists involved and the drivers of the vehicles, who have to cope with a terrible burden for the rest of their lives.

A few years ago, almost every school child did a cycling proficiency test, which involved negotiating their way around bollards and learning the Highway Code. What has happened to that, and why is it not on the agenda any more?

In other cities, like Milton Keynes, there are fantastic cycle lanes, but this is just not practical for London. What is practical, however, is to do what we can to protect cyclists. I support the instalment of Trixi mirrors at traffic lights. They allow HGV drivers to see cyclists alongside them and seem like a great idea. And as I stated in the original article, I back proper training for all cyclists and a legal requirement to be vigilant at all times (for example by banning earphone use by cyclists).

Every accident is different, but what we can do is reduce the risk factors for cyclists. I am a cyclist. I have my Boris Bike key and I take cycling very seriously like the majority of cyclists out there. It's without a doubt a dangerous pursuit, and constant vigilance and a level of proven competency on the roads must be a part of that.

At Addison Lee, we have a fleet of cycle couriers and our driver training also ensures that they are aware of other road users, including cyclists. It also requires that they are courteous and respectful to cyclists at all times.

Cycling is a deadly serious issue and lives are at stake. There have been huge campaigns recently to encourage cycling, but not so much in terms of improving safety and awareness for cyclists.

I'm glad that the issue is being debated. If anyone has more ideas for improving safety for cyclists, I would be delighted to hear them. In the meantime, I will continue calling for compulsory training and compulsory insurance for bicycle users.

 
FOLLOW UK POLITICS
My foreword in Addison Lee's magazine Add Lib, has caused quite a storm amongst the Twitter community, and I'm glad it has. In the article, I argue for compulsory training and insurance for London's b...
My foreword in Addison Lee's magazine Add Lib, has caused quite a storm amongst the Twitter community, and I'm glad it has. In the article, I argue for compulsory training and insurance for London's b...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
02:07 AM on 04/25/2012
Dear John give the world the safest taxis ever by accepting & properly registering passengers hailing for cabs in London. TY
10:47 PM on 04/23/2012
If Griffin cared about cycle safety (and not the risk of losing money from a boycott), not only would he have not promised to indemnify any of his indentured drivers from invading the bus lane, he'd look at those youtube videos of his drivers and do something about their standard of driving.
06:00 PM on 04/22/2012
Griffin, you appear to peddling backwards at quite a pace. Your first piece was essentially a call to run cyclists off the road. Now you are concerned for our safety. Thing is you don't make much sense. You want cyclists to be trained but you don't train your own cycle couriers. You like the cycle lanes in Milton Keynes but cant imagine them in London. You infer it would be good to give cyclists more road space but you are tying to get your taxis using bus lanes. You don't like cyclists who break the rules but are quite happy to encourage your own drives to flout the law. There is a word for businessmen like you; people who talk before they think - you are a Ratner.
03:15 PM on 04/22/2012
Mr Griffin, I am glad that you mentioned that Addison Lee has a number of 'self-employed sub-contractors' who ride bicycles (otherwise known as bicycle messengers or cycle couriers). You will, of course, be able to assure us that these sub-contractors are all covered by 3rd party liability insurance, and have received appropriate cycle training from a TfL approved cycle trainer?

I would be particularly interested in knowing where your cycle couriers obtained their 3rd party liability insurance, as all the popular cycle insurance policies specifically exclude 'working cyclists' from 3rd party liability, and a number of my acquaintances are cycle couriers, and are keen to obtain such cover.
05:13 PM on 04/22/2012
AddisonLeeCabs

John Griffin's take on his controversial column: http://t.co/6W00nS4p
01:52 PM on 04/22/2012
John Griffin, if you want to safe Addisson Lee, come out on your bike, cycle in bus lanes and get your PR people to praise your experience, what you have learnt cycling in London and how that will change your drivers' training.

I hope that ministries will cancel contract with Addisson Lee. In the mean time I've signed the e-petition to withdraw Addison Lee's license: http://iitm.be/AddLeeLic
10:18 AM on 04/21/2012
Mr. Griffin, you risk being ignored entirely by raising entirely irrelevant issues about the clothing and footwear choices of cyclists. You risk coming across as the sort of person who believes a cyclist deserves whatever injury he or she receives if they're not dressed to some unstated standard set by you.

And I think the burden is *entirely* on you to specify at what age this compulsory training and compulsory insurance kicks in.

If you believe even small children must be compelled to undergo formal training and to be insured, it's up to you to say so. It's up to you to make your proposal seem practical.
11:25 PM on 04/20/2012
I don't know where to start with you John. Your bizarre finger pointing at people that cycle in flip-flop and (god forbid) t-shirts. Or your your attempt to say that you take cycling seriously. Instead I just hope you read the Highway Code and understand rules 163 and 213. And by the way, why are the roads congested? Hint: It's not bikes.
11:18 PM on 04/20/2012
Your claim to want to protect cyclists is utterly implausible - you want publicity for your company more like.
But to take what you've written at face value - the idea that cyclists' safety needs to be improved by training the cyclists is laughable. I have held a motor cycle driving licence for 42 years, a car licence for 40, I have my Advanced motorist as well. And when I ride a bicycle, as I have done for 50+ years, no amount of cycle-training will protect me from the prime cause of every near-accident I have ever had and that is drivers' lack of attention. The reason the government spends scarce resources to appeal to drivers to think of cyclists and motor cycles is because they know that the prime cause of accidents with cyclists is the car driver, not the cyclist.
Next time you want to promote your company best choose your topics to blog on with a little more care because you're coming out of this one looking callous, arrogant and ill-informed.
11:04 PM on 04/20/2012
I would also agree with The police officers comments and findings. When taxi drivers ALL are calm, considerate drivers, with care and attention to ALL other road users, then you can come on here Mr John Griffing and spount this absolute rubbish.
How often do you see Taxis with cosmetic damage to the vehicle. I have no end of friends who have been involved in RTAs with Taxi drivers, and personally I often find them one of the worst road users groups on our roads today.
You want to come after the cyclists and the way we move about, get your own house in order first!
10:48 PM on 04/20/2012
Crank
07:12 PM on 04/22/2012
By this argument we should insist on helmets, hi viz, training and compulsory insurance for the vast number of people who can just jump out there and start ... walking.

