We now know from this week's Sunday Times Rich List that the billionaires are getting richer by the day whilst the rest of the country faces austerity and lengthening dole queues for the young. Shockingly, the richest 1000 gained an extra £155 billion in the last three years alone.
We also know Boris Johnson's response to the current situation. He is the Tory Mayor of one of the most divided cities in Europe where extravagant wealth cohabits alongside great poverty. Stark figures reveal that the poorest 50% of Londoners have less than 5% of financial or property wealth. The richest 10% now have 65% of financial wealth and over 45% of property wealth.
But Boris sees nothing wrong with this. Not content with Osborne's tax handout which gave an extra £5000 per week to anyone on a salary of £5 million and took money away from pensioners and working families, he now wants to see further tax cuts for the millionaires.
Some people might want to continue to regard 'Boris' as a mere buffoon - harmless, affable and entertaining. He is far more dangerous than that. He emerged out of the very core of the 1%, and is located at the centre of the most dangerous group within an already dangerous Conservative Party.
If the Tories regain the mayoralty on Thursday, they will feel emboldened to continue on their divisive course. In particular, because Mayor Johnson plays a particular role as a cheerleader for the Conservative Right, his wing on the Tories will feel strengthened.
A Boris Johnson victory would embolden Osborne and unleash a further dynamic within the Tory party to tighten the austerity.
These are the stakes which are in play in the mayoral election.
For those who find this argument exaggerated or hard to believe, we should recall that he was amongst the first to advocate a tax payback to the richest in our country.
It was Boris Johnson who took up the cause for a reduction in the 50% tax rate almost as soon as Labour announced the higher rate. Long before Osborne took the decision to cut the top rate of tax and put huge sums of money back into the pockets of the top 1%, Mayor Johnson was calling for double the tax giveaway for the very richest, supporting a cut to just 40%.
Now we see once again Boris acting as a right wing outrider for the 1% with his suggestion of further tax reductions in this week's Sunday Telegraph, aimed not a helping the millions of Londoners bearing the brunt of his Party's austerity drive, but at benefiting the vested interests in the City.
Under the Coalition led by Boris's Tory colleagues, the UK has slipped back into a disastrous and avoidable recession. Millions of Londoners are facing huge pressure on their family budgets thanks to the complete failure of Tory policies - endorsed and promoted by Johnson - to protect the interests of the public and deliver jobs and growth.
Boris's now infamous "chicken feed" comments - referring to the £250,000 per year income he receives for a second job writing for the Telegraph on top of his Mayoral responsibilities - confirm just how obscenely out of touch he really is.
While he rakes in this "chicken feed", more than 400,000 London pensioners have lost money through the Tory 'granny tax' to pay for a tax cut for the super rich. And almost 120,000 London families face losing all of their tax credits because of the Tory tax credit cuts.
It is irresponsible of many in the commentariat to ignore these issues and to pretend that the mayoral election is only a battle between two personalities with no real national consequence for the wider society. Do not believe this even for a second.
We can't let the Tories get away with it. A second term for a Tory Mayor will have consequences for us all. On Friday Mr Clegg encountered mothers who are going without meals in order to feed their children. He said you would have to have a cold heart not to be affected as if their plight had nothing to do with the government of which he is the deputy prime minister.
But the voters must not think, like Clegg, that they can wash their hands of responsibility for their actions on Thursday if they fail to vote against the Tories. Let every elector in London understand that their actions on Thursday can either accelerate the austerity or contribute to the resistance.
It is time to resist.
Follow Jon Trickett MP on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jon_trickett
Kanja Ibrahim Sesay: The Next Mayor of London Must Not Fail the Black Communities
Joe Cottrell-Boyce: Mayor's Mentoring Scheme is a Failure
Chris Berkin: Izzard and Livingstone
Tiernan Douieb: Why Boris Mustn't Be the Clown Mayor of London
Mayor Boris Johnson | Provides news, articles and photos by and ...
Boris Johnson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Boris Johnson (@MayorofLondon) on Twitter
Boris Johnson's columns - Telegraph
Borisopolis: London under Boris Johnson | Art and design | The ...
Sensible answers only please, posted on a £10 note to my account in the Seychelles.
http://thewhiteticket.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/insight-party-politics-and-dangers-of.html
So the democracy politicians have been telling us we were living in, from time immemorial, is a fallacy? We should be mandating actual polices at polls, not self-serving personalities.
"Boris sees nothing wrong with this."
Its not beyond our Ken either.
