Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Wight

GET UPDATES FROM John Wight
 

The Tory Attacks on the Unemployed Constitute a Hate Crime

Posted: 11/01/2013 14:09

The assault on the unemployed by the government constitutes a hate crime. In fact, the cynical attempt to stigmatise, demonise, and dehumanise millions of people up and down the country, regardless of their personal or individual circumstances, surely ranks as one of the most vicious and brutal acts of any British government in living memory. It leaves us in no doubt that in 2013 the nation is being governed by a clutch of extreme right wing, rich, privileged, dangerous sociopaths, people who are completely out of touch with reality and whose conception of fairness is founded in Darwin's theory of natural selection.

Placing aside for the moment the false premise upon which the reductive and simplistic shirkers v strivers mantra is predicated - i.e. the fact that 70% of those who will suffer as a result of the government's Welfare Reform Bill are in work - it is the lie attached to the perception that everyone who is unemployed has chosen to be and/or remain so as a lifestyle choice. Making this attack on the most vulnerable and powerless section of the population even more vile is that it comes in the midst of the worst economic recession since the 1930s, one that has decimated the jobs market and which has been made worse by the policy by the extreme, nay religious obsession with implementing austerity by Cameron and co in response. Indeed to describe what they are doing as an economic policy is to ascribe dignity to what in truth amounts to a mass experiment in human despair.

It is difficult, even when trying to step into their shoes, to understand what the coalition front bench thinks will be achieved with what can only be adjudged as a declaration of class war. I mean, do they believe that the millions of people they have blithely written off as 'shirkers' will suddenly scurry around and secure employment, thus saving the taxpayer the millions they are accused of stealing? Do they believe their hate campaign will help the untold thousands of the children of those unemployed 'shirkers'? Or are they fully aware that the stress and sense of worthlessness already felt by the unemployed will now be increased, leading to a spike in incidents of suicide, domestic violence, mental illness, and the various other maladies that are connected to poverty?

If the former, it means they are too ignorant to govern the country, while if the latter it means they are too wicked. Perhaps it is a combination of both.

The economic logic behind austerity remains as flawed now as it was when first announced by the coalition. Rather than understand the deficit as a consequence of a global recession decimating demand in the economy, with a sharp fall in tax revenues due to a sharp rise in unemployment, the government is intent on deepening the same cycle by introducing drastic cuts in spending in the forlorn hope that the private sector will invest and create new jobs to replace those lost. But with a lack of demand for goods and services, the private sector is refusing to invest. The most obvious example of this is the banking sector's continuing refusal to lend, despite repeated pleas by the government, and despite being bailed out by the UK taxpayer to the tune of tens of billions of pounds over the past four years.

It is here that, when it comes to the vacuum left by the lack of private sector investment, the government's role as the investor of last resort is desperately required. The reintroduction of demand into an economy suffering a crisis of under-consumption is needed as a matter of urgency, yet instead this Tory-led coalition remains determined to continue down the path of austerity even in the face of the fact it isn't working.

But rather than admit this and change tact, instead it has turned its guns increasingly on the poor and unemployed. It is a recipe for social unrest, which promises refractory consequences for society in general, including the rich friends of the Tories, people for whom recession remains nothing more than a word in the dictionary.

Malcolm X once made the point that "Usually when people are sad, they don't do anything. They just cry over their condition. But when they get angry, they bring about change."

For increasing numbers of people in Britain in 2013, sadness and despair over their condition will inevitably give way to anger. When it does, and when this anger reaches the point of critical mass, the blowback that ensues is anyone's guess.

One thing we do know - every day that this government of the rich, for the rich, and by the rich is in power is a day too many.