Get real, you provide the drivers (who pay you handsomely to rent the cars) with a device that kills people more frequently and effectively than a gun. With a gun there is substantial presumed liability, both on the user and the owner of the gun, when that gun is abused, and should that gun actually kill or maim then the law both criminal and civil holds that presumption of liability. It is about time we did the same for motor vehicles.

Thank you John Griffin for allowing us to really open up this debate, I just hope you can handle the liability encumbent on you through your operation of your LPHC fleet, especially with your apparent official instruction to break the law, to those driving your vehicles.
07:45 PM on 04/20/2012
Back to Black Cabs for me then...Deleted Addison Lee app from my iPhone....I've been in enough Addison Lee cars to have witnessed first hand who causes the accidents....
09:11 AM on 04/21/2012
Get the hailo app
https://www.hailocab.com/
07:24 PM on 04/20/2012
You, sir are an idiot.
I am a class 1 police driver and motorcyclist; I am also a daily long distance commuter cyclist. Courts accept my opinion as an expert on driver behaviour an in my expert opinion it is the majority of your drivers that are in dire need of training.
I pay income tax and council tax and own a car. So I "pay for the roads" too.
When I choose to cycle I am still "paying for the roads" yet free up space for motor vehicle.
Your argument is an attempt to improve your company’s commercial position. So stop dressing it up as a provoking a debate on cycle/road safety.
Vehicle regularly kill cyclists, cyclists do not kill drivers.
03:33 PM on 04/22/2012
No, but cyclists on the pavements regularly injure and even kill pedestrians. They should all carry insurance..
and you should know as i do......
02:09 PM on 04/23/2012
Cyclists "regularly injure and even kill pedestrians" !! What is your concept of "regularly". Once a year? Once a decade? Besides cycling on the pavement is illegal and cyclists should be prosecuted if caught cycling there. The AL idiot is asking that his cabs be legally allowed to plough up and down one of the few safe(r) areas for cyclists in London. Cyclists pay loads of tax towards the roads they use, take cars off the road and reduce congestion, exercise and put less of a burden on the NHS that they pay for through their tax and reduce pollution. They pose little threat to cars and pedestrians (unlike cars). If you require cyclists to carry insurance, should pedestrians be similarly covered for when they cross the road? Your views, like those of the AL chairman are pure bigotry.
07:04 PM on 04/20/2012
A cyclist or pedestrian hit by a vehicle will come off worst. No amount of training will save cyclists from the thousands of reckless/dangerous and careless drivers out there. It's time the driving community ceased it's victim-blaming culture and took responsibility for driving tons of metal at speed on our roads.
06:39 PM on 04/20/2012
I ride a bicycle.
I have passed my advanced driving test.
This makes me more trained than most of your drivers.
06:01 PM on 04/20/2012
"If anyone has more ideas for improving safety for cyclists, I would be delighted to hear them"

Lets think about that -- instructing your drivers to obey the rules of the road would be a start
- not jumping red lights
- not obstructing ASZ's (advance stop areas - designed to make junctions safer for cyclists)
- not using their mobile phones while driving
- ensuring they pass cyclists at a safe distance
- being courteous to other road users (cyclists/pedestrians/other vehicles)
- Keeping your drivers out of bus lanes

You could start by having a policy of proper response to complaints about your drivers - perhaps financial penalties where other road users provide you with evidence of infractions?
06:35 PM on 04/20/2012
I am glad to hear you're a cyclist Mr Griffin, although from the look of things it's been a while since you did any serious training! Seriously, the points you raise suggest to me that it's been a long time since you were on a bike as you appear totally clueless about the issues.
02:30 AM on 04/21/2012
The REAL problem is bad Cyclist of ALL Ages, since,
- you don't need to have a Valid MOT Certificate, to pass any Cycle as being Road - Worthy.
- nor, do you require any Valid Cycling Licence.
- nor, are you required to take out any kinds of Accident Insurance
- nor, do you have to Pass any form of Driving - Test.
- nor, are you required to have your Cycle registered.
- neither, do you require to have any type of Medical - Test.
- There are NO Starting Age - Limits to either Owning, or Riding a Cycle.
- you are NOT forbidden from riding either in Park's, or upon Pavement's.
11:21 PM on 04/22/2012
Law deals with threats not prejudices. All of the above would only be necessary if cycles weighed around half a ton, took up 8 to 10 cu m of road space, congested our cities, could travel at over 30mph and were directly responsible for 2000 deaths and 24,000 injuries a year. But they don't.

just to note,unless its shared use it is absolutely illegal to ride on a sidewalk pavement (an no most cyclists don't_
06:26 PM on 04/27/2012
And yet despite all this, cyclists pretty much never kill anyone on the roads.