"He emerged out of the very core of the 1%"
While his opponent is merely a mild mannered Mister 10%?
"emboldened to continue on their divisive course."
Them (fighting) for their small corner, and the other lot for theirs.
"unleash a further dynamic within the Tory party to tighten the austerity."
As Shakespeare once observed. That might not be all that gets unleashed.
"the stakes which are in play"
are democracy vs scatocracy? Which’ll it be?
"a disastrous and avoidable recession."
So MPs will be releasing their warning e-mails to Gordon (against unleashing the banks of gore), any day now.
"We can't let the Tories get away with it."
When by right (of revolving door), it’s the other party’s turn to.
Wot EU referendum vote?
"On Friday Mr Clegg encountered mothers who are going without meals in order to feed their children."
Did he promise to cut tuition fees, if he got elected again?
"the voters must not think, like Clegg"
Surely the voters must think, unlike Clegg?
"It is time to resist"
jumping onto the same old political merry-go-round. For yet another going-nowhere ride.
Britain’s inward investment standing drops from 2nd place to 27 place.
Britain drops behind Brazil in the economic league. ( an agrarian economy)
Manufacturing collapse from 1997 20% of GDP to 2010 only 9% of GDP
Under Thatcher, manufacturing’s share of the economy fell from 25.8 per cent to 22.5 per cent.
Now lets look at Labours record:
Manufacturing accounted for more than 20 per cent of the economy in 1997, the year Labour came to power. In 2007, that share had declined to 12.4 per cent
25% of people in work only work part time.
From 1997 to 2010 public expenditure increases by 68%
Britians unity and the union of the UK put at risk by Blair( Scotland now wants to break away)
OECD stated that the NHS was the 3rd most inefficient health service out of a peer group of 29 countries.
Machine tool investment barometer showsWe are 18th in the league and invest one 10th what the Germans invest.
Germany spends 47pc more on research and development than the UK.
The history of Labour 1997 to 2010 was that apart from borrowing hundreds of billions, throwing obscene amounts of money at the public sector , creating huge unfunded liabilities on pfi and public sector pensions , putting us in a crippling economic and financial position,
Pretty weak argument. Last Labour Cabinet was millionaire central.
I'd like to see Boris' vote plummet but unfortunately there are still lots of people out there who fall for his bluff, 'I'm a bit of a buffoon' act. And lots of people who fall for Ken's 'friend of the workers' act.
Best outcome? A Green or UKIP mayor (I hate UKIP, but it's more likely as it panders to people's prejudices more than the Greens). The main parties need a bloody nose, big time.
Their tactic is to pretend they care for the poor they created and betrayed.
Oh boy, man is without hope.
Yep, Oh' Man & Women, are ALL without hope.
Time NOW for a General Election.
Millionaires should do what they "Only" can afford to do best, which is go to each others Jet - Set Parties and mix with their like minded elites, like Murdoch where they can talk their silly heads off about Tax - Haven's, for themselves.
3500 millionaires at the BBC Labour media outlet, prosecuting single mums for salaries they could not earn anywhere else.
Millionaire Union bosses, after creating the BNP trade unions became cheif funders of the Labour party and thus making £500,000 a year, Prentis, Crow and co.
Murdoch, billionaire who Labour and the Tories have tap danced for for at least 20 years. Labour even started wars for this guys support.
Fred Goodwin, Gordon Browns close personal friend who caused RBS problems and was allowed to run treasury comittees by brown. Brown also knighted him, Ed Balls and Miliband agreed with him on I heard.
The millionaires at Brussels in the European Commisions, the highest paid politicans in the developed world. Private planes all round at the EU, while Romanian kids have no schools and young people have no future.
Labour are as bad or worse than the Tories, they are better atcors and have a strong media outlet, BBC, to back up their rants.
Therefore, whether or not they may play at supporting any Political - Parties is merely a Side - Show on their Roads to amass their further enrichment's of Cash, wherever they can find it.
No man can serve two masters, simply because one will always demand more loyalty than the other. I suggest that the paymaster Mammon secures far more loyalty than those that constitute the 'public'.
And when it comes to investigation, few in public office can truly be shown to have totally clean hands in dealing with public matters whilst their mitts are soiled with private money.
I have no objection to anyone getting a nice sinecure, be it in the media or in general business, but NOT whilst they are also supposed to be serving the public,.
That is a recipe for graft and corruption, which, when looking at the present incumbents in Westminster, would appear to be the case.
Murdoch et al, not withstanding.