 

Follow John Wight on Twitter: www.twitter.com/johnwight1

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
The assault on the unemployed by the government constitutes a hate crime. In fact, the cynical attempt to stigmatise, demonise, and dehumanise millions of people up and down the country, regardless of...
The assault on the unemployed by the government constitutes a hate crime. In fact, the cynical attempt to stigmatise, demonise, and dehumanise millions of people up and down the country, regardless of...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 60
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treborc
once Labour now none voter...
12:44 PM on 01/24/2013
Tory, New labour, Newer labour the rhetoric is always work shy scroungers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:05 AM on 01/21/2013
One thing we do know - every day that this government of the rich, for the rich, and by the rich is in power is a day too many. Couldn't have put it any better myself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treborc
once Labour now none voter...
10:59 AM on 02/16/2013
Which party are you talking about the rich Tory leader, the richer Liberal leader or the rich Labour leader, all three are Millionaires all given money by parents none are self made
06:08 PM on 01/19/2013
So this is the John Wight who is member of the Socialist Unity Network which originated in the Socialist Alliance. They were also involved in setting up the Respect Party whose most prominent member is that paragon of balanced politics, George Galloway. Wight's views are therefore about as 'moderate' and as far to the left as those of Mussolini's were to the right. I don't think for one moment that he cares more about the fate of the working classes than the Tory party members he castigates as evil - don't his words equally qualify as a hate crime on those grounds? He is just trying to score political points and stir up hatred and unrest. Many in the working classes see people on disability allowance who are capable of work. What is the problem with 'helping' them back into the job market? And how is that hardworking Poles and Lithuanians can travel over 1000 miles to find work in this country but the out-of-work here cannot go a couple of hundred for the same job? I expect Wight's answer would be that the Eastern Europeans are prepared to be exploited by the capitalists who run the country where our workers would rather take benefits than allow themselves to have to demean themselves in that way. How about a benefits system that only allows you to take out once you have put in - disabled excepted? Isn't that fair? Me, I'm just a humble worker and tax payer.
09:13 AM on 01/20/2013
Lets hope you keep your job then, or you too will be one of the ungrateful lazy scroungers. You will then, perhaps, begin to understand what it is to be demonised and to try and survive on £71 a week.
"Many in the working classes see people on disability allowance who are capable of work." Disability Living Allowance is paid to people who qualify for it (and it is very hard to get) whether they are in work or not. The out of work benefit for long-term sick and disabled people is ESA, and there are some terrifying statistics on what happens to people who are kicked off that.
"The figures were collected through a survey of 1100 people deemed fit to work. A follow up survey of 590 claimants found 43% were still without any form of income, 28% were on other benefits and 29% had found employment. They were conducted between April and June 2009 and were included in a report for the DWP in 2011." From DWP survey revealed by a FOI. Is that acceptable? 43% of those kicked off the sick have no income at all? None? Maybe they really are ill? Too ill to negotiate the benefits system and survive perhaps?
Indeed many thousands have died, by the DWP's own figures, after being found fit for work by unqualified often foreign national Health Care Professionals at ATOS Work Capability Assessments. I remember seeing a figure of 10,600 such dead from the DWP.
05:55 PM on 01/24/2013
First, I don't believe I called anyone an ungrateful lazy scrounger. Second, the welfare state was intended as a safety net for the needy so if people have had their ESA removed unfairly and they are genuinely sick, then that needs to be addressed. But there are many reasons why they now have no form of income, one being that they may have a partner or family who is supporting them. Third, if 54% of this survey are now either in work or on other benefits that rather justifies the action that is being taken since they obviously shouldn't have been receiving ESA (especially if this survey is a reflection of the situation nationally, as you seem to suggest?) - see my comment about everyone knowing someone who is in receipt of the benefit and who appears to be fit for work. Where did you see the figure of 10,600 who died after having ESA removed?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
britalia56
04:55 PM on 01/19/2013
if only we could get the country to stand together to make things difficult for these nasty b-rstads
04:41 PM on 01/19/2013
I am waiting for an announcement from the government. In order to save the nation from the unnecessary expense of an election. This government has decided to remain power for at least 1000 years. Thus doing away with tiresome elections. Long Live The Leader
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treborc
once Labour now none voter...
10:26 AM on 02/16/2013
Na that was Blair and his group if we vote Miliband back in then your second 1000 year rein begins.

