Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Katherine Baldwin

GET UPDATES FROM Katherine Baldwin
 

India is Worst G20 Country to Be a Woman, Canada Is Best - Poll Shows There Is So Much More to Do

Posted: 13/06/2012 12:46

When heads of state from the Group of 20 most industrialised nations gather for their annual summit in Mexico next week, there'll be four women in the family photograph. Take a look at national parliaments and corporate boardrooms across much of the G20 and the male-to-female ratio doesn't get much better - and in some cases it's a lot worse.

Yes, women's rights have come far in past decades but the statistics show we still live in a man's world.

Nowhere is that more apparent than in countries like India, where females are killed at birth and burned alive in dowry-related disputes, or in Saudi Arabia, where women are banned from driving and virtually every aspect of their lives is controlled by men.

The widespread practices of infanticide, child marriage and gender-based violence were the main reasons why experts ranked India the worst place in the G20 for women in a perceptions poll published today by TrustLaw, a legal news service run by Thomson Reuters Foundation.

In Saudi Arabia, which ranked second-worst, women only earned the right to vote in 2011, while Indonesia, which followed Saudi Arabia in the ranking, faces similar challenges to India in terms of child marriage, sexual trafficking, violence and exploitation.

At the other end of the scale, Canada ranked the best place to be a woman thanks to policies that promote women's freedoms and good access to education and healthcare, but experts noted that Canada still has a long way to go, particularly in terms of narrowing the gender pay gap that stands around 30 percent.

The lack of free healthcare in the United States kept it out of the top five best countries. It was also penalised by a number of experts for the mounting restrictions on abortion and other reproductive services being adopted at state level. The U.S. was ranked sixth by the 370 gender experts polled.

The survey paints a sobering picture but, unfortunately, not one that will get much attention at the G20 summit in Los Cabos, Baja California, on June 18-19, where the eurozone crisis is set to take centre stage.

Granted, there are other forums to discuss women's rights. But as someone who's reported on a few G20 meetings in the past, the stark contrast between the sumptuous resort hotel hosting the gathering and the dire conditions endured by women in some of these countries feels a little uncomfortable.

It feels more uncomfortable because I've spent the past few months helping to compile the G20 women's poll. As a journalist who's lived in, reported on or travelled to most of these countries, I already knew a lot of the facts. But speaking to gender experts about wife-burning or child marriage in India, trafficking in Russia or rape and HIV/Aids in South Africa has brought the grim reality home.

In G20 host Mexico, which polled 15th out of 19 countries of the G20 (excluding the European Union grouping), a culture of male chauvinism pervades and high levels of violence against women have been exacerbated by the drugs war. And, as I recall from living there between 1995 and 2000, there are pockets of extreme poverty that are a world apart from the capital's skyscrapers and aren't reflected in national indicators on health and education.

The murders of hundreds of women in the border town of Ciudad Juarez and stories - related by activists - of women taking contraception before passing immigration to guard against expected rape are particularly disturbing. Mexico, like a number of G20 countries, has a stark divide between the rich and poor and women are often on the losing end of that wealth gap.

Mexican President Felipe Calderon, who'll host the G20 summit, had said he wanted development to feature highly on the G20 summit agenda and sustainable growth is up for discussion.

This is a start, as it's clear there can be no effective development without women's rights and freedoms - a point made by journalist and author Nicholas Kristof who commented on the poll. India and Saudi Arabia, he said, "are trying to develop with one hand tied behind their backs".

What's also clear from the survey results is that neither wealth nor democracy guarantee women's rights and that what's written on paper - in the form of laws and international conventions - rarely reflects the reality on the ground. Laws are worth little without effective enforcement - the violence against women plaguing Mexico is a case in point - and without education and national buy-in.

The poll also shows the impact a female head of state can have on a country's global image. Germany was rated the second-best place to be a woman although its gender pay gap is higher than the United Kingdom and France, while it came last out of 11 developed and developing countries in terms of female corporate executives in a 2010 McKinsey study.

Similarly, Brazil has a female president but women occupy only 9 percent of seats in its parliament's lower house.

I spent nearly three years living in Brazil and five in Mexico but I've now been back in the UK for nearly a decade. Living here, it's become easy to take for granted my rights as a woman, even if Britain has its own challenges - the UK came third in the poll. But the research I've done on this survey in past months reminds me why it's important we all fight for those women who don't have it so good.


Katherine Baldwin freelances for Thomson Reuters Foundation and helped compile the women's poll.

 

Follow Katherine Baldwin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/From40WithLove

FOLLOW UK
When heads of state from the Group of 20 most industrialised nations gather for their annual summit in Mexico next week, there'll be four women in the family photograph. Take a look at national parlia...
When heads of state from the Group of 20 most industrialised nations gather for their annual summit in Mexico next week, there'll be four women in the family photograph. Take a look at national parlia...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This comment has been removed.
12:01 AM on 06/14/2012
" It was also penaIised by a number of experts for the mounting restrictions on ab0rtion and other reproductive services being adopted at state level."?

