When I said, with a glowing "Oh ho!", that the Huffington Post had asked me to blog for them, I received minimal "Oh ho" back. "Write about unpaid journalism," snarked my Twitterfeed, apparently confusing writing the odd piece with being put in a sweatshop and lashed until a Pulitzer came out.
Writing for free is a grey area. Despite the ubiquity (and importance) of blogs and that many high profile sites trade content for prestige only, it's often looked down upon if it makes up part of your career. When, as a newly-hatched post-grad, I joined one journalism forum, the stance was: "Don't write unless you're paid. It undermines you and it undermines journalism."
The view tends to be that writing unpaid is something to do only on work experience, when every nib is a valuable cutting. I was certainly less keen on writing for free when I was unemployed for two months, but I wasn't any less keen on writing.
So why write for free?
Free is why people write fanzines, update blogs and tweet. It's pressure off, it's the opportunity to practise something you enjoy and share it with people immediately. And particularly online, there's a limited supply of people who will pay. My pitching skills are sufficiently atrocious that, if I were only to write for money outside my main job, I would probably forget how to hold a pencil within a year. I don't want that, because I love writing and I need to do it.
As the internet is absolutely massive, there's plenty of room for you to write about, or find, exactly what interests you. Six years into my career and I have yet to be hired as anyone's all-in-one The Archers, Pokémon, sharks, X-Men and cocktails expert, but that's ok because we have the internet!
The very reason I wanted to write in the first place was because writers made my life brighter. Instead of sitting in my rainy corner of England, I was reading about the Countess of Chichester and her show jumping llamas in Style. I was wandering around with Jilly Cooper, Dylan Thomas, John Donne and Gabriel Garcia Marquez. I was following rock stars on tour and falling so in love with Laura Barton's barbed wit that I wrote her a fan letter when she left The Guardian.
Reading a piece that someone has written with care, reason and wit makes my day. It's what I want to do, to get better at, and you don't get better at something by sitting on your hands like a human vending machine, waiting for someone to put a coin in.
In the event that my online habits die and I become able to string more than 800 words together at a time, then fine: writing for free will be acceptable because I will be "working on my novel". Until then, I will be working on my navel. And why not?
Follow Kat Brown on Twitter: www.twitter.com/katbrown82
ha. good try.
your last line concedes that you may be navel-gazing, but hon, what you are doing with your writing is a long way from the solipsistic.
and of course, you know that.
as for writing for free, we might as well.
most do anyway.
i'm the exception to the rule.
i'm american exceptionalism, i guess you could say.
i've made 500 dollars after studying and working for 20 yrs, even sitting through workshops/seminars with a gaggle of like-minded geese,all of us writers of verse.
More verse is being published than at almost any time else in history, thanks to academics who publish one another and who keep each other afloat largely by teaching. It's often grim.
But then, you know poets...(and of course, that romantic conception of the excessive poet, exceeding all expectations in the fields of alcohol and or drugs, in romance, and in odd behavior in general, just really doesn't help the situation a bit).
Here comes my ironically detached emoticon: ;
The internet is awash in personal voices craving being heard and valued because they were not, creating a narcissistic echo chamber of deeply damaged, wounded selves.
If money is speech, as the plutocratic US Supreme Court has ruled, then what are those who write for no money? Powerless and full of sound and fury, making a lot of noise that signifies nothing to the powers that be.
Solution: Pay bloggers out of a global blogger fund for which one must QUALIFY, just as one has to qualify to belong to the Writer's Guild. A guild structure, with the public funding -- through such public sourcing entities as Crewfund, for example. That way the people are supporting those who speak for them, rather than writers' content being ruled by the corporations who advertise on these pages. Creating 'people's corporations' -- i.e., guilds, co-ops.
Ultimately, if the writer is good he or she WILL get paid—just not necessarily for the original piece itself.
Anyone who wants to write off the top of their head to create a piece without a central argument, facts or research should feel free.
b) I totally understand your reasoning, things 'shouldn't be free' but they very much are on the internet and complaining about it is like shouting into a bottomless well.
c) Exploitation tends to imply a certain level of ignorance but it seems quite clear from the subject matter that Kat knows what she is up to.
d) In my opinion paywalls and other editorial rings of protection are not sustainable when so many sites offer equally quality content for free. As such, perhaps the best way to approach monetising your writing online is the sort of compromise that the author proposes.....
No matter what the revenue-generating model may be, content creators should be getting a slice ... and not just the 1% typical of newspapers' budgets, either!
Brown admits her pitching skills are "atrocious". Unfortunately, they're part of the game. I don't know a single self-supporting author who doesn't bemoan that process. But we all pull up our socks and find work to pay the bills, while still fulfilling our passion for the craft.
I teach for Writers.com and have students landing good-paying work off the strength of their personal blogs or rudimentary portfolios. With enough hustle, it *can* happen … and it’s more likely for those who keep battling, rather than settling for exposure.