But actually they are all the same having little meetings to discuss how they bother labour and Tory can stuff us
02:36 PM on 01/19/2013
Divide and conquer, oldest strategy in the book. They've done it with everyone. Students, protesters, public sector workers, unemployed. While we squabble with each other politicians can do what their corporate bosses require.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:08 PM on 01/19/2013
we now know the tax system has nothing to do with building schools, hospitals, roads, etc. It is a system of control & a transfer of
wealth from the average person to the elite via interest due on the debt. The fact remains that if government issued debt free money
as they are entitled to do instead of borrowing it at interest from private mega banks, our standard of living would increase ten fold
almost overnight as it would be no longer required to tax the income of the individual.
11:26 PM on 01/18/2013
They have gone too far....it's gonna get ugly!!
This comment has been removed.
03:28 PM on 01/18/2013
anyone taken into account the cost of benefit reforms (sorry if this appears twice- thought id already posted)
03:13 PM on 01/18/2013
anyone actually taken into account the cost of the benefit reforms? which will be massive. any logical person would tax the highest paid earners more instead of making the less well off suffer. benefit fraud is in reality quite low. plus if employers actually paid a decent wage then there would be no need for tax credits etc.
those relying on benefits that pay for food and bills (ie not taking into account housing benefit which never pays the full amount of rent charged by greedy landlords- another thing which needs looking into) they are left with "the law states you need £71 per week to live off" (for a single parent of one child, not sure for others) well lawmakers try feeding yourselves and paying the bills with that! (another issue- the utilities). URGH
03:12 PM on 01/18/2013
Oh also, this is contentious among many of my friends but how about this suggestion:

The hatred of the Conservatives (affectionately named Tories) constitutes a hate crime.

So in that sense, it could be viewed as a war of hate crimes. Like Christians vs Muslims, so the Unemployed vs Conservatives. (As well as the usual Unemployed vs Employed, Labour vs Conservatives). Maybe.

Being a healer/new agey type person, I have that old fashioned belief that love is the best way forward. But we have to make criticisms don't we.
03:25 PM on 01/18/2013
disliking someone or hating someone doesnt constitute a hate crime as it is a feeling. it is actions or words that are hate crimes.
04:09 PM on 01/18/2013
love hahaha...that won't put a roof over your head or feed you or pay the bills or clothe you.....get real!!!!!
02:56 PM on 01/18/2013
be interesting to see if the terrorist living in nice £1400 a mth in suburbian london house has his benefits capped and takes it to court of human rights.teresa may will make another 1 of her bull speeches and he will carry on laughing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lordmak
the pen is mightier than the sword.
02:19 PM on 01/18/2013
what a brilliant read. well done sir.
i have known for a while things are not right with this and previous goverments. i think at the end of the day WE ALL KNOW. they are not on the same page as the rest of us and hence really should not be making decisions which in fact mean nothing to them but hurt thousands of others. the above read has put into words which on my public education could not. a very good and truthfull read sir. very well done to you. lets hope one day someone like yourself will get to run our once great country as i fear we will never again in this country have a real democratic goverment which will in fact make us free instead of enslaving us more.
03:40 PM on 01/19/2013
Mak, as you say the big three parties are the same even UKIP, just out for power and their own narrow stream of idea's.
I have political views that cross from left to right and in the middle depending on the subject, but out parties don't and so the country goes from left to right over the decades and wasting trillions in the meantime.
One step wold be to scrap the party whips and let OUR MP'S vote how they want on any issue.
Even better would be to scrap the party system in the House of Lords where everyone must be an independent and never have been a member of a political party.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lordmak
the pen is mightier than the sword.
01:49 PM on 01/21/2013
you could have something there. i have no idea whats went wrong or how to fix but this goverment and previous have taken the mick out of the people and the country and nothing is getting done about it. it appears the rich are above the law of the land. if labour did what the tories claim. why has there been no court cases etc. its a disgrace what this goverment is doing to the vulnerable and working class.
02:17 PM on 01/18/2013
What precisely did you expect from an Eton/Oxford educated bunch of 'toffs' eh??
If you'd hoped for something better/fairer more 'just', then I sincerely hope you've stopped taking yr daily dose of hallucinogens!!