LOL... so these feminists think ab0tion is ok...but selective ab0rtion is immoral?

Ha Ha!

If ab0tion is not m_urder, then selective ab0tion is not m_urder!

Get a CIue you mang!e fem!na_zies!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:23 AM on 06/14/2012
Selective abortion is often coerced and/or a result of the devaluation of women. It has major long-term effects on the society concerned and reinforces the lower status of women within it.

Most women in first world countries who wish it are neither coerced nor is the sex of the fetus an issue. They are free to make an informed choice.
02:58 PM on 06/14/2012
Ah..so western women's choice of selective abortion is ok... but those other thrird world women should not have the choice!
 
I thought you guys were "pro choice".
 
Ha Ha
11:35 PM on 06/13/2012
How ironic to have Canada at the top of the list. Canada's prime minister is an evangelical Christian and his government is floating the idea of outlawing abortion.
12:11 AM on 06/14/2012
IF you don't want selective abortion then outlawing abortion is the right thing to do.

Female Fetus = Male Fetus!

:P
02:19 AM on 06/14/2012
solda where women have equal rights they aren't too concerned about whether they have a boy or a girl. The custom of giving males power and making them desirable versus females relates to their ability to make money and suport their parents when they are old. If girls have to marry at twelve or thirteen and have an endless stream of babies then they can't do that. n fact they have a good chance of dieing in childbirth. Prior to technology making it possible to determine the sex of a baby very early in the pregnancy, girls were simply killed after birth. If you want to stop selective abortions re sex, then start putting your time and money into educating girls and making women independently wealthy. When women are worth what men are then the desire to have a son will not be greater than the desire to have a healthy baby.
11:14 PM on 06/13/2012
I don't get who these so-called experts are who ranked the countries? It didn't say anything other than that the women in Saudi are not allowed to drive and could vote only in 2011. But Canada was ranked highly because of access to healthcare and education? duh! Even Saudi female have world class healthcare facilities and good education access (as good as the men can get), the pay scale and number of females in boardroom might be lesser to men, but so is the case in almost every western country.
Surely other ills of society such as in Mexico (high levels of violence against women) are not even heard of in Saudi Arabia. How come a factor of not getting to drive is worse than getting raped??? This survey doesn't look like the perceptions of experts but some tom dick and harry who is glued to foxnews!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Fowler
I try....I really do!
01:04 PM on 06/13/2012
There are tiny percentage of Rich in India (compared to he total population) whilst billions live in a semi medieval fuedalistic agricultural society where the 20th, let alone, 21st century has to make an impact upon "ancient" customs, traditions and ways of thinking and acting. So it should be no shock that women are treated badly.

And with the male dominated Saudi society, supported by fascist religious zealots who force the "Laws" and a "God" figure upon them that sees women as nothing less than creatures created to serve and be subserviant to men, we should once again see that having money beyond understanding does not, sadly, create understanding.

But with both countries, we happily trade, work with them in Financial and military matters and highlight how "better" their societies are getting........but not if you are a woman it seems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grittyreboot
LOLitical activist
07:06 PM on 06/13/2012
You really hit the proverbial nail on the head with your comments on India. We often forget that we're dealing with 2 very distinct Indias: The India of the cities- urban, with access to modernity, their primary wants are better education, more liberal social policies, better physical and information infrastructure; and then you have the rest of India- rural, poor, agrarian, their primary wants are better water infrastructure, more access to markets and credit, and they couldn't care less about social justice.

In the west the rural/urban split is roughly 30/70 in terms of numbers, in India that's reversed. However, its still the urban minority that the world interacts with, buys from, and its the urban minority that calls a lot of the shots.
04:26 PM on 06/14/2012
Female infanticide, deaths relating to dowry demands, wife burning don't just happen in rural areas of India, but also in the modern, educated, urban parts of India, including in the wealthier of families. You will find the value of daughters in rural India as well as modern India. Likewise you will also find disdain for daughters in rural India and urban India.Basically, in India, violence against women has little to do with class/education, but with the cultural attitude of women belonging to the men and the in-laws and of course being burdens. The latter "problem" is can be solved by education however, but the former two attitudes will take time to change.
12:03 AM on 06/14/2012
In India, the far Ieft congress party has ruled Inida 90% of the time since India came to be... and thats why India has not progressed!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:58 PM on 06/14/2012
Really now? You don't understand India, eh? I mean, look at China's progress under its Communist Party. Its not a left or right thing, its that the situation was so bad in both countries that democracy is the slow but moral way to develop while totalitarianism is the fast but immoral way to develop. I mean, consider Russia under Putin, we see high levels of development just like China but a low level of morality in its